Examining the relationship between principal mindful leadership,work-life balance,and teacher effectiveness in Malaysian secondary schools: The mediating role of job satisfaction
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Examining the relationship between principal mindful leadership,work-life balance,and teacher effectiveness in Malaysian secondary schools: The mediating role of job satisfaction
Teacher effectiveness is the indispensable catalyst in transforming educational curricula into tangible, high-quality learning outcomes. Nevertheless, the concurrent struggle with school leadership and work-life balance issues presents substantial barriers that diminish teachers’ operational capability. Grounded by the stimulus-organism-response (SOR), high-reliability organisation (HRO), and job demand-resources (JD-R) theories, this study examined how teacher job satisfaction mediates the influence of principal mindful leadership and teachers’ work-life balance and effectiveness. Employing a quantitative cross-sectional design, data were collected from 384 teachers across 153 sary schools in the Malaysian state of Terengganu. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling analysis for model evaluation and hypothesis testing demonstrated that mindful leadership and work-life balance significantly enhance teacher effectiveness, with job satisfaction partially mediating these relationships. The findings offer distinct contributions to the literature on mindful leadership in Eastern, collectivist settings and provide an empirical basis for school leadership training and policy intervention to optimise teacher performance.
Abdul HalimNHassanABasriR, et al. (2021) Job satisfaction as a mediator between leadership styles and organisational commitment of teachers in Malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE)7(2): 61–71.
2.
AdamsDCheahKSLThienL, et al. (2021) Leading schools through the COVID-19 crisis in a south-east Asian country. Management in Education38(2): 72–78. Original work published 2024.
AgastyaKDMeylianaHMudjiartoH, et al. (2023) How does performance employee enhanced mindful leadership of school employees?Journal of Economic, Religious, and Entrepreneurship (JoERE)1(1): 1–11.
5.
AzaharSChengC (2024) Understanding Malaysia’s decline in PISA scores: causes and consequences Policy brief. (June).
6.
BakkerABDemeroutiESanz-VergelAI (2014) Burnout and work engagement: The JDR approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior1: 389–411.
7.
BloomNVan ReenenJ (2006) Management practices, work-life balance, and productivity: A review of some recent evidence. Oxford Review of Economic Policy22(4): 457–482.
8.
BorrebaLPotaneJ (2024) The mediating effects of work-life balance on the relationship of school heads’ leadership practices and teachers’ work satisfaction. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives2(4). 10.69569/jip.2024.0048.
9.
BrewerPVenaikS (2011) Individualism-collectivism in hofstede and GLOBE. Journal of International Business Studies42(3): 436–445.
10.
BushT (2013) Distributed leadership: The model of choice in the 21st century. Educational Management Administration and Leadership41: 543–544.
11.
BushT (2021) Leading through COVID-19: Managing a crisis. Educational Management Administration and Leadership49: 373–374.
12.
ButarbutarMKurnia LubisATua SiregarR, et al. (2022) Implementation of work stress in moderating work-life balance and flexible work arrangements for job satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management3(5): 1357–1364.
13.
ChongMYMansurKHoYJ (2015) The influence of perception of school principal’s leadership on teachers’ job satisfaction in the interior of Sabah, Malaysia: A case study in Beaufort. Korean Social Science Journal42(1): 1–12.
14.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillside. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. [Preprint].
15.
CredeMChernyshenkoOSStarkS, et al. (2007) Job satisfaction as mediator: An assessment of job satisfaction's position within the nomological network. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology80(3): 515–538.
16.
Darling-HammondLRothmanR (2011) Teacher and leader effectiveness in high-performing education systems. Alliance for Excellent Education.
17.
ErtürkR (2022) Conflict in schools: A qualitative study. Participatory Educational Research9(1): 251–270.
18.
HahnEDAngSH (2017) From the editors: New directions in the reporting of statistical results in the Journal of World Business. Journal of World Business52(2): 125–126.
19.
HaiderSJabeenSAhmadJ (2018) Moderated mediation between work life balance and employee job performance: The role of psychological wellbeing and satisfaction with coworkers. Revista de Psicologia del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones34(1): 29–37.
20.
HairJFHultGTMRingleCM, et al. (2017) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd EditionThousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
21.
HairJFHultGTMRingleCM, et al (2021) Sage Publication.
