Negotiating Accountability: Managerial Lessons from Identity-Based Nonprofit Organizations

Abstract

This article explores the emerging conceptualization of accountability in nonprofit organizations. This definition broadens traditional concerns with finances, internal controls, and regulatory compliance. The authors explore how the top-level managers of 4 identitybased nonprofit organizations (IBNPs) faced accountability and responsiveness challenges to accomplish their mission. The organization-community link was the core relationship in their accountability environment, helping the IBNP managers achieve what the literature calls “negotiated accountability.” The managers favored organizational mechanisms to sustain this relationship in the midst of the accountability demands they experienced daily. Communication with the primary constituency tended to drive the organization’s priorities and programs, helped managers find legitimate negotiation tools with other stakeholders, and helped develop a broader notion of accountability. The authors discuss the implications of these findings for other nonprofit organizations and propose questions to further clarify the concepts of broad accountability, negotiated accountability, and the link between accountability and responsiveness in nonprofits.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Bernstein, S. R. (1991). Managing contracted services in the non-profit agency. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Bogart, W. T. (1995). Accountability and non-profit organizations: An economic perspective. Non-profit Management and Leadership, 6, 157-170.

Boris, E. (1999). Introduction: Non-profit organizations in a democracy. Varied roles and responsibilities. In E. Boris (Ed.), Non-profit and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 3-30). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

Boris, E. , & Mosher-Williams, R. (1998). Non-profit advocacy organizations: Assessing the definitions, classifications, and data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 488-506.

Bowen, W. G. (1994). Inside the boardroom. New York: John Wiley.

Brooks, T. (1995). Accountability: It all depends on what you mean. Clifton, NJ: Akkad Press.

Bryson, J. , & Crosby, B. (1992). Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared-power world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Chavez, L. (1991). Out of the barrio. New York: Basic Books.

10.

Edwards,M. ,& Hulme,D. (1996).Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24, 961-973.

11.

Emery, M. (1999). Searching the theory and practice of making cultural change. Philadelphia: John Benjamin.

12.

Emery, M. , & Purser, R. (1996). The search conference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

13.

Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.

14.

Fry, R. E. (1995). Accountability in organizational life: Problem or opportunity for non-profits? Non-profit Management and Leadership, 6, 181-195.

15.

Galing, S., Jackie, K., Kohnen, J., Sanderson D., & Wang, D. (2000). Accountability at the Brooklyn Museum of Art. Unpublished manuscript, New York University, Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service.

16.

Jenkins, J. C. (1987). Non-profit organizations and policy advocacy. In W. Powell (Ed.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook (pp. 296-318). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

17.

Kearns, K. P. (1996). Managing for accountability: Preserving the public trust in public and non-profit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

18.

LeClerc, G. , Moynagh, W. , Boisclair, J. P. , & Hanson, H. (1996). Accountability, performance reporting, comprehensive audit: An integrated perspective. Ottawa: Canadian Comprehensive Auditing Foundation.

19.

Letts, C. W. , Ryan, W. P. , & Grossman, A. (1999). High performance non-profit organizations: Managing upstream for greater impact. New York: John Wiley.

20.

Parston, G. (1991). Managing for social result: A new framework for public management. Unpublished manuscript, New York University, Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service.

21.

Reid, E. (1999). Non-profit advocacy and political participation. In E. Boris (Ed.), Non-profits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 291-325). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

22.

Romzek, B. S. (1996). Enhancing accountability. In J. Perry (Ed.), Handbook of Public Administration (2nd ed., pp. 97-114). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

23.

Salamon, L. (1999). Government–non-profit relations in international perspective. In E. Boris (Ed.), Non-profits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 329-367). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

24.

Salamon, L. , & Anheimer, H. (1996). The emerging non-profit sector: An overview. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

25.

Smith, S. R. , & Lipsky, M. (1993). Non-profits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

Weisbord, M. , & Janoff, S. (1995). Future search: An action guide to finding common ground in organizations and communities. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

27.

Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222.

28.

Wolch, J. R. (1990). The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. New York: Foundation Center.

29.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.