How Permeable is the Nonprofit Sector? Linking Resources,Demand,and Government Provision to the Distribution of Organizations Across Nonprofit Mission-Based Fields
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online August, 2010
How Permeable is the Nonprofit Sector? Linking Resources,Demand,and Government Provision to the Distribution of Organizations Across Nonprofit Mission-Based Fields
A large vibrant nonprofit sector is often equated with a civically active and democratically inclined population. Yet, the degree to which different interests and needs are equally activated in a community’s nonprofit sector remains unclear. This article argues that more than the number of nonprofit organizations, the distribution of organizations across nonprofit fields can better represent the plurality of the nonprofit sector and its relationship to democracy. If the sector represents a permeable sphere for the activation of interests through formal voluntary action, one should see a more even nonprofit landscape in communities where there is greater population heterogeneity. Using national data on nonprofit organizations to investigate the determinants of nonprofit heterogeneity in U.S. counties, findings indicate that the nonprofit sector is semipermeable. Although greater population heterogeneity does lead to a more evenly distributed nonprofit sector, resource dependency and resource inequality complicate this relationship.
Abzug, R., & Galaskiewiez, J. (2001). Nonprofit boards: Crucibles of expertise or symbols of local identities? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 51-73.
2.
Alexander, J., Nank, R., & Stivers, C. ( 1999). Implications of welfare reform: Do nonprofit survival strategies threaten civil society? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 452-475.
3.
Anheier, H.K., & Ben-Ner, A. (1997). Shifting boundaries. Long-term changes in the size of the for-profit, nonprofit, cooperative and government sectors. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 68, 335-353.
4.
Ben Ner, A. ( 2002). The shifting boundaries of the mixed economy and the future of the nonprofit sector. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73, 5-40.
5.
Ben Ner, A., & Van Hoomison, T. (1992). An empirical investigation of the joint determination of the size of the for-profit, non-profit, and voluntary sectors. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics , 63, 391-415.
6.
Bielefeld, W., & Murdock, J. ( 2004). The locations of nonprofit organizations and their for profit counterparts. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 33, 221-246.
7.
Bielefeld, W., & Corbin, J. ( 1996). The institutionalization of nonprofit human service delivery . Administration & Society, 28, 362-389.
8.
Bielefeld, W., Murdoch, J., & Waddell, P. ( 1997). The influence of demographics and distance on nonprofit location. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 207-225.
9.
Bielefeld, W. ( 2000). Metropolitan nonprofit sectors: Findings from NCCS data . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 297-314.
10.
Blau, P. ( 1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press .
11.
Blau, J. ( 1989). The shape of culture: A study of contemporary cultural patterns in the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Blau, J. ( 1986). The elite arts, more of less de rigueur: A comparative analysis of metropolitan culture. Social Forces, 64, 875-905.
13.
Boris, E.T. ( 1999). Introduction: Nonprofit organizations in a democracy: Varied roles and responsibilities. In E. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict (pp. 139-162). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
14.
Brooks, A.C. ( 2000). Public subsidies and charitable giving: Crowding out, crowding in, or both?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 19, 451-464.
15.
Carroll, D., & Jones S. K. (in press). Nonprofit revenue diversification: The answer to longevity?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
16.
Chaves, M. ( 1998). The religious ethic and the spirit of nonprofit entrepreneurship . In W. Powell & E. S. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 47-68). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Chaves, M., Stephens, L., Galaskiewicz, J. ( 2004). Does government funding suppress nonprofits’ political activity? American Sociological Review, 69, 292-316.
18.
Corbin, J. ( 1999). A study of factors influencing the growth of nonprofits in social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly , 28, 296-314.
19.
Curtis, J.E., Baer, D.E., & Grabb, E.G. ( 2001) Nations of joiners: Explaining voluntary association membership in democratic societies. American Sociological Review, 66, 783-805.
20.
Deininger, K., & Squire, L. ( 1996). A new data set measuring income inequality. World Bank Economic Review, 10, 565-591.
21.
DiMaggio, P. ( 1987). Nonprofit organizations in the production and distribution of culture. In W Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 195-220). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
DiMaggio, P., & Anheier, H. ( 1990). The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors . Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 137-159.
23.
Douglas, J. ( 1987). Political theories of nonprofit organization. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
Ferris, J. ( 1998). The role of the nonprofit sector in a self-governing society: A view from the United States. Voluntas, 9, 137-151.
25.
Froelich, K.A. ( 1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 246-268.
Galaskieweiz, J., & Bielefeld, W. ( 1998). Nonprofits in an age of uncertainty. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
28.
Gitell, R., & Tebaldi, E. ( 2006). Charitable giving: Factors influencing giving in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 721-736.
29.
Glenmary Research Center. (1990). Churches and church membership in the United States, 1990 (Counties). Accessed 2005.
30.
Glenmary Research Center. (2000). Religious congregations and membership study, 2000 (Counties). Accessed 2005.
31.
Greene, W. ( 2002). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall .
32.
Gronjberg, K. ( 2001). The US nonprofit human service sector: A creeping revolution . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 276-297.
33.
Gronjberg, K. ( 1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
34.
Gronjberg, K., & Paarlberg, L. ( 2002). Extent and nature of overlap between listings of IRS tax-exempt registration and nonprofit incorporation: The case of Indiana. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 565-594.
35.
