A survey of U.S. environmental nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) receiving grants in 2000 from private California foundations allowed the authors to evaluate conflicting claims on the impact of foundation funding on nonprofit grantees. Different from the view of elitist critics that foundations co-opt their grant recipients, these NGO respondents view foundations as mildly constructive across several organizational domains. These results are more consistent with pluralist and resource dependency arguments that view foundation donors as supportive of NGO capacity building. Whether the funding impact is cooptation or capacity building has less to do with NGOs' degree of dependency on philanthropic funds and more with grant types received and their organizational traits. Multiyear programmatic grants are associated with capacity-building, whereas 1-year program grants are associated with cooptation. A simplistic interpretation of elitist theory may underestimate the diversity of motivations among funders and the tremendous administrative costs associated with a rigid supervision of grantees.
Aksartova, S. (2003). In search of legitimacy: Peace grant making of U.S. philanthropic foundations, 1988-1996. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(1), 24-46.
2.
Allen, S. (1997a, October 19). The greening of a movement: Big money is bankrolling select environmental causes. The Boston Globe , p. A1.
3.
Allen, S. (1997b, October 20). Conservation law foundation: Firm's growth fueled by foundation grants. The Boston Globe, p. A6.
4.
Allen, S. (1997c, October 20). Environmental donors set tone: Activists affected by quest for funds. The Boston Globe, p. A1.
5.
Arnold, R. (1999). Undue influence: Wealthy foundations, grant-driven environmental groups, and zealous bureaucrats that control your future. Bellevue, WA: The Free Enterprise Press.
6.
Arnove, R.F. (1980). Introduction. In R. F. Arnove (Ed.), Philanthropy and cultural imperialism: The foundations at home and abroad (pp. 1-23). Boston: G. K. Hall.
7.
Bartley, Tim. (2007). How foundations shape social movements: The construction of an organizational field and the rise of forest certification. Social Problems, 54(3): 229-255.
8.
Berman, E.H. (1983). The influence of the Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller Foundations on American foreign policy: The ideology of philanthropy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9.
Bosso, C.J. (1995). The color of money: Environmental groups and the pathologies of fund raising. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (4th ed., pp. 101-130). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
10.
Brulle, R.J. (2000). Agency, democracy, and nature: The U.S. environmental movement from a critical theory perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
11.
Brulle, R.J., & Jenkins, J.C. (2005). Foundations and the environmental movement: Priorities, strategies, and impact. In D. R. Faber & D. McCarthy (Eds.), Foundations for social change: Critical perspectives on philanthropy and social movements (pp. 151-173). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
12.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
13.
Cockburn, A., & St. Clair, J. (1994). Death and life of America's greens. The Nation, 259(21), 760.
14.
Colwell, M.A.C. (1980). The foundation connection: Links among foundations and recipient organizations. In R. F. Arnove (Ed.), Philanthropy and cultural imperialism: The foundations at home and abroad (pp. 413-451). Boston: G. K. Hall.
15.
Colwell, M.A.C. (1993). Private foundations and public policy: The political role of philanthropy. New York: Garland.
16.
Covington, S. (1997). Moving a public policy agenda: The strategic philanthropy of conservative foundations. Washington, DC: National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy.
17.
Dahl, R. (1982). Dilemmas of pluralist democracy: Autonomy vs. control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Delfin, F.G., & Tang, S.Y. (2006). Philanthropic strategies, in place-based, collaborative land conservation: The Packard Foundation's Conserving California Landscape Initiative. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(3), 405-429.
19.
Delfin, F.G., & Tang, S.- Y. (2007). Elitism, pluralism, or resource dependency: Patterns of environmental giving by private California foundations. Environment and Planning A, 39(9): 2167-2186.
20.
Domhoff, G.W. (2002). Who rules America? Power and politics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Domhoff, G.W., & Dye, T.R. (1987). Introduction. In G. W. Domhoff & T. R. Dye (Eds.), Power elites and organizations (pp. 7-17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
Donahue, J. (1990). Environmental board games. Multinational Monitor, 11(3), 10-12.
23.
Douglas, J. (1987). Political theories of nonprofit organization. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 43-54). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
Dowie, M. (1995). Losing ground: American environmentalism at the close of the twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
Dowie, M. (2001). American foundations: An investigative history . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Drabble, L., & Abrenilla, M. (2000). A democratic landscape: Funding social change in California. Washington, DC: National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy.
27.
Dreiling, M., & Wolf, B. (2001). Environmental movement organizations and political strategy: Tactical conflicts over NAFTA. Organization & Environment, 14(1), 34-54.
28.
Dryzek, J.S. (1996). Political inclusion and the dynamics of democratization . American Political Science Review, 90(3), 475-487.
29.
Faber, D.R., & McCarthy, D. (2005). Breaking the funding barriers: Philanthropic activism in support of the environmental justice movement. In D. R. Faber & D. McCarthy (Eds.), Foundations for social change: Critical perspectives on philanthropy and social movements (pp. 151-173). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
30.
Ferris, J., & Mintrom, M. (2002, May). Foundations and public policymaking: A conceptual framework. Paper presented at "Leveraging Philanthropic Assets for Public Problem Solving"-A Forum on Philanthropy, Public Policy, and the Economy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
31.
Fisher, D. (1980). American philanthropy and the social sciences: The reproduction of a conservative ideology. In R. F. Arnove (Ed.), Philanthropy and cultural imperialism: The foundations at home and abroad (pp. 233-268). Boston: G. K. Hall.
32.
