Comparison of dynamic effects of high-speed traffic load on ballasted track using a simplified two-dimensional and full three-dimensional model

Abstract

The vertical dynamic actions transmitted by railway vehicles to the ballasted track infrastructure are evaluated taking into account models with different degrees of detail. In particular, this matter has been studied from a two-dimensional finite-element model to a fully coupled three-dimensional multibody finite-element model. The vehicle and track are coupled via a nonlinear Hertz contact mechanism. The method of Lagrange multipliers is used for the contact constraint enforcement between the wheel and rail. Distributed elevation irregularities are generated based on power spectral density distributions, which are taken into account for the interaction. Due to the contact nonlinearities, the numerical simulations are performed in the time domain, using a direct integration method for the transient problem. The results obtained include contact forces, forces transmitted to the infrastructure (sleeper) by railpads, and envelopes of relevant results for several track irregularities and speed ranges. The main contribution of this work is to identify and discuss coincidences and differences between discrete two-dimensional models and continuum three-dimensional models, as well to assess the validity of evaluating the dynamic loading on the track with simplified two-dimensional models.

Keywords

Dynamic response infinite element track irregularities vehicle–track interaction wheel–rail contact

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

European Committee for Standardization, European Union. EN 1991–2:2003, Eurocode 1: actions on structures - part 2: traffic loads on bridges. CEN, Brussels, 2003.

European Committee for Standardization, European Union. EN 1990:2002/A1:2005–Eurocode–basis of structural design. Annex A2. Application for bridges. CEN, Brussels, 2005.

European Railway Agency, European Union. Technical specification for interoperability relating to the infrastructure sub-system of the trans-European high-speed rail system. ERA, 2007.

Knothe

Grassie

. Modelling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies. Veh Syst Dyn 1993; 22(3-4): 209–262.

Dahlberg

. Vertical dynamic train/track interaction – verifying a theoretical model by full-scale experiments. Veh Syst Dyn 1995; 24(1): 45–57.

Cai

Raymond

. Modelling the dynamic response of railway track to wheel/rail impact loading. Struct Eng Mech 1994; 2: 95–112.

Zhai

Cai

. Dynamic interaction between a lumped mass vehicle and a discretely supported continuous rail track. Comp Struct 1997; 63: 987–997.

Sun

Dhanasekar

. A dyanmic model for the interaction of the rail track and wagon system. Int J Solids Struct 2002; 39: 1337–1359.

Esveld

. Modern railway track. MRT Productions 2001.

10.

Lei

Noda

. Analyses of dynamic response of vehicle and track coupling system with random irregularity of track vertical profile. J Sound Vib 2002; 258: 147–165.

11.

Lou

Zeng

. Vertical vehicle track coupling element. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2006; 220(3): 293–304.

12.

Yang

. Enhancement of the finite-element method for the analysis of vertical train-track interactions. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2009; 223(6): 609–620.

13.

Popp

Kaiser

Kruse

. System dynamics of railway vehicles and track. Archive Appl Mech 2003; 72: 949–961.

14.

Sun

Dhanasekar

Roach

. A three dimensional model for the lateral and vertical dynamics of wagon track systems. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2003; 217(1): 31–45.

15.

Kumaran

Menon

Nair

. Dynamic studies of railways sleepers in a track structure system. J Sound Vib 2003; 286: 485–501.

16.

Lundqvist

Dahlberg

. Load impact on railway track due to unsupported sleepers. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2005; 219: 67–77.

17.

Sun

Simson

. Nonlinear three dimensional wagon track model for the investigation of rail corrugation initiation on curved track. Veh Syst Dyn 2007; 45(2): 113–132.

18.

Zhai

Wang

Cai

. Fundamentals of vehicle track coupled dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn 2009; 47(11): 1349–1376.

19.

Dahlberg

. Railway track stiffness variations consequences and countermeasures. Int J Civil Eng 2010; 8(1): 1–12.

20.

Dassalt Systemes SIMUIA Corp. ABAQUS analysis user's manualv, 6.11. Dassalt Systemes SIMULIA Corp., 2011.

21.

Ishida

Suzuki

. Effect on track settlement of interaction exited by leading and trialing axles. QR of RTRI 2005; 46(1)

22.

Knothe

. Receptance behaviour of railway track and subgrade. Archive Appl Mech 1998; 68: 457–470.

23.

Melis M. Embankments and ballast in high speed rail. Fourth part: high-speed railway alignments in Spain. Certain alternatives. Revista Obras Públicas 2007; 3476: 41–66.

24.

Zhai

Wang

Lin

. Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations. J Sound Vib 2004; 270(4–5): 673–683.

25.

Costa

PMBA

. Vibrações do sistema via-maciço induzidas por tráfego ferroviário. Modelação numérica e validação experimental, Porto: Universidade do Porto, 2011.

26.

Chopra

. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, 2000.

27.

Liu

Zhang

. Influence of track parameters on rail frequency response function based on analytical solution. In: Advances in environmental vibration – proceedings of the fifth international symposium on environmental vibration, Science Press, 2011, pp. 700–706.

28.

Clauss

Schiehlen

. Modeling and simulation of railways bogie structural vibrations. Veh Syst Dyn 1998; 29(1): 538–552.

29.

European Committee for Standardization, European Union. EN 13848-5:2008 railway applications–track–track geometry quality part5:geometric quality levels. CEN, Brussels, 2008.

30.

Johnson

. Contact mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

31.

Ministerio de Fomento de España. “Instrucción de acciones a considerar en el proyecto de puentes de ferrocarril (IAPF)”. Dirección General de Ferrocarriles, Madrid, 2007.