Gronjberg, K., & Paarlberg, L. ( 2001). Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 684-706.
36.
Gross, R. ( 2003). Giving in America: From charity to philanthropy. In R. Gross (Ed.), Charity, civility, and philanthropy in American history (pp. 29-48). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Hager, M. ( 2001). Financial vulnerability among arts organizations: A test of the Tuckman- Chang measures. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 376-392.
38.
Hager, M., Galaskiewicz, J., Bielefeld, W., & Pino, J. ( 1996). Tales from the grave: Organizations’ accounts of their own demise. American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 975-994.
39.
Hall, P.D. ( 1992). Inventing the nonprofit sector. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
Hansman, H. ( 1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
James, E. ( 1989). The private nonprofit provision of education: A theoretical model and application to Japan. In E. James (Ed.), The nonprofit sector in international perspective: Studies in culture and policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
James, E. ( 1987). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research manual (pp. 397-413). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
Joassart-Marcelli, P., & Wolch, J. ( 2003). The intra-metropolitan geography of poverty and the nonprofit sector in Southern California. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 70-96.
44.
Kaukinen, C., & Fulcher, C. ( 2006). Mapping the social demography and location of HIV services across Toronto neighborhoods. Health and Social Care in the Community, 14, 37-48.
45.
McVeigh, R., Neblett, C., & Shafiq, S. ( 2006). Explaining social movement outcomes: Multi-organizational fields and hate crime reporting. Mobilization, 11(1), 23-49.
46.
McVeigh, R. ( 2004). Structured ignorance and organized racism in the United States. Social Forces, 82, 895-936.
47.
Marcuello, C. ( 1998). Determinants of the nonprofit sector size: An empirical analysis of Spain. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics , 69, 175-192.
48.
Matsunaga, Y., & Yamauchi, N. ( 2004). Is the government failure theory still relevant? Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75, 227-263.
49.
McAdams, D. ( 1999). Political process and the development of Black insurgency . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. ( 1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
51.
Moore, G., Sobieraj, S., Whitt, J.A., Mayorova, O., Beaulieu, D. ( 2002). Elite interlocks in three U.S. sectors: Nonprofit, corporate, and government. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 726-744.
52.
Musick, M., & Wilson, J. ( 2000). Race and formal volunteering: The differential effects of class and religion. Social Forces, 78, 1539-1570.
53.
National Center for Charitable Statistics. ( 1990-2003). IRS 990 Data. Accessed 2007
54.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
55.
Ostrander, S.1989. Private social services: Obstacles to the welfare state ? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18(1), 25-45.
56.
Ostrower, F. ( 1995). Why the wealthy give: The culture of elite philanthropy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Peck, L. ( 2008). Do anti-poverty nonprofits locate where people need them? Evidence from a spatial analysis of phoenix. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 138-151.
58.
Putnam, R. ( 2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
59.
Rosso, H. ( 2006). Hank Rosso’s achieving excellence in fundraising . San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
60.
Saidel, J.R. ( 2002). Nonprofit organizations, political engagement, and public policy (Urban Institute Research Report). Washington DC : Urban Institute Press.
61.
Saidel, J.R. ( 1991). Resource interdependence: The relationship between state agencies and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, 91, 543-553.
62.
Salamon, L. ( 1995). Partners in public service: Government non-profit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
63.
Salamon, L. ( 2002). The resilient sector: The state of nonprofit America . In L. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 3-64). Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press.
64.
Salamon, L. ( 1987). Partners in public service: The scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 99-117). New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
65.
Salamon, L.M., & Anheier, H.K. ( 1997). Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis . Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
66.
Smith, S.R. ( 1999). Government financing of nonprofit activity. In E. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 177-212). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
67.
Smith, S.R. ( 1993). The new politics of contracting: Citizenship and the nonprofit role. In H. Ingram & S. R. Smith (Eds.), Public Policy for Democracy (pp. 198-221). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
68.
Saxton, G., & Benson, M. ( 2005). Social capital and the growth of the nonprofit sector . Social Science Quarterly, 86, 16-35.
69.
Skocpol, T. ( 2004). Voice and inequality: The transformation of American civic democracy. Political Perspectives, 2(1), 3-20.
70.
Skocpol, T., Ganz, M. & Munson, Z. ( 2002). A nation of organizers: The institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States. American Political Science Review, 94, 527-546.
71.
Tuckman, H. & Chang, C. ( 1991). A methodology for measuring the financial vulnerability charitable nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20, 445-460.
72.
Twombly, E. ( 2003). What factors affect the entry and exit of nonprofit human service organizations in metropolitan areas? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 211-235.
73.
US Department of the Census. (1988). Census of governments, 1988. Accessed 2005.
74.
US Department of the Census. (1998). Census of governments, 1998. Accessed 2005.
75.
US Department of the Census. (1990). Decennial census data, 1990. Accessed 2005.
76.
US Department of the Census. (2000). Decennial census data, 2000. Accessed 2005.
77.
Uslaner, E.M., & Brown, M. ( 2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33, 868-894.
78.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., & Brady, H.E. ( 1995). Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79.
Van Til, J. ( 2000). Growing civil society: From nonprofit sector to third space. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
80.
Weisbrod, B. ( 1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. ( 1997). Who cares? Towards an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694-713.
82.
Young, D.R. ( 2000). Alternative models of government-nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 149-172.
