Although recent calls for increased accountability of the nonprofit sector imply that the role of state regulatory agencies should expand, the costs of expanded regulation to the nonprofit sector—and indirectly to the general public and charitable beneficiaries—are significant, and should not be ignored. This article examines the motivations that state regulators have in promulgating registration and reporting requirements for nonprofit organizations and professional fund-raisers. Examination of six states with no annual requirements for nonprofit organizations or professional fund-raiser registration and financial reporting revealed no obvious accountability pathologies such as unusually high fraudulent activity or abnormally low donations to nonprofit organizations. Because nonprofit accountability in states without annual registration appears as robust as that in other states, the author proposes removal of state regulations requiring nonprofit annual registration and financial reporting. At the very least, the author urges caution in the face of increasing calls form ore stringent state regulation of nonprofit organizations.
Alabama Office of the Attorney General. (2002). News and issues: Pryor announces prison sentence in charity theft. Retrieved February 26, 2002, from www.ago.state.al.us/news.cfm
2.
American Association of Fundraising Counsel Trust for Philanthropy. (2003). Giving USA update: Annual survey of state laws regulating charitable solicitations as of January 1, 2003 (Issue 1). Indianapolis, IN: Author.
3.
Brody, E. (2002, November). Whose public? Parochialism and paternalism in state charity law enforcement. Presentation at annual conference of the Association for Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Montreal, Canada.
4.
California Office of the Attorney General. (1999). Guide to charitable solicitation. Retrieved January 1999 from http://caag.state.ca.us/charities/publications/99char1.pdf
5.
California Office of the Attorney General. (2001). Charitable trusts: About charities search disclaimer. Retrieved January 16, 2002, from http://caag.state.ca.us/charities/disclaimer.htm
6.
Chisolm, L. B. (1995). Accountability of nonprofit organizations and those who control them: The legal framework. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 6(2), 141-156.
7.
Finkler, S. A. (2001). Financial management: For public, health, and not-for-profit organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
Fleischman, J. L. (1999). Public trust in not-for-profit organizations and the need for regulatory reform. In C. T. Clotfelter & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America (pp. 172-197). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
Gary, S. N. (1999). Regulating the management of charities: Trust law, corporate law, and tax law. University of Hawai’i Law Review, 21(2), 593-657.
10.
GuideStar. (2003, October 14). Federal grant to GuideStar funds creation of national charity registry (Press release). Retrieved June 17, 2004, from www.guidestar.org/about/press/10143.jsp
11.
Hopkins, B. R. (1997). Government regulation and charitable fund raising. In D. F. Burlingame (Ed.), Critical issues in fund raising (pp. 211-233). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Hopkins, B. R. (1998). The law of tax-exempt organizations. New York: John Wiley.
13.
Hopkins, B. R., & Tesdahl, D. B. (1997). Intermediate sanctions. New York: John Wiley.
14.
Independent Sector. (2003a). Compendium of standards, codes and principles of nonprofit and philanthropic organizations. Retrieved July 24, 2003, from www.independentsector.org/issues/accountability/standards.html
15.
Independent Sector. (2003b). Value of volunteer time. Retrieved July 13, 2004 from www.independentsector.org/programs/research/volunteer_time.html
16.
Internet Nonprofit Center, The Evergreen State Society. (2003). The Unified Registration Statement: The multi-state filer project. Retrieved from www.nonprofits.org/library/gov/urs/
17.
Kansas Office of the Secretary of State. (2001, November 20). Thornburgh, Stovall, Hubbell launch Kansas charity check Web site. Retrieved September 25, 2002, from www.kssos.org/mediaresources.html%23News
18.
Keating, E. K., & Frumkin, P. (2003). Reengineering nonprofit financial accountability: Toward a more reliable foundation for regulation. Public Administration Review, 63(1), 3-15.
19.
Moore, D. (2001). On accountability: A state charity official’s perspective. In P. Barber (Ed.), Accountability: A challenge for charities and fundraisers (pp. 103-119, New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, Number 31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
National Association of State Charity Officials. (2001, March 14). The Charleston principles: On charitable solicitations using the Internet. Retrieved June 2004 from http://nasconet.org/public/php?pubsec=4&curdoc=10
21.