22.
HalimNAHassanABasriR (2021) Job satisfaction as a mediator between leadership styles and organisational commitment of teachers in Malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education17(2): 61.
23.
HallingerP (2011) Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration49: 125–142.
24.
HarrisAJonesM (2019) Teacher leadership and educational change. School Leadership and Management39(2): 123–126.
25.
HassanZDollardMFWinefieldAH (2010) Work-family conflict in east vs western countries. Cross Cultural Management17(1): 30–49.
26.
HattieJ (2013) Visible learning for teachers maximising impact on learning by John Hattie. The Main Idea [Preprint].
27.
HaymanJ (2005) Psychometric assessment of an instrument designed to measure work life balance. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management13(1): 85–91.
28.
HendrawijayaATHilmiMIHasanF, et al. (2020) Determinants of teacher performance with job satisfactions mediation. International Journal of Instruction13(3): 845–860.
29.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43(1): 115–135.
30.
HiggsMRowlandD (2024) Is change all in the mind? A study of leader mindfulness, leader behaviors in implementing change. Journal of General Management49(2): 146–162.
31.
HlaďoPDosedlováJHarvánkováK, et al. (2020) Work ability among upper-secondary school teachers: Examining the role of burnout, sense of coherence, and work-related and lifestyle factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(24): 9185.
32.
HofstedeG (1980) Culture and organisations. International Studies of Management & Organization10(4): 15–41.
33.
HoyW (2003) An analysis of enabling and mindful school structures: Some theoretical, research and practical considerations. Journal of Educational Administration41(1): 87–108.
34.
HoyWGageCTarterC (2006) School mindfulness and faculty trust: Necessary conditions for each other?Educational Administration Quarterly - EDUC ADMIN QUART42: 236–255.
35.
HülshegerURAlbertsHJFeinholdtA, et al. (2013) Benefits of mindfulness at work: The role of mindfulness in emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology98(2): 310–325.
36.
IdrisMADollardMFWinefieldAH (2011) The effect of globalisation on employee psychological health and job satisfaction in Malaysian workplaces. Journal of Occupational Health53(6): 447–454.
37.
JohariFSRuslaniMRSamudinNMR, et al. (2018) Understanding teachers’ job satisfaction through work-life balance policies. Journal of Academia6(1): 112–119.
38.
KaratepeOMTekinkusM (2006) The effects of work-family conflict, emotional exhaustion, and intrinsic motivation on job outcomes of front-line employees. International Journal of Bank Marketing24(3): 173–193.
39.
KearneyWSKelseyCHerringtonD (2013) Mindful leaders in highly effective schools: A mixed-method application of hoy’s M-scale. Educational Management Administration and Leadership41(3): 316–335.
40.
KlineRB (2011) Univariate Normality. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling [Preprint].
41.
KockN (2015) Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration11(4): 1–10.
42.
KrejcieRVMorganDW (1970) Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement30: 607–610.
43.
LachowiczMJPreacherKJKelleyK (2018) A novel measure of effect size for mediation analysis. Psychological Methods23(2): 244–261.
LangeSRowoldJ (2019) Mindful leadership: Evaluation of a mindfulness-based leader intervention. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Organisationspsychologie50(3): 319–335.
46.
LarsonRB (2019) Controlling social desirability bias. International Journal of Market Research61(5): 534–547.
47.
LavrakasP (2013) Acquiescence response bias. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. 10.4135/9781412963947.n3.
48.
LindellMKWhitneyDJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology86(1): 114–121.
49.
LiuBZhangZLuQ (2021) Influence of leader mindfulness on the emotional exhaustion of university teachers: Resources crossover effect Frontiers in. Psychology (Savannah, Ga )12(2): 1–16.
50.
LiuYBellibaşMŞGümüşS (2021) The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration and Leadership49(3): 430–453.
51.
MahfouzJ (2018) Mindfulness training for school administrators: Effects on well-being and leadership. Journal of Educational Administration56(6): 602–619.
52.
McEwanB (2020) Sampling and validity. Annals of the International Communication Association44: 235–247.
53.
MemonMATingHCheahJH, et al. (2020) Sample size for survey research. Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling4(2): 1–20.
54.
