Objectives: Assisted living programs demonstrate variation in structure and services. The Department of Veterans Affairs funded this care for the first time in the Assisted Living Pilot Program (ALPP). This article presents resident health outcomes and the relationship between facility characteristics and outcomes. Method: This article presents results on 393 ALPP residents followed for 12 months after admission to 95 facilities. Results: A total of 19.8% residents died, and the average activities of daily living impairment did not change significantly. Half of the residents remained in an ALPP facility, with the average resident spending 315 days in the community during the 12-month follow-up period. This article found a limited number of characteristics of structure and staffing to be significantly associated with outcomes. Discussion: If differences among facility characteristics are not clearly related to differences in outcomes, then choices among type of setting can be based on the match of needs to available services, location, or preferences.
Carpenter, D., Sheridan, S., Haenlein, K., & Dean, D. (2006). Environmental scan of instruments to inform consumer choice in assisted living facilities. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
2.
Castle, N.G., & Engberg, J. (2007). The influence of staffing characteristics on quality of care in nursing homes. Health Service Research, 42(5), 1822-1847.
3.
Chapko, M.K., Manheim, L.M., Guihan, M., Sullivan, J., Zhou, X.H., Wang, L., et al. (2009). The Department of Veterans Affairs Assisted Living Pilot Program: Utilization and cost finding?Journal of Aging and Health, [PE: PLS INSERT VOLUME NUMBER], [PE: PLS INSERT PAGE NUMBERS].
4.
Davis, K.J., Sloane, P.D., Mitchell, C.M., Preisser, J., Grant, L., Hawes, M.C., et al. (2000). Specialized dementia programs in residential care settings. The Gerontologist, 40(1), 32-42.
5.
Frytak, J.R., Kane, R.A., Finch, M.D., Kane, R.L., & Maude-Griffin, R. (2001). Outcome trajectories for assisted living and nursing facility residents in Oregon. Health Service Research, 36(1 Pt. 1), 91-111.
6.
Golant, S.M. (2003, November). Translating research on assisted living facilities to policy: Rationale, issues and the need for research. Paper presented at the Pre-Conference Workshop on Assisted Living Research at the Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Diego, CA.
7.
Golant, S.M. (2004). Do impaired older persons with health care needs occupy U.S. assisted living facilities? An analysis of six national studies . Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(2), S68-S79.
8.
Guihan, M., Thomas, M., Mambourg, F., Carney, D., Chapko, M., Wang, L., et al. (2009). VA's Assisted Living Pilot Program: Characteristics of participating facilities, background and methods. Journal of Aging and Health, [PE: PLS INSERT VOLUME NUMBER], [PE: PLS INSERT PAGE NUMBERS].
9.
Hawes, C., Phillips, C.D., & Kimbell, A.M. (2004). The resident assessment instrument for assisted living and residential care (Working Paper LTC #14). College Station: School of Rural Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center.
10.
Hawes, C., Phillips, C.D., Rose, M., Holan, S., & Sherman, M. (2003). A national survey of assisted living facilities . The Gerontologist, 43(6), 875-882.
11.
Hedrick, S.C., Guihan, M., Chapko, M., Manheim, L., Sullivan, J., Thomas, M., et al. (2007). Characteristics of residents and providers in the Assisted Living Pilot Program. The Gerontologist, 47(3), 365-377.
12.
Hedrick, S.C., Sales, A.E., Sullivan, J.H., Gray, S.L., Tornatore, J., Curtis, M., et al. (2003). Resident outcomes of Medicaid-funded community residential care. The Gerontologist, 43(4), 473-482.
13.
Kane, R.A. (1995). Expanding the home care concept: Blurring distinctions among home care, institutional care, and other long-term-care services. Milbank Quarterly, 73(2), 161-186.
14.
Morgan, L.A., Gruber-Baldini, A.L., & Magaziner, J. (2001). Resident characteristics. In S. Zimmerman, P. D. Sloane , & J. K. Eckert (Eds.), Assisted living: Needs, practices, and policies in residential care for the elderly (pp. 144-172). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
Phillips, C., Hawes, C., Greene, A., & Wood, M. (1995). Initial reliability estimates for the Resident Assessment Instrument for Domiciliary Care (final report to the North Carolina Division of Facility Services). Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
16.
Polivka, L. (2003, November). Assisted living research, practice and policy: The status of translational research. Paper presented at Pre-Conference Workshop on Assisted Living Research at the annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Diego, CA.
17.
Pruchno, R.A., & Rose, M.S. (2000). The effect of long-term care environments on health outcomes. The Gerontologist, 40(4), 422-428.
18.
Zimmerman, S., Sloane, P.D., & Eckert, J.K. (2001). Assisted living: Needs, practices, and policies in residential care for the elderly. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Zimmerman, S., Sloane, P.D., Eckert, J.K., Gruber-Baldini, A.L., Morgan, L.A., Hebel, J.R., et al. (2005). How good is assisted living? Findings and implications from an outcomes study. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(4), S195-S204.