National Association of State Charity Officials. (2003). NASCO Net proposal (Press release). Retrieved June 2004 from http://nasconet.org/public.php?pubsec=4&sdpid=21&curdoc=264
22.
National Center for Charitable Statistics, Urban Institute. (2000). Reporting public charities in the United States, by state, circa 1999. Retrieved from http://nccs.urban.org/US_st00.pdf
23.
National Center for Charitable Statistics, Urban Institute. (2002). Appendix B: Change in charitable giving by state, based on contributions itemized on individual income tax returns, 1997-2000.Retrieved September 2002 from http://nccs.urban.org
24.
National Telecommunications & Information Administration (NTIA). (2003). NASCONet project narrative (Technology Opportunities Program, NTIA, U.S. Department of Commerce). Retrieved June 17, 2004, from http://ntiaotiant2.ntia.doc.gov/top/docs/nar/pdf/516003006n.pdf
25.
New York Office of the Attorney General. (2001). Pennies for charity: Where your money goes. Retrieved January 16, 2002 from www.oag.state.ny.us/charities/pennies01/penintro.html
26.
New York Office of the Attorney General. (2003). Pennies for charity: Where your money goes. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from www.oag.state.ny.us/charities/pennies03/penintro.html
27.
Ohio Office of the Attorney General. (1996). Attorney General Montgomery goes on the offensive to combat charitable fraud. Retrieved January 16, 2002, from www.ag.state.oh.us/pressrel/charit.htm
28.
Oregon Office of the Attorney General. (2001). Charitable giving; it makes a difference: Oregon Attorney General’s charity profile, 2001. Retrieved February 2002 from www.doj.state.or.us/cas02702.pdf.
29.
Pennsylvania (Commonwealth of), Department of State, Bureau of Charitable Organizations. (2000). 2000 annual report. Retrieved January 17, 2002, from www.dos.state.pa.us/charities
30.
Pennsylvania (Commonwealth of), Department of State, Bureau of Charitable Organizations. (2003). 2003 annual report. Retrieved June 15, 2004, from www.dos.state.pa.us/charities
31.
Perlman, S. (2001). State regulation of fundraising. In J. M. Greenfield (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Fund raising (3rd ed., pp. 1082-1100). New York: John Wiley.
32.
Peters, G. W. (1995). The costs of charitable regulation: What do donors pay? Retrieved January 2, 2002, from www.muridae.com/nporegulation/documents/regulation_costs.html
33.
Pollak, T. H., & Lampkin, L. M. (2001). Nonprofit accountability and the National Center for Charitable Statistics. In P. Barber (Ed.), Accountability: A challenge for charities and fundraisers (pp. 81-102)(New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, Number 31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Rosen, M. J. (2002, March/April). Who should regulate nonprofits?Advancing Philanthropy, 9(2), 8-9.
35.
Salmon, J. L. (2002, September 9). Nonprofits show losses in the public’s trust: Surveys find changes since terror attacks. The Washington Post, p. A2.
36.
Sandoe-Conner, L. L. (2000). Charity fraud: Is the current regulatory system holding the nonprofit sector accountable? Master’s thesis, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
37.
Steinberg, R. (1997). On the regulation of fund raising. In D. F. Burlingame (Ed.), Critical issues in fund raising (pp. 234-244). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
Strom, S. (2003, November 17). New equation for charities: More money, less oversight. The New York Times, F1-F16.
39.
Suhrke, H. C. (1993, December). Should charity regulation be a profit center for state government?Philanthropy Monthly, 26(10), 5-10.
40.
Washington Office of the Secretary of State, Charitable Solicitations Program. (2001). Commercial fundraiser activity report, listed by overall percentage of funds retained by charity clients. Retrieved from www.secstate.wa.gov/charities/.
41.
Wilson, E. W. (1998, July/August). State regulation of charitable solicitation. Probate & Property, 12(4), 48-54.
