Magnetoelastic abrasive grains have low elastic modulus and magnetism, which can create magnetic brushes in magnetic fields. When magnetoelastic abrasive particles come into contact with a workpiece, they can cause deformation, which increases the effective contact surface area and improves machining quality and efficiency. A method for preparing epoxy resin magnetoelastic abrasives was proposed first. The magnetic particle micromorphology was detected through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Secondly, based on the theory of particle-filled composite materials and mechanics, the representative volume element (RVE) model was developed using the finite element software ABAQUS. The size ratio of iron and silicon carbide filler particles, particle shape, and arrangement of stress and strain were found to further improve the magnetoelastic abrasive preparation process. To investigate the effect of time, abrasive size, tool speed, disc speed, and disc spacing on the flank face value, rake face value, and shape factor, double disc magnetic preparation was subjected to magnetoelastic abrasive. Compared to traditional drag finishing methods, the magnetoelastic abrasive demonstrated high efficiency and quality. Exploring the application of magnetoelastic abrasives, new technology and methods of edge preparation, and promoting progress in magnetic efficient processing and magnetic optical finishing technology is of great theoretical and practical value.
KayaSAydinGKarakurtI.An experimental study on the cutting depth produced by abrasive waterjet: how do abrasive and rock properties affect the cutting process?Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 125(9–10): 4811–4823.
2.
AydinGKarakurtIAmiriMR, et al. Improvement of rock cutting performance through two-pass abrasive waterjet cutting. Sustainability2022; 14(19): 12704.
3.
ChenJZhuYWangJ, et al. Relationship between mechanical properties and processing performance of agglomerated diamond abrasive compared with single diamond abrasive. Diam Relat Mater2019; 100: 107595.
4.
SchimmelRJManjunathaiahJEndresWJ.Edge radius variability and force measurement considerations. J Manuf Sci Eng2000; 122: 590–593.
5.
DenkenaBLucasABassettE.Effects of the cutting edge microgeometry on tool wear and its thermo-mechanical load. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol2011; 60(1): 73–76.
6.
RechJYenYCSchaffMJ, et al. Influence of cutting edge radius on the wear resistance of PM-HSS milling inserts. Wear2005; 259(7–12): 1168–1176.
7.
ChildsTHCSekiyaKTezukaR, et al. Surface finishes from turning and facing with round nosed tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol2008; 57: 89–92.
8.
NasrMNANgEGElbestawiMA.Modelling the effects of tool-edge radius on residual stresses when orthogonal cutting AISI 316L. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2007; 47: 401–411.
9.
BiermannDBaschinA.Influence of cutting edge geometry and cutting edge radius on the stability of micromilling processes. Prod Eng2009; 3: 375–380.
10.
UhlmannEOberschmidtDKucheY, et al. Effects of different cutting edge preparation methods on micro milling performance. Procedia CIRP2016; 46: 352–355.
11.
BiermannDAßmuthRSchumannS, et al. Wet abrasive jet machining to prepare and design the cutting edge micro shape. Procedia CIRP2016; 45: 195–198.
12.
VenturaCEHKöhlerJDenkenaB. Cutting edge preparation of PCBN inserts by means of grinding and its application in hard turning. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol2013; 6(4): 246–253.
13.
DenkenaBKöhlerJVenturaCEH, et al. Customized cutting edge preparation by means of grinding. Precis Eng2013; 37(3): 590–598.
14.
AurichJCZimmermannMLeitzL.The preparation of cutting edges using a marking laser. Prod Eng2011; 5: 17–24.
15.
BergsTSchneiderSAMAmaraM, et al. Preparation of symmetrical and asymmetrical cutting edges on solid cutting tools using brushing tools with filament-integrated diamond grits. Procedia CIRP2020; 93: 873–878.
16.
VopátTPodhorskýŠSahulM, et al. Cutting edge preparation of cutting tools using plasma discharges in electrolyte. J Manuf Process2019; 46: 234–240.
17.
AsadM.Effects of tool edge geometry on chip segmentation and exit burr: a finite element approach. Metals2019; 9(11): 1234.
18.
Pérez-SalinasCFDel OlmoALópez deLacalle LN.Estimation of drag finishing abrasive effect for cutting edge preparation in broaching tool. Materials2022; 15(15): 5135.
DenkenaBKöhlerJSchindlerA.Behavior of the magnetic abrasive tool for cutting edge preparation of cemented carbide end mills. Prod Eng2014; 8(5): 627–633.
21.
YamaguchiHSrivastavaAKTanMA, et al. Magnetic abrasive finishing of cutting tools for machining of titanium alloys. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol2012; 61(1): 311–314.
22.
CheungFYZhouZFGeddamA, et al. Cutting edge preparation using magnetic polishing and its influence on the performance of high-speed steel drills. J Mater Process Technol2008; 208(1–3): 196–204.
23.
KarpuschewskiBByelyayevOMaiborodaVS.Magneto-abrasive machining for the mechanical preparation of high-speed steel twist drills. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol2009; 58(1): 295–298.
24.
JiaoALiZQuanH.Experimental research on polishing inner ring groove based on magnetic grinding method. Manuf Technol Mach Tool2015; 8: 114–117.
25.
