Method for validating the train motion equations used for passenger rail vehicle simulation

Abstract

Train simulation software is conventionally validated by checking simulation results against equivalent data collected from real train runs. It is typically expected that these results will be within 5–10% accuracy of the recorded data. However, such a large margin could allow errors in the programming to be overlooked, resulting in an inaccurate model. This paper presents a method for error checking and validating the kinematics of train simulators based on comparison with calculated results, which are found by solving the fundamental equations governing train motion. A typical train run comprises of a combination of two or more of the four stages: accelerating, cruising, coasting and braking. Each stage is considered as a separate scenario for which the equations must be solved, in order to find the running time, distance travelled and energy consumption of the vehicle. This validation method is applied to two train movement simulators currently used for research. Certain specific scenarios for which analytical solutions are available are run in each simulator. The differences from the analytical solution in each test case are quantified, allowing the simulators to be compared to each other and the exact solution.

Keywords

Simulation validation vehicle dynamics equations of motion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Watson R. Train planning in a fragmented railway. PhD, Loughborough University, UK. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/4485 (accessed 4 February 2015).

Nash

Huerlimann

Railroad simulation using OpenTrack. In: Allan

Brebbia

Hill

(eds). WIT transactions on the built environment: Computers in Railways IX, Southampton: WIT Press, 2004.

A multi-train movement simulator with moving block signalling. In: Brebbia

Allan

Hill

(eds). WIT transactions on the built environment: Computers in Railways VI, Southampton: WIT Press, 1998.

Hillmansen

Roberts

. Energy storage devices in hybrid railway vehicles: A kinematic analysis. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2007; 221: 135–143.

Banks

Principles of simulation. In: Banks

(ed). Handbook of simulation: Principles, methodology, advances, applications and practice, Chichester: Wiley-Interscience, 1998, pp. 3–30.

Julich PM, Martin CG, Brazelton SL, et al. Evaluating the potential benefits of a rail traffic movement planning algorithm. In: Simulation conference proceedings, 1999, pp.1181–1185.

Fella T, Goodman C and Weston P. Validation of multi train simulation software. In: IET conference on railway traction systems (RTS 2010), 13–15 April 2010, pp.1–4.

Kirkwood D. Simulation, test and performance evaluation of railway control strategies and algorithms. PhD, University of Birmingham, UK.

Bocharnikov

Tobias

Roberts

. Optimal driving strategies for traction energy saving on DC suburban railways. IEEE Electr Power Appl 2007; 1: 675–682.

10.

Hillmansen

. Single-train trajectory optimization. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 2013; 14: 743–750.

11.

Allan J, Chan WS, Mellitt B, et al. Developments in multi-train simulation by London Underground Limited and Hong Kong Mass Transit Railway Corporation. In: Third international conference on computer aided design, manufacture and operation in railway and other advanced mass transit systems, Computational Mechanics Publication, 1992, vol. 1, pp.425–437.

12.

Radtke AL and Bendfeldt J. Handling of railway operation problems with RailSys. In: Proceedings of world congress on railway research, Köln, Germany, 2001.

13.

Siefer

Simulation. In: Hansen

Pachl

(eds). Railway timetable and traffic, Hamburg: Eurailpress, 2008.

14.

SMA und partner AG: http://www.sma-partner.ch/en/solutions/viriato-and-zlr/overview (accessed 30 July 2014).

15.

Gille

Klemenz

Siefer Th

Applying multiscaling analysis to detect capacity resources in railway networks. In: Allan

Erias

Brebbia

(eds). Computers in Railways XI, Southampton: WIT Press, 2008, pp. 595–604.

16.

Cacchiani

Huisman

Kidd

. An overview of recovery models and algorithms for real-time railway rescheduling. Transport Res Part B 2014; 63: 15–37.

17.

Goodman CJ, Siu L and Ho TK. A review of simulation models for railway systems. In: International conference on developments in mass transit systems, London, UK, 1998, pp.80–85.

18.

Mao

Yuan

. Computer simulation and modeling in railway applications. Comput Phys Commun 2002; 143: 1–10.

19.

Lomonossoff

. Introduction to railway mechanics, Humphrey Milford, London: Oxford University Press, 1933.

20.

Lomonossoff

. Diesel locomotives. Translated from Russian by E Mrongovius, Berlin: VDI Verlag, 1929. (reprinted 1985).

21.

Rochard

Schmid

. A review of methods to measure and calculate train resistances. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2000; 214: 185–199.

22.

Network Rail, n.d., Gradients. http://www.networkrail.co.uk/aspx/10556.aspx (accessed 22 January 2015).

23.

Brunger

Dahlhaus

Running time estimation. In: Hansen

Pachl

(eds). Railway timetable and traffic, Hamburg: Eurail Press, 2008, pp. 58–82.

24.

Min

Yang

Wang

. Knowledge-based method for the validation of complex simulation models. Simulat Model Pract Theory 2009; 18: 500–515.

25.

Öztürk

Rende

İnce

. A general railway data model for simulations and simulators. Simulation 2014; 90: 833–849.

26.

Koutsopoulos H and Wang Z. Simulation of urban rail operations: Models and applications. In: 11th world conference on transportation research (WTCR), Berkeley, CA, USA, 2007.