This study captures the impact of school choice decisions by comparing the racial composition of the district schools students exited to the charter schools they entered. Charter school catchment areas are operationalized using a statewide student-level database to track school attendance patterns of individual students over 4 years. Charter elementary school choosers enter charter schools that are more racially segregated than the district schools they exited, although on entrance into high school, choosers enter charter schools that are as racially segregated or more integrated than the district schools they exited. In addition, racial segregation patterns are the result of White flight and Black and Native American students self-segregating into charter schools that are more racially isolated than the district schools they exit.
Archbald, D.A. (2000). School choice and school stratification: Shortcomings of the stratification critique and recommendations for theory and research . Educational Policy, 14(2), 214-240.
2.
Arizona Department of Education. (2000). Annual report of the superintendent of public instruction. Phoenix: Author.
3.
Arizona Department of Education. (2001). Annual report of the superintendent of public instruction: 1999-2000. Phoenix: Author.
4.
Arizona Department of Education. (2004). Superintendent's annual report for fiscal year 2003-2004. Phoenix: Author.
5.
Arizona Revised Statutes. Charter schools; purpose; scope (Vol. §15-181).
6.
Arizona Revised Statutes. Charter schools; requirements (Vol. §15-183).
7.
Bernstein, M.F. (1999). Why I'm wary of charter schools. School Administrator, 56(7), 24-28.
8.
Bracey, G. (2004). Setting the record straight (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann .
9.
Carnoy, M., Jacobsen, R., Mishel, L., & Rothstein, R. (2005). The charter school dust-up: Examining the evidence on enrollment and achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
Cobb, C.D., & Glass, G.V. (1999). Ethnic segregation in Arizona charter schools . Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(1), 39.
11.
Cobb, C.D., & Glass, G.V. (2000, April). The U.S. charter school movement and ethnic segregation. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
12.
Frankenberg, E., & Lee, C. (2003). Charter schools and race: A lost opportunity for integrated education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(32).
13.
Garcia, D.R. (2006). Academic and racial segregation in charter schools . Unpublished manuscript.
14.
Garcia, G.F., & Garcia, M. (1996). Charter schools: Another top-down innovation. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 34-36.
15.
Garn, G. (1999). Solving the implementation problem: The case of Arizona charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives , 7(26).
16.
Gifford, M., Ogle, M., & Solomon, L. (1998). Who is choosing charter schools? A snapshot of geography and ethnicity of charter schools students (No. 2). Phoenix, AZ: Center for Market-Based Education.
17.
Gill, B.P., Timpane, M.P., Ross, K.E., & Brewer, D.J. (2001). Rhetoric versus reality: What we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
18.
Glazerman, S.M. (1997). School quality and social stratification: The determinants and consequences of school choice. San Diego , CA: American Education Research Association.
19.
Gresham, A., Hess, F., Maranto, R., & Milliman, R. (2000). Desert bloom: Arizona's free market in education . Phi Delta Kappan, 18(10), 751-757.
20.
Halchin, E.L. (1999). And this parent went to marked: Education as public versus private good. In R. Maranto, S. Milliman, F. Hess , & A. Gresham (Ed.), School choice in the real world: Lessons from Arizona charter schools (pp. 19-38). Boulder, CO: Westview.
21.
Hassel, B.C. (1999). The charter school challenge. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
22.
Henig, J.R., & Sugarman, S.D. (1999). The nature and extent of school choice. In S. D. Sugarman & F. R. Kemerer (Eds.), School choice and social controversy: Politics, policy and law (pp. 13-35). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
23.
Hill, P.T., & Guin, K. (2002). Baselines for assessment of choice programs. In P. T. Hill (Ed.), Choice with equity (pp. 15-50). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
24.
Horn, J., & Miron, G. (1999). Evaluation of the Michigan public school academy initiative. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.
25.
Lacireno-Paquet, N., Holyoke, T.T., Moser, M., & Henig, J.R. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 145-158.
26.
Legislative Office of Education Oversight. ( 2001). Community schools in Ohio: Second-year implementation report (Vol. 1). Columbus, OH: Author.
27.
Manno, B.V. (1999). Accountability: The key to charter school reform . Washington, DC: Center for Education Reform.
28.
McEwan, P.J. (2000). The potential impact of large-scale voucher programs . Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 103-149.
29.
Medler, A. (2004). Charter schools: Complementing or competing with public education? In E. Rofes & L. M. Stulberg (Eds.), The emancipatory promise of charter schools (pp. 189-218). Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
Miron, G., & Horn, J. (2002). Evaluation of Connecticut charter schools and the charter school initiative. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.
31.
Miron, G., & Nelson, C. (2004). Student achievement in charter schools: What we know and why we know so little. In K. E. Bulkley & P. Wohlstetter (Eds.), Taking account of charter schools: What's happened and what's next? (pp. 161-175). New York: Teachers College Press.
32.
Miron, G., Nelson, C., & Risley, J. (2002). Strengthening Pennsylvania's charter school reform: Findings from the statewide evaluation and discussion of relevant policy issues, year 5 report. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center.
33.
Molnar, A., Morales, J., & Vander Wyst, A. (2000). Profiles of for-profit education management companies. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
34.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. ( 2003). The nation's report card. America's charter schools: Results from the NAEP 2003 pilot study (NCES 2005-45). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics .
35.
National Charter School Research Project. ( 2005). Hopes, fears, & reality: A balanced look at American charter schools in 2005. Seattle: University of Washington.
36.
Orfield, G. (2001). Schools more separate: Consequences of a decade of resegregation. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project.
37.
Parker, W. (2001). The color of choice: Race and charter schools . Tulane Law Review, 75(3), 563-630.
38.
Renzulli, L.A., & Evans, L. (2005). School choice, charter schools, and White flight . Social Problems, 52(3), 398-418.
39.
RPP International. (2000). The state of charter schools 2000: Fourth-year report. Washington, DC: Author.
40.
Texas Education Agency. (2000). Texas open-enrollment charter schools: Third year evaluation, part 1. Austin: Author.
41.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Stronger accountability: Questions and answers on No Child Left Behind. Washington, DC: Author.
42.
Wamba, N.G., & Ascher, C. (2003). An examination of charter school equity. Education and Urban Society, 35(4), 462-476.
43.
Wayson, W.W. (1999). Charter schools: Franchise for creativity or license for fractionation? Education and Urban Society, 31(4), 446-464.
44.
Weiher, G.R., & Tedin, K.L. (2002). Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preferences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(7), 79-92.
