The upper-limb exoskeleton is capable of enhancing human arm strength beyond normal levels, whereas deriving the operator’s desired action straightforward turns out to be one of the significant difficulties facing human-robot interaction research. In the study, the human-robot interface was presented to regulate the exoskeleton tracking human elbow motion trajectory that employed the contact force signals between the exoskeleton and its operator as the primary means of information transportation. The signals were recorded by adopting the novel soft skin sensors attached to the bracket on the exoskeleton linkage, which could reflect the human arm motion intention through the virtual admittance model and adaptive control. Subsequently, a 1-DOF upper-limb exoskeleton was designed to illustrate the performance of the proposed sensor and the interaction control method in the human-robot cooperation experiment.
HeWWangTHeX, et al. Dynamical modeling and boundary vibration control of a rigid-flexible wing system. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2020; 25: 2711–2719.
2.
HeWMuXZhangL, et al. Modeling and trajectory tracking control for flapping-wing micro aerial vehicles. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sinica2021; 8: 148–156.
3.
YuXHeWLiH, et al. Adaptive fuzzy full-state and output-feedback control for uncertain robots with output constraint. In: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. New York: IEEE. DOI:10.1109/TSMC.2019.2963072.
4.
XinfengGXingchenLYaoS, et al. Model-free tracking control of continuum manipulators with global stability and assigned accuracy. In: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. New York: IEEE. DOI:10.1109/TSMC.2020.3018756.
5.
GoodrichMASchultzAC.Human-robot interaction: a survey. Found Trends Hum Comput Interact2007; 1: 203–275.
6.
WuXLiZKanZ, et al. Reference trajectory reshaping optimization and control of robotic exoskeletons for human-robot co-manipulation. IEEE Trans Cybern2020; 50: 3740–3751.
7.
SmithTBenardosPBransonD.Assessing worker performance using dynamic cost functions in human robot collaborative tasks. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2019; 234: 289–301.
8.
HuangBLiZWuX, et al. Coordination control of a dual-arm exoskeleton robot using human impedance transfer skills. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Syst2019; 49: 954–963.
9.
LeeHDLeeBKKimWS, et al. Human-robot cooperation control based on a dynamic model of an upper limb exoskeleton for human power amplification. Mechatronics2014; 24: 168–176.
10.
ChoiDHo OhJ.Development of the Cartesian arm exoskeleton system (caes) using a 3-axis force/torque sensor. Int J Control Autom Syst2013; 11: 976–983.
11.
TuXZhouXLiJ, et al. Iterative learning control applied to a hybrid rehabilitation exoskeleton system powered by PAM and FES. Cluster Comput2017; 20: 2855–2868.
12.
WuQWangXDuF, et al. Modeling and position control of a therapeutic exoskeleton targeting upper extremity rehabilitation. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2016; 231: 1–14.
13.
WuQWangXDuF.Development and analysis of a gravity-balanced exoskeleton for active rehabilitation training of upper limb. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2015; 230: 1–14.
14.
PonsJ.Wearable robots: biomechatronic exoskeletons. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
15.
RehmatNZuoJMengW, et al. Upper limb rehabilitation using robotic exoskeleton systems: a systematic review. Int J Intell Robot Appl2018; 2: 283–295.
16.
HamayaMMatsubaraTNodaT, et al. Learning assistive strategies for exoskeleton robots from user-robot physical interaction. Pattern Recognit Lett2017; 99: 67–76.
17.
LaffranchiMChenLKashiriN, et al. Development and control of a series elastic actuator equipped with a semi active friction damper for human friendly robots. Robot Autonom Syst2014; 62: 1827–1836.
18.
StienenwAHAHekmanEEGter BraakH, et al. Design of a rotational hydroelastic actuator for a powered exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2010; 57: 728–735.
19.
HyonSHHaleJGChengG.Full-body compliant human-humanoid interaction: balancing in the presence of unknown external forces. IEEE Trans Robot2007; 23: 884–898.
20.
GopuraRBandaraDKiguchiK, et al. Developments in hardware systems of active upper-limb exoskeleton robots: a review. Robot Autonom Syst2016; 75: 203–220.
21.
Jia-FanZCan-JunYYingC, et al. Modeling and control of a curved pneumatic muscle actuator for wearable elbow exoskeleton. Mechatronics2018; 18: 448–457.
22.
YangHChenYSunY, et al. A novel pneumatic soft sensor for measuring contact force and curvature of a soft gripper. Sensors Actuat A: Phys2017; 266: 318–327.
23.
LongYDuZChenC, et al. Development and analysis of an electrically actuated lower extremity assistive exoskeleton. J Bionic Eng2017; 14: 272–283.
24.
ChengNLowJHAngBWK, et al. Soft fabric-based pneumatic sensor for bending angles and contact force detection. IEEE Sensors J2019; 19: 1269–1279.
25.
HuarotoJJSuarezEKrebsHI, et al. A soft pneumatic actuator as a haptic wearable device for upper limb amputees: toward a soft robotic liner. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2019; 4: 17–24.
26.
CirilloAFicucielloFNataleC, et al. A conformable force/tactile skin for physical human-robot interaction. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2016; 1: 41–48.
27.
WongRDPPosnerJDSantosVJ.Flexible microfluidic normal force sensor skin for tactile feedback. Sensors Actuat A: Phys2012; 179: 62–69.
28.
YangCJZhangJFChenY, et al. A review of exoskeleton-type systems and their key technologies. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2012; 222: 1599–1612.
29.
ZhangJFYangCJChenY, et al. Modeling and control of a curved pneumatic muscle actuator for wearable elbow exoskeleton. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2008; 18: 448–457.
30.
XinfengGYaoSLinaH, et al. A new soft pneumatic elbow pad for joint assistance with application to smart campus. IEEE Access2018; 6: 38967–38976.
31.
ZhangLGuoSYuH, et al. Performance evaluation of a strain-gauge force sensor for a haptic robot-assisted catheter operating system. Microsyst Technol2017; 23: 5041–5050.
32.
YangHGaoXChenY, et al. Hammerstein adaptive impedance controller for bionic wrist joint actuated by pneumatic muscles. IEEE Access2019; 7: 47–56.
33.
BaserODemirayMA.Selection and implementation of optimal magnetorheological brake design for a variable impedance exoskeleton robot joint. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2017; 231: 941–960.
34.
ChinimilliPTQiaoZSorkhabadiSMR, et al. Automatic virtual impedance adaptation of a knee exoskeleton for personalized walking assistance. Robot Autonom Syst2019; 114: 66–76.
35.
HaoLZhaoZLiX, et al. Preparation and property analysis of melamine formaldehyde foam. Int J Adv Robot Syst2020. DOI:10.1177/1729881420937570.
36.
Hao L, Zhao Z, Li X, et al. A safe human -robot interactive control structure with human arm movement detection for an upper-limb wearable robot used during lifting tasks. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 2020; 17: 172988142093757.DOI:10.1177/1729881420937570.