MokhtarAMaouloudVMOmowunmiAK, et al. (2023) Teachers’ commitment, self-efficacy and job satisfaction as communicated by trained teachers. Management in Education37(3): 127–139.
55.
MuijsDReynoldsD (2011) Effective teaching: Evidence and practice.
56.
NüboldAVan QuaquebekeNHülshegerUR (2020) Be(com)ing real: A multi-source and an intervention study on mindfulness and authentic leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology35(4): 469–488.
57.
OECDP (2023) PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
58.
OrduA (2021) Mediating role of work-life balance and job satisfaction in the relationship between person-job fit and life satisfaction among teachers. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews10(2). 10.52963/perr_biruni_v10.n2.02.
59.
PavaniKDPrasadJD (2023) Work-life balance and it’s impact on job satisfaction with special reference to school teachers of Vijayawada. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research5(5): 1–14.
60.
PodsakoffPMPodsakoffNPWilliamsLJ, et al. (2024) Common method bias: It's bad, it's complex, it's widespread, and it's not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior11(1): 17–61.
61.
PrakashCChandraS (2020) Measuring teacher effectiveness development of a shorter version of Teacher Effectiveness Scale (TES). International Journal of Education, Modern Management, Applied Science & Social Science (IJEMMASSS)12(03): 58–63.
62.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
63.
PuniaVKambojM (2013) Quality of work-life balance among teachers in higher education institutions. Learning Community-An International Journal of Educational and Social Development4(3): 97.
64.
RebJNarayananJChaturvediS (2014) Leading mindfully: Two studies on the influence of supervisor trait mindfulness on employee well-being and performance. Mindfulness5(1): 36–45.
65.
RobbinsSPJudgeTA (2018) Essential of Organisational Behaviour. London: Pearson Education.
RungtusanathamMMillerJWBoyerKK (2014) Theorising, testing, and concluding for mediation in SCM research: Tutorial and procedural recommendations. Journal of Operations Management32(3): 99–113.
68.
SalkindN (2013) Attrition bias. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. 10.4135/9781412952644.n34.
69.
SarstedtMRadomirLMoisescuOI, et al. (2022) Latent class analysis in PLS-SEM: A review and recommendations for future applications. Journal of Business Research138: 398–407.
70.
SayadiY (2016) The effect of dimensions of transformational, transactional, and non-leadership on the job satisfaction and organisational commitment of teachers in Iran. Management in Education30(2): 57–65.
71.
SechrestLFayTLZaidiSMH (1972) Problems of translation in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology3(1): 41–56.
72.
ShafieeNSAbdul GhaniMMahamoodY (2019) School mindfulness: Conceptual review of 21st century teaching and learning practice. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling4(32): 315–327.
73.
SpectorPE (2020) Job satisfaction survey 2 test manual.
74.
StedhamYSkaarTB (2019) Mindfulness, trust, and leader effectiveness: A conceptual framework. Frontiers in Psychology10(7): 1–11.
75.
StrongeJH (2018) Qualities of Effective Teachers, ASCD.
SubrahmanyamS (2025) Strategic Approaches to Mindful Leadership and Change Management. Lebanon: IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
78.
TekelEKaradagE (2020) School bullying, school mindfulness and school academic performance: A structural equation modelling study. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools30(2): 129–145.
79.
ThienLMAdamsD (2021) Distributed leadership and teachers’ affective commitment to change in Malaysian primary schools: The contextual influence of gender and teaching experience. Educational Studies47(2): 179–199.
80.
TohalSAMaliI (2023) The effectiveness of a group guidance program based on mindfulness in improving job satisfaction among male and female teachers. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies5(11): 54–62.
81.
UdinU (2023) The impact of work-life balance on employee performance: Mediating role of affective commitment and job satisfaction. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning18(11): 3649–3655.
82.
UmaSekaranRogerBougie (2016) Research method for business textbook (A skill building approach). United States: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
83.
WanWYSalahudinSN (2023) The relationship between work-life balance and performance of teachers in malacca. Research in Management of Technology and Business4(1): 149–162.
84.
WeickKSutcliffeK (2001) Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. San Francisco: Wiley, Vol. 1(3).
YangNChenCCChoiJ, et al. (2000) Sources of work-family conflict: A sino-US comparison of the effects of work and family demands. Academy of Management Journal43(1): 113–123.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
