Various investigations on open rotor (OR) hovering in-ground effect (IGE) are carried out, but few papers report shrouded rotor (SR) hovering IGE. This paper compares aerodynamic performance and flowfield characteristics of OR and SR hovering IGE by both experimental measurements and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations. Experimental results reveal that in IGE flight, the aerodynamic performance of SR is more sensitive than that of OR. And at constant power, SR offers more thrust than OR at the same ground distance. Ground has a great influence on thrust for OR below 2.2 rotor radius distance, while for SR it shows obvious effect below 1.5 rotor radius distance. It is also shown that normalized aerodynamic coefficients of OR and SR are independent on rotor speed. In addition, for OR the rotor thrust coefficient changes nearly linearly with the logarithmic distance from ground, while for SR it changes nonlinearly. Flowfield analysis by CFD shows that shroud changes the tip flow features and expands the slipstream area of SR. When ground distance gets small, back pressure below the rotor-disk plane increases, which is more obvious for SR than OR. Furthermore, shroud thrust of SR decreases because of tip leakage flow and flow separation.
SibilskiKPietruchaJZlockaM. Comparative evaluation of power requirements for fixed, rotary, and flapping wings micro air vehicles. In: AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference and exhibit, Hilton Head, SC, USA, 20–23 August 2007.
5.
PipenbergBTMaughmerMD. Experimental analysis of power requirements for fixed-, flapping-, and rotary-wing micro air vehicles. In: AIAA SciTech forum: 52nd aerospace sciences meeting, National Harbor, MD, USA, 13–17 January 2014.
6.
BohorquezFSamuelPSirohiJ, et al. Design, analysis and hover performance of a rotary-wing micro air vehicle. J Am Helicopter Soc2003; 48: 80–90.
7.
NgTTHLengGSB.Design optimization of rotary-wing micro air vehicles. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2006; 220: 865–873.
8.
TorresGEMuellerTJ.Aerodynamic characteristics of low aspect ratio wings at low Reynolds numbers. Fixed Flapp Wing Aerodyn Micro Air Veh Appl2001; 195: 115–141.
9.
Green, WilliamEY. OhP. A fixed-wing aircraft for hovering in caves, tunnels, and buildings. In: American control conference. Piscataway: IEEE, 2006, pp. 1092–1097.
10.
LeishmanJG.Principles of helicopter aerodynamics. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
11.
JohnsonW.Rotorcraft aeromechanics. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
12.
LeeTELeishmanJGRamasamyM.Fluid dynamics of interacting blade tip vortices with a ground plane. J Am Helicopter Soc2010; 55: 22005.
13.
MilluzzoJSydneyARaulederJ, et al. In ground effect aerodynamics of rotors with different blade tips. In: American Helicopter Society 66th Annual Forum Proceedings, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 11–13 May 2010.
14.
JardinTProthinSMagañaCG.Aerodynamic performance of a hovering microrotor in confined environment. J Am Helicopter Soc2017; 62: 1–7.
15.
RossowVJ.Thrust changes induced by ground and ceiling planes on a rotor in hover. J Am Helicopter Soc1985; 30: 53–55.
16.
LakshminarayanVKKalraTSBaederJD.Detailed computational investigation of a hovering microscale rotor in ground effect. AIAA J2013; 51: 893–909.
17.
KalraTSLakshminarayanVKBaederJD. CFD validation of micro hovering rotor in ground effect. In: 66th annual forum and technology display of the American Helicopter Society International, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 11–13 May 2010, pp. 1–22. Fairfax: American Helicopter Society.
18.
KalraTLakshminarayanVKBaederJ. Effect of tip geometry on a hovering rotor in ground effect: a computational study. In: 31st AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 24–27 June 2013.
19.
KalraTS. CFD modeling and analysis of rotor wake in hover interacting with a ground plane. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, 2014.
20.
GourdainNSinghDJardinT, et al. Analysis of the turbulent wake generated by a micro air vehicle hovering near the ground with a lattice Boltzmann method. J Am Helicopter Soc2017; 62: 1–12.
21.
GriffithsDAAnanthanSLeishmanJG.Predictions of rotor performance in ground effect using a Free-Vortex wake model. J Am Helicopter Soc2005; 50: 302–314.
22.
Glucksman-GlaserM. The effects of model scaling on sediment transport in brownout. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, 2013.
23.
Glucksman-GlaserMJonesA. Effects of model scaling on sediment transport in brownout. In: 30th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference. New Orleans, LA, 25–28 June 2012.
24.
SydneyALeishmanJG.Time-resolved measurements of rotor-induced particle flows produced by a hovering rotor. J Am Helicopter Soc2014; 59: 1–16.
25.
HosseiniZRamirez-SerranoAMartinuzziRJ.Ground/wall effects on a tilting ducted fan. Int J Micro Air Veh2011; 3: 119–141.
26.
KonuşMFSavaşÖ.Rotor vortex wake in close proximity of walls in hover. J Am Helicopter Soc2016; 61: 1–12.
27.
HanHChangleXBinX, et al. Experimental and computational analysis of microscale shrouded coaxial rotor in hover. In: International conference on unmanned aircraft systems, Miami, FL, USA, 13–16 June 2017, pp. 1092–1100. New York: IEEE.
28.
HuoCBarènesRGressierJ.Experimental and numerical analysis of a shrouded contrarotating coaxial rotor in hover. J Am Helicopter Soc2015; 60: 1–12.
29.
PereiraJL. Hover and wind-tunnel testing of shrouded rotors for improved micro air vehicle design. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, 2008.
30.
ThipyopasCBarènesRMoschettaJ-M. Aerodynamic analysis of a multi-mission short-shrouded coaxial UAV: part I-hovering flight. In: 26th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 18 August 2008.
31.
Wilcox DavidC.Turbulence modeling for CFD. La Canada: DCW Industries, 1993.
32.
Ansys Help. Fluent theory guide. Canonsburg: Ansys Inc., 2018.
33.
RoachePJ.Verification and validation in computational science and engineering. Albuquerque: Hermosa Publishers, 1998.
