Gender Differences in the Correlates of Volunteering and Charitable Giving

Abstract

Psychological research has found that women score higher on most measures of the traits, motivations, and values that predict helping others, and women are more likely to help family and friends. However, sex differences in the institutional helping behaviors of volunteering and charitable giving are small. This article seeks to explain this apparent contradiction with the hypotheses that men have more resources and more social capital than women, which compensates for their lower level of motivation. The article tests these hypotheses using data from the 1995 Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) survey. The data show partial support for these hypotheses, as men score higher on measures of income, education, trust, and secular social networks. However, women have broader social networks through religious participation.

Keywords

volunteering charitable giving prosocial behavior altruism gender

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andreoni

Brown

Rischall

(2003). Charitable giving by married couples: Who decides and why does it matter? Journal of Human Resources, 38, 111-133.

Ashton

M. C.

Paunonen

S. V.

Helmes

Jackson

D. N.

(1998). Kin altruism, reciprocal altruism, and the big five personality factors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 243-255.

Bekkers

(2005). Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values. Political Psychology, 26, 439-454.

Bekkers

Wiepking

2007. Generosity and philanthropy: A literature review. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from http://papers.ssrn.com/s013/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1015507

Breen

(1996). Regression models: Censored, sample selected, or truncated data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Brown

(2005). Married couples’ charitable giving: Who and why. New Directions in Philanthropic Fundraising, 50, 69-80.

Brown

Ferris

J. M.

(2007). Social capital and philanthropy: An analysis of the impact of social capital on individual giving and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 85-99.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Volunteering in the United States, a supplement to the September 2009 Current Population Survey. Washington, DC: United States Department of Labor. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/volun.pdf

Burgoyne

C. B.

Young

Walker

C. M.

(2005). Deciding to give to charity: A focus group study in the context of the household economy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 15, 383-405.

10.

Capek

M. E. S.

(2005). Documenting women’s giving: Biases, barriers, and benefits. In Clift

(Ed.), Women, philanthropy, and social change: Visions for a just society (pp. 29-60). Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.

11.

Chodorow

(1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.

12.

Chodorow

(1989). Feminism and psychoanalytic theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

13.

Clary

Snyder

(1991). A functional analysis of altruism and prosocial behavior: The case of volunteerism. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 119-148.

14.

Clary

Snyder

Ridge

R. D.

Copeland

Stukas

A. A.

Haugen

. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1516-1530.

15.

Cnaan

R. A.

Kasternakis

Wineburg

R. J.

(1993). Religious people, religious congregations, and volunteerism in human services: Is there a link? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22, 33-51.

16.

Daniels

A. K.

(1988). Invisible careers: Women civic leaders from the volunteer world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

17.

Davis

M. H.

1994. Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: WCB Brown and Benchmark.

18.

Dekker

van den Broek

(1998). Civil society in comparative perspective: Involvement in voluntary associations in North America and Western Europe. Voluntas, 9, 11-38.

19.

Del Barrio

Aluja

Garcia

L. F.

(2004). Relationship between empathy and the big five personality traits in a sample of Spanish adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 677-682.

20.

Eagly

A. H.

Koenig

A. M.

(2006). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: Implication for prosocial behavior. In Dindia

Canary

D. J.

(Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 161-178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

Eckel

C. C.

Grossman

P. J.

(2008). Differences in the economics decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In Plott

C. R.

Smith

V. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics results, Volume 1 (pp. 1061-1076). Linacre House, UK: North-Holland.

22.

Eisenberg

Fabes

R. A.

(1998). Prosocial development. In Damon

(Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 779-862). New York: Wiley.

23.

Erikson

(1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York: Norton.

24.

Fausto-Sterling

(1985). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic Books.

25.

Gerstel

(2000). The third shift: Gender and care work outside the home. Qualitative Sociology, 23, 467-483.

26.

Gilligan

(1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

27.

Graziano

Eisenberg

(1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In Hogan

Johnson

J. W.

Briggs

(Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795-825). New York: Academic Press.

28.

Hook

J. L.

(2004). Reconsidering the division of household labor: Incorporating volunteer work and informal support. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 101-117.

29.

Independent Sector. (2001). Giving and volunteering in the United States: Findings from a national survey. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.

30.

John

O. P.

1990. The “big five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In Pervin

L. A.

(Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.

