This analysis of peace grant making of U.S. foundations in 1988-1996 is guided by neoinstitutional organizational theory. The author argues that legitimacy concerns underlie the choices foundations make regarding the organizations and causes they fund. Academic and elite recipients give legitimacy to foundations and draw most of the latter’s support. Foundations’ authority in conferring legitimacy is prominent vis-à-vis nonelite organizations, which often seek to mobilize foundation support but receive much less of it than elite grantees do. The overall size of peace grant making was very small in the examined period and declined in constant dollars from 1988 to 1996. The author suggests that foundations were disinclined to fund peace due to normative pressure from the “national security state.” Future research should advance theories about sources of external influence on foundations, paying particular attention to the state’s capacity to shape organizational behavior of foundations and of the nonprofit sector generally.
Alexander, V.
(1998). Environmental constraints and organizational strategies: Complexity, conflict, and coping in the nonprofit sector. In W. Powell & E. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 272-290). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
Anheier, H.
, & Toepler, S. (Eds.). (1999). Private funds, public purpose: Philanthropic foundations in international perspective. New York: Kluwer.
3.
Arnove, R.
(Ed.). (1980). Philanthropy and cultural imperialism: The foundations at home and abroad. Boston: G.K. Hall.
4.
Bothwell, R.
(2001). Philanthropic funding of social change and the diminution of progressive policymaking. In E. Reid & M. Montilla (Eds.), Exploring organizations and advocacy (pp. 67-81), Nonprofit Advocacy and the Policy Process Seminar Series, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
5.
Bulmer, M.
(1999). The history of foundations in the United Kingdom and the United States: Philanthropic foundations in industrial society. In H. Anheier & S. Toepler (Eds.), Private funds, public purpose: Philanthropic foundations in international perspective (pp. 27-54). New York: Kluwer.
6.
Carnegie Corporation of New York
. (1988). Annual report. New York: Author.
7.
Carnegie Corporation of New York
. (1991). Annual report. New York: Author.
8.
Carnegie Corporation of New York
. (1995). Annual report. New York: Author.
9.
Chatfield, C.
(1992). The American peace movement: Ideals and activism. New York: Twayne.
10.
Colwell, M.A.
(1980). The foundation connection: Links among foundations and recipient organizations. In R. Arnove (Ed.), Philanthropy and cultural imperialism: The foundations at home and abroad (pp. 413-452). Boston: G.K. Hall.
11.
Díaz, W.
(1996). The behavior of foundations in an organizational frame: A case study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(4), 453-469.
12.
DiMaggio, P.
, & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
13.
Douglas, J.
(1987). Political theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 43-54). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Edwards, B.
, & Marullo, S. (1995). Organizational mortality in a declining social movement: The demise of peace movement organizations in the end of the cold war era. American Sociological Review, 60(6), 908-927.
15.
Fligstein, N.
(1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Fligstein, N.
, & Byrkjeflot, H. (1996). The logic of employment systems. In J. Baron, D. Grusky, & D. Treiman (Eds.), Social differentiation and social inequality (pp. 11-35). Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Foundation Center
. (1997). International grantmaking: Areport on U.S. foundation trends. New York: Author.
18.
Foundation Center
. (1989-1998). Foundation grants index. New York: Author.
19.
Jenkins, J.C.
(1998). Channeling social protest: Foundation patronage of contemporary social movements. In W. Powell & E. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 206-216). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Jenkins, J.C.
, & Halcli, A. (1999). Grassrooting the system? The development of social movement philanthropy. In E. Lagemann (Ed.), Philanthropic foundations: New scholarship, new possibilities (pp. 227-257). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21.
Karl, B.
, & Katz, S. (1981). The American private philanthropic foundation and the public sphere 1890-1930. Minerva, 19(2), 236-270.
22.
Karl, B.
, & Katz, S. (1987). Foundations and ruling class elites. Dædalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 116(1), 1-40.
23.
Katz, S.
(1999). Where did the serious study of philanthropy come from, anyway?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(1), 74-82.
24.
Klandermans, B.
(1991). The peace movement and social movement theory. International Social Movement Research, 3, 1-39.
25.
Lagemann, E.
(1992). The politics of knowledge: The Carnegie Corporation, philanthropy, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Lord, M.
, & Stewart, M.S. (1997). Trends in peace and security grants: A study of funders’ response to the post–cold war era. Washington, DC: ACCESS.
27.
McCarthy, J.
, & Zald, M. (1987). Social movements in an organizational society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
28.
Meyer, J.
, & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-362.
29.
Meyer, J.
, & Scott, W.R. (1992). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Minkoff, D.
(1993). The organization of survival: Women’s and racial-ethnic voluntarist and activist organizations, 1955-1985. Social Forces, 71(4), 887-908.
31.
Nielsen, W.
(1972). The big foundations. New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
Odendahl, T.
, Boris, E., & Daniels, A. (1985). Working in foundations: Career patterns of women and men. New York: The Foundation Center.
33.
Powell, W.
(1991). Expanding the scope of institutionalist analysis. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183-203). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Powell, W.
, & DiMaggio, P. (Eds.) (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Powell, W.
, & Friedkin, R. (1987). Organizational change in nonprofit organizations. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 180-192). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
Proietto, R.
(1999). The Ford Foundation and women’s studies in American higher education: Seeds of change? In E. Lagemann (Ed.), Philanthropic foundations: New scholarship, new possibilities (pp. 271-284). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
37.
Putnam, R.
(1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
Putnam, R.
(2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
39.
Rosenberg, G.
(1991). The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Rothschild, M.
(1999). Philanthropy and American higher education. In C. Clotfelter & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America (pp. 413-427). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
41.
Roy, W.
(1997). Socializing capital: The rise of the large industrial corporation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
Salamon, L.
(1987). Partners in public service: The scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 99-117). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
Simon, J.
(1987). The tax treatment of nonprofit organizations: A review of federal and state policies. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 67-98). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
Skocpol, T.
, Ganz, M., & Munson, Z. (2000). A nation of organizers: The institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 527-546.
45.
Tarrow, S.
(1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Yergin, D.
(1977). Shattered peace: The origins of the cold war and the national security state. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
47.
Ylvisaker, P.
(1987). Foundations and nonprofit organizations. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 360-379). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