ShinmuraTTakazawaKHatanoE, et al. Study on magnetic abrasive finishing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol1990; 39(1): 325–328.
26.
YamaguchiHShinmuraTIkedaR.Study of internal finishing of austenitic stainless steel capillary tubes by magnetic abrasive finishing. J Manuf Sci Eng2007; 129(5): 885–892.
27.
ChenYZhouKNiuF.Magnetic grinding and finishing experiment of aero-engine blade disc. J Aerosp Power2015; 30(10): 2323–2330.
28.
FengliNChenYZhangX.Study on preparation process and grinding performance of Fe-based White corununal magnetic abrasive. Ordnance Mater Sci Eng2015; 38(6): 35–40.
29.
SatoTKumCWVenkateshVC.Rapid magneto-rheological finishing of Ti-6Al-4V for aerospace components. Int J Nanomanuf2013; 9(5/6): 431–445.
30.
FangJCJinZJXuWJ, et al. Magnetic electrochemical finishing machining. J Mater Process Technol2002; 129(1–3): 283–287.
31.
ZhangTGuanCZhangC, et al. Predictive modeling and experimental study of generated surface-profile for ultrasonic vibration-assisted polishing of optical glass BK7 in straight feeding process. Ceram Int2021; 47(14): 19809–19823.
32.
BergsTMüllerUVitsF, et al. Grinding wheel wear and material removal mechanisms during grinding of polycrystalline diamond. Procedia CIRP2020; 93: 1520–1525.
33.
PandeyKPandeyPM.Use of chemical oxidizers with alumina slurry in double disk magnetic abrasive finishing for improving surface finish of Si (100). J Manuf Process2018; 32: 138–150.
34.
GuoJFengWJongHJH, et al. Finishing of rectangular microfeatures by localized vibration-assisted magnetic abrasive polishing method. J Manuf Process2020; 49: 204–213.
35.
XuJZouY.Development of a new magnetic abrasive finishing process with renewable abrasive particles using the circulatory system. Precis Eng2021; 72: 417–425.
36.
KhoshanjamAAziziABahramiP, et al. Study on surface roughness and geometrical tolerances of Inconel 718 superalloy polished by magnetic abrasive finishing process. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2023; 237(1–2): 338–349.
37.
AhnBWLeeSH.Run-to-run process control of magnetic abrasive finishing using bonded abrasive particles. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2012; 226(12): 1963–1975.
38.
ChenWCWuKLYanBH, et al. A study on the magneto-assisted spiral polishing on the inner wall of the bore with magnetic hot melt adhesive particles (MHMA particles). Int J Adv Manuf Technol2013; 69(5–8): 1791–1801.
39.
ChenWCWuKLYanBH.A study on the application of newly developed magneto-elastic abrasive to improving the surface roughness of the bore. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2014; 73(9–12): 1557–1566.
40.
SoorajVSRadhakrishnanV.Fine finishing of internal surfaces using elastic abrasives. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2014; 78: 30–40.
41.
SoorajVS.Concept and mechanics of fine finishing circular internal surfaces using deployable magneto-elastic abrasive tool. J Manuf Sci Eng2017; 139(8): 741–753.
42.
WangDLiXLiW, et al. Preparation of viscoelastic magnetic abrasive tool based on 107 silicone rubber and experimental study. Surf Technol2018; 47(6): 258–264.
43.
KumarMSidparaAMRacherlaV.Finishing of OFHC copper using fluid filled open-cell porous flexible abrasive impregnated tools. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2023; 237(6–7): 1086–1099.
44.
CuiTZhangGCuiY, et al. Effect of atomizing rapid solidification spherical abrasive finishing on the surface quality of copper-nickel alloy. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2021; 235(12): 2004–2014.
45.
Dehghan GhadikolaeiAVahdatiM. Experimental study on the effect of finishing parameters on surface roughness in magneto-rheological abrasive flow finishing process. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2015; 229(9): 1517–1524.
46.
KucharskiMChmiel-SzukiewiczE.Reactions of trithiocyanuric acid with oxiranes. II. Kinetics and mechanism of reactions. J Appl Polym Sci2000; 78: 2081–2088.
47.
DušekKDušková-SmrčkováM.Network structure formation during crosslinking of organic coating systems. Prog Polym Sci2000; 25(9): 1215–1260.
48.
KalaPSharmaVPandeyPM.Surface roughness modelling for double disk magnetic abrasive finishing process. J Manuf Process2017; 25: 37–48.
49.
KumCWSatoTGuoJ, et al. A novel media properties-based material removal rate model for magnetic field-assisted finishing. Int J Mech Sci2018; 141: 189–197.
50.
KalaPPandeyPM.Experimental study on finishing forces in double disk magnetic abrasive finishing process while finishing paramagnetic workpiece. Procedia Mater Sci2014; 5: 1677–1684.
51.
DenkenaBBiermannD.Cutting edge geometries. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol2014; 63(2): 631–653.
52.
DenkenaBKöhlerJBreidensteinB, et al. Influence of the cutting edge preparation method on characteristics and performance of PVD coated carbide inserts in hard turning. Surf Coat Technol2014; 254: 447–454.
53.
LvDWangYYuX.Effects of cutting edge radius on cutting force, tool wear, and life in milling of SUS-316L steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 111(9–10): 2833–2844.
