Design and evaluation of vibration reducing seat suspension based on negative stiffness structure

Abstract

The vibration transmitted to helicopter aircrew is the main health risk, specifically at low excitation frequencies. In this paper, to improve the vibration environment for aircrew, a seat suspension using a negative stiffness structure has been proposed. The main feature of the proposed system is the negative stiffness structure along with a traditional positive stiffness structure. Here, the dynamic model of the proposed system is derived and the design procedure for the seat suspension parameters is presented in order to mitigate the vibration transmitted to occupant and at the same time preserving payload capacity of the system. Then, the vibration transmitted to seat as well as the transmissibility of the proposed system at the steady state are evaluated using ISO-2631 and conventional criteria. To verify the validity of the simulation results, the reproduced signal of the cabin floor of the Bell-412 helicopter is applied. Results reveal that the isolation performance of the proposed system based on the negative stiffness structure is well-suited so that the values of root mean square and vibration dose value for seat’s vertical vibration in this structure are 0.0789 and 0.1254, respectively. It showed an almost 90% reduction of amplitude with respect to the cabin floor’s vibration. Also, according to the ISO-2631 standard, the level of comfort is improved from uncomfortable to not uncomfortable that represents the promotion of riding quality and improvement of vibration environment for aircrew. As well as results display that the frequency spectrum of the cabin floor and the seat are similar to each other and actually frequency modulation does not happen in the vibration transfer path between the cabin floor and over the seat.

Keywords

Negative stiffness structure seat suspension system whole body vibration pilot seat vibration damping

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rasuo

. Experimental techniques for evaluation of fatigue characteristics of laminated constructions from composite materials: full-scale testing of the helicopter rotor blades. J Test Eval 2011; 39: 237–242.

Chen

Wickramasinghe

Zimcik

, et al. Development of adaptive seat mounts for helicopter aircrew body vibration reduction. J Vib Control 2009; 15: 1809–1825.

Chen

Wickramasinghe

Zimcik

, et al. Development of adaptive helicopter seat for aircrew vibration reduction. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2011; 22: 489–502.

Adam J. Results of NVG-induced neck strain questionnaire study in CH-146 Griffon aircrew. Report, Defence Research and Development, Toronto, Canada, November 2004.

Brammer AJ and Peterson DR. Vibration, mechanical shock, and impact. In: Standard handbook of biomedical engineering and design. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004, pp.10.1–10.27.

Van den Oord M. Prevention of flight-related neck pain in military aircrew. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2012.

Thomae

Porteous

Brock

, et al. Back pain in Australian military helicopter pilots: a preliminary study. J Aviat Sp Environ Med 1998; 69: 468–473.

Shanahan

Reading

TJA

. Helicopter pilot back pain: a preliminary study. J Aviat Sp Environ Med 1984; 55: 117–121.

Chen

Wickramasinghe

Zimcik

. Investigation of helicopter seat structural dynamics for aircrew vibration mitigation. J Am Hel Soc 2011; 56: 12006–12006.

10.

Ji X. Evaluation of suspension seats under multi-axis vibration excitations-a neural net model approach to seat selection. PhD Thesis, The University of Western Ontario, Canada, 2015.

11.

Wickramasinghe VK. Dynamics control approaches to improve vibratory environment of the helicopter aircrew. PhD Thesis, Carleton University, Canada, 2013.

12.

Rasuo B. On structural damping of composite aircraft structures. In: Comprehensive composite materials II. New York: Elsevier Science, 2018, pp.288–299.

13.

Rasuo

. Experimental study of structural damping of composite helicopter blades with different cores. Plast Rubber Compos 2010; 39: 1–5.

14.

Nguyen

Choi

S-BJMS

, et al. A hybrid clustering based fuzzy structure for vibration control–Part 2: an application to semi-active vehicle seat-suspension system. Mech Syst Sig Process 2015; 56: 288–301.

15.

Landgrebe AJ and Davis MW. Analysis of potential helicopter vibration reduction concepts. In: Proceeding of the 2nd decennial specialists’ meeting on rotorcraft dynamics, California, USA, 7–9 November 1985, paper no. 86N15302, pp.343–363.

16.

Ilić

Jovanović

, et al. The efficiency of passive vibration damping on the pilot seat of piston propeller aircraft. Measurement 2017; 95: 21–32.

17.

Sun

Jing

XJMS

Processing

. A nonlinear vibration isolator achieving high-static-low-dynamic stiffness and tunable anti-resonance frequency band. Mech Syst Sig Process 2016; 80: 166–188.

18.

Virgin

Santillan

Plaut

, et al. Vibration isolation using extreme geometric nonlinearity. J Sound Vib 2008; 315: 721–731.

19.

Santillan

Virgin

Plaut

, et al. Equilibria and vibration of a heavy pinched loop. J Sound Vib 2005; 288: 81–90.

20.

Chin

Lee

Winterflood

, et al. Low frequency vertical geometric anti-spring vibration isolators. Phys Lett A 2005; 336: 97–105.

21.

Plaut

Favor

Jeffers

, et al. Vibration isolation using buckled or pre-bent columns—Part 1: two-dimensional motions of horizontal rigid bar. J Sound Vib 2008; 310: 409–420.

22.

Hostens

Deprez

Ramon

, et al. An improved design of air suspension for seats of mobile agricultural machines. J Sound Vib 2004; 276: 141–156.

23.

du Plooy

Heyns

Brennan

. The development of a tunable vibration absorbing isolator. Int. J Mech Sci 2005; 47: 983–997.

24.

Carrella

Brennan

Waters

, et al. On the design of a high-static–low-dynamic stiffness isolator using linear mechanical springs and magnets. J Sound Vib 2008; 315: 712–720.

25.

Carrella

Brennan

Waters

. Demonstrator to show the effects of negative stiffness on the natural frequency of a simple oscillator. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science 2008; 222: 1189–1192.

26.

Griffin

. Handbook of human vibration, 1st ed. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2012.

27.

Rosenberger

Liphardt

A-M

Bargmann

, et al. EMG and heart rate responses decline within 5 days of daily whole-body vibration training with squatting. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e99060–e99060.

28.

Hoy

Mubarak

Nelson

, et al. Whole body vibration and posture as risk factors for low back pain among forklift truck drivers. J Sound Vib 2005; 284: 933–946.

29.

Friesenbichler

Nigg

Dunn

. Local metabolic rate during whole body vibration. J Appl Physiol 2013; 114: 1421–1425.

30.

Newell

Mansfield

. Evaluation of reaction time performance and subjective workload during whole-body vibration exposure while seated in upright and twisted postures with and without armrests. Int J Ind Ergon 2008; 38: 499–508.

31.

ISO. Mechanical vibration and shock: evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration. Part 1, General requirements: International Standard ISO 2631-1: 1997 (E), Geneva: ISO, 1997.

32.

Knothe K and Stichel S. Human perception of vibrations-ride comfort. In: Knothe K and Stichel S (eds) Rail vehicle dynamics. New York: Springer, 2017, pp.141–157.

33.

Grabau PJ. The simulation of vibrations experienced by patients during helicopter winching and retrieval. PhD Thesis, James Cook University, Australia, 2016.

34.

Zhang

, et al. Environmental vibration assessment and its applications in accelerated tests for medical devices. J Sound Vib 2003; 2: 371–383.

35.

Donati

. Survey of technical preventative measures to reduce whole-body vibration effects when designing mobile machinery. J Sound Vib 2002; 253: 169–183.