31.

Kaminer

(1984). Women volunteering: The pleasure, pain, and politics of unpaid work from 1830 to the present. Garden City, New York: Anchor Press.

32.

Keyes

C. L. M.

(1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121-137.

33.

Kohlberg

(1981). Essays on moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

34.

Lee

Piliavin

J. A.

Call

V. R. A.

(1999). Giving time, blood, and money: Differences and similarities. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 276-290.

35.

Marx

J. D.

(2000). Women and human services giving. Social Work, 45, 27-38.

36.

McAdams

D. P.

de Aubin

St. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003-1015.

37.

McAdams

D. P.

de Aubin

St. (1998). Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

38.

Mesch

D. J.

Rooney

P. M.

Steinberg

K. S.

Denton

(2006). The effects of race, gender, and marital status on giving and volunteering in Indiana. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 565-587.

39.

Musick

M. A.

Wilson

(2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

40.

Nagelkerke

N. J. D.

(1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78, 691-692.

41.

Nock

S. L.

Kingston

P. W.

Holian

L. M.

(2008). The distribution of obligations. In Booth

Crouter

A. C.

Bianchi

Seltzer

J. A.

(Eds.), Intergenerational caregiving (pp. 333-340). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

42.

Norris

Inglehart

(2006). Gendering social capital: Bowling in women’s leagues? In O’Neill

Gidengil

(Eds.), Gender and social capital (pp. 73-98). New York: Routledge.

43.

Penner

L. A.

(2002). Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 447-467.

44.

Penner

L. A.

Finkelstein

M. A.

(1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 525-537.

45.

Penner

L. A.

Fritzsche

B. A.

Craiger

J. P.

Freifeld

(1995). Measuring the prosocial personality. In Butcher

J. N.

Spielberger

C. D.

(Eds.), Advances in personality assessment, Vol. 10 (pp. 147-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

46.

Piliavin

J. A.

Callero

(1991). Giving blood: The development of an altruistic identity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

47.

Piper

Schnepf

S. V.

(2008). Gender differences in charitable giving in Great Britain. Voluntas, 19, 103-124.

48.

Regnerus

M. D.

Smith

Sikkink

(1998). Who gives to the poor? The influence of religious tradition and political location on the personal generosity of Americans toward the poor. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 481-493.

49.

Rhoads

S. E.

(2004). Taking sex differences seriously. San Francisco: Encounter Books.

50.

Rooney

Steinberg

K. S.

Schervish

P. G.

(2004). Methodology is destiny: The effect of survey prompts on reported levels of giving and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 628-654.

51.

Rooney

P. M.

Mesch

D. J.

Chin

Steinberg

K. S.

(2005). The effects of race, gender, and survey methodologies on giving in the US. Economics Letters, 86, 173-180.

52.

Rooney

Brown

Mesch

(2007). Who decides in giving to education? A study of charitable giving by married couples. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 7, 229-242.

53.

Rossi

(Ed.). (1985). Gender and the life course. New York: Aldine.

54.

Rossi

A. S.

(Ed.). (2001). Caring and doing for others: Social responsibility in the domains of work, family, and community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

55.

Schwartz

S. H.

(1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279.

56.

Schwartz

S. H.

Fleishman

J. A.

(1978). Personal norms and the mediation of legitimacy effects on helping. Social Psychology, 41, 306-315.

57.

Skoe

E. E. A.

Cumberland

Eisenberf

Hansen

Perry

(2002). The influences of sex and gender-role identity on moral cognition and prosocial personality traits. Sex Roles, 46, 295-309.

58.

Spain

(2001). How women saved the city. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

59.

Taniguchi

(2006). Men’s and women’s volunteering: Gender differences in the effects of employment and family characteristics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 83-101.

60.

Udry

J. R.

Morris

N. M.

Kavenock

(1995). Androgen effects on women’s gendered behavior. Journal of Biosocial Science, 27, 359-368.

61.

Van Der Zee

Thijs

Schakel

(2002). The relationship of emotional intelligence with academic intelligence and the big five. European Journal of Personality, 16, 103-125.

62.

Wilson

(2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215-240.

63.

Wilson

Musick

(1997). Who cares? Towards an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694-713.

64.

Yen

S. T.

(2002). An econometric analysis of household donations in the USA. Applied Economics Letters, 9, 837-841.