Foundation Center. (2002a). Highlights of the Foundation Center's foundation giving trends. Foundations Today Series, 2002 edition. Retrieved July 1, 2004, from http://www.fdcenter.org
33.
Foundation Center. (2002b). Top 50 US foundations awarding grants for environment and animals, circa 2000 . Retrieved July 1, 2004, from http://fdcenter.org/fc_stats/pdf/04_fund_sub/2000/50_found_sub/sub_cd_00.pdf
34.
Gonzalez, G.A. (2001). Corporate power and the environment: The political economy of US environmental policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
35.
Greene, S.G. (1994). Who's driving the environmental movement. Chronicle of Philanthropy, 6, 6-11.
36.
Gronbjerg, K.A., & Martell, L. (with Paarlberg, L.). (2000). Philanthropic funding of human services: Solving ambiguity through the two-stage competitive process. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 9-40.
37.
Hansmann, H. (1987). Economic theories of nonprofit organization. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 27-42). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
Jenkins, J.C. (1987). Nonprofit organizations and policy advocacy. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 296-318). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
Jenkins, J.C. (1998). Channeling social protest: Foundation patronage of contemporary social movements. In W. W. Powell & E. S. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 206-216). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
Jenkins, J.C. (2006). Nonprofit organizations and political advocacy . In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 307-332). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
Jenkins, J.C., & Form, W. (2005). Social movement and social change. In T. Janoski, R. R. Alford , A. M. Hicks, & M. A. Schwartz (Eds.), The handbook of political sociology: States, civil societies, and globalization (pp. 331-349). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Jenkins, J.C., & Halcli, A. (1999). Grassrooting the system? The development and impact of social movement philanthropy 1953-1990. In E. C. Lagemann (Ed.), Philanthropic foundations: New scholarship, new possibilities (pp. 227-256). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
43.
Karl, D.B., & Katz, N. (1987). Foundations and ruling class elites. Daedalus, 116, 1-40.
44.
Knott, J.H., & McCarthy, D. (2007). Policy venture capital: Foundations, government partnerships, and child care programs. Administration and Society, 39(3), 319-353.
45.
Knudson, T. (2001, April 22). Fat of the land; Movement's prosperity comes at a high price. Sacramento Bee, p. A1.
46.
Lehmer, A.G. (1999). The foundations' dilemma. Earth Island Journal, 14(3), 15-16.
47.
Letts, C.W., & Ryan, W.P. (2003). High-engagement: What grantees say about power, performance, and money. Stanford Social Innovation Review , 1(1), 26-33.
48.
Letts, C.W., Ryan, W., & Grossman, A. (1997). Virtuous capital: What foundations can learn from venture capitalists. Harvard Business Review, 75, 2-16.
49.
Lindeman, E. (1935). Wealth & culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
50.
McAdam, D., & Scott, W.R. (2005). Organizations and movements. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam , W. R. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 4-40). New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Nielsen, W. (1996). Inside American philanthropy: The dramas of donorship . Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
52.
Ostrander, S.A. (1987). Elite domination in private social agencies: How it happens and how it is challenged. In G. W. Domhoff & T. R. Dye (Eds.), Power elites and organizations (pp. 85-102). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53.
Ostrower, F. (1995). Why the wealthy give: The culture of elite philanthropy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
Ostrower, F. (2002). Trustees of culture: Power, wealth, and status on elite arts board. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
Peterson Commission. (1970). Foundations, private giving, and public policy: Report and recommendations of the commission on foundations and private philanthropy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
57.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
58.
Powell, W.W., & Friedkin, R. (1987). Organizational change in nonprofit organizations . In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 180-192). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
59.
Prewitt, K. (2006). Foundations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 355-377). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
60.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The challenge and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
61.
Roelofs, J. (2003). Foundations and public policy: The mask of pluralism . Albany: State University New York Press.
62.
Saidel, J.R. (1991). Resource interdependence: The relationship between state agencies and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, 51, 543-553.
63.
Shabecoff, P. (2000). Earth rising: American environmentalism in the 21st century. Washington, DC: Island Press.
64.
Silver, I. (2006). Unequal partnerships: Beyond the rhetoric of philanthropic collaboration. New York: Routledge .
65.
Slaughter, S., & Silva, E.T. (1980). Looking backwards: How foundations formulated ideology in the progressive period. In R. F. Arnove (Ed.), Philanthropy and cultural imperialism: The foundations at home and abroad (pp. 55-86). Boston: G. K. Hall.
66.
Smith, J.A. (2002, May). Foundations and public policymaking: A historical perspective. Paper presented at "Leveraging Philanthropic Assets for Public Problem Solving"-A Forum on Philanthropy, Public Policy, and the Economy, the Center on Philanthropy and Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
67.
Snow, D.P. (1992). Inside the environmental movement: Meeting the leadership challenge. Washington, DC: Island Press.
68.
Tokar, B. (1997). Earth for sale: Reclaiming ecology in the age of corporate greenwash. Boston: South End Press.
69.
Van Til, J. (1988). Mapping the third sector: Voluntarism in a changing social economy. New York: The Foundation Center.
70.
Walker, J. (1991). Mobilizing interest groups in America: Patrons, professions, and social movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
71.
Warren, M.E. (2003). The political role of nonprofits in a democracy . Society, 40(4), 46-51.
72.
Weisbrod, B. (1977). The voluntary non-profit sector: An economic analysis . Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
73.
White, D. (1992). From the ground up. Foundation News, 33(2), 24-31.
74.
Ylvisaker, P.N. (1987). Foundations and nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 360-379). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
75.
Young, D.R. (1987). Executive leadership in nonprofit organization . In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 167-179). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
