Adaptive mesh refinement for elastic modulus reconstruction in elastography

Abstract

Meshes play a crucial role in determining the accuracy of the elastic modulus reconstruction in the elastography when the finite element method is employed. In this article, we propose an adaptive mesh refinement strategy which can ensure the coincidence of the meshes with the shape of the inclusions in the observed tissue. This strategy is based on the intensity distribution of the strain image where the variance of the strain distribution in each element of the meshes is used to measure the homogeneity of the element, that is, the larger the strain variance is the more inhomogeneous the element will be and hence more detailed information will be included in this element. For more accurate reconstruction of such detailed information, mesh refinement procedure is implemented in such elements. Besides, two refinement steps are employed for the reconstruction to improve the fitness of the reconstructed image and the observed tissue. Simulation results show that the two-stage adaptive mesh refinement algorithm performs well without needing any prior information about the internal geometric shape in tissue. Not only Young’s moduli of models but also shapes of the inclusions can be reconstructed perfectly and quickly with our proposed method.

Keywords

Elastography elastic modulus reconstruction adaptive mesh refinement finite element method Young’s modulus Poisson’s ratio

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Zhi

Luo

et al . Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions. J Ultras Med 2007; 26(6): 807–815.

Barr

. Real-time elasticity of the breast: initial clinical results. Ultrasound Q 2010; 26(2): 61–66.

Kolokythas

Gauthier

Fernanadez

et al . Ultrasound-based elastography: a novel approach to assess radio frequency ablation of liver masses performed with expandable ablation probes. J Ultras Med 2008; 27(6): 935–946.

Ophir

Cespedes

Garra

et al . Elastography: ultrasonic imaging of tissue strain and elastic modulus in vivo. Eur J Ultrasound 1996; 31: 49–70.

Friedrich-Rust

Ong

Herrmann

et al . Real-time elastography for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188(3): 758–764.

Hirokazu

Naofumi

Yuichiro

et al . Evaluation of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for fibrosis staging of chronic liver disease: a pilot study. Liver Int 2010; 30(4): 538–545.

Zhu

Chen

et al . Prostate cancer detection with real-time elastography using a bi-plane transducer: comparison with step section radical prostatectomy pathology. World J Urol 2014; 32(2): 329–333.

Luo

Kim

Dighe

et al . Thyroid nodule classification using ultrasound elastography via linear discriminant analysis. Ultrasonics 2011; 51(4): 425–431.

Ophir

Cespedes

Ponnekanti

et al . Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrasonic Imaging 1991; 13: 111–134.

10.

Cespedes

Ophir

Ponnekanti

et al . Elastography: elasticity imaging using ultrasound with application to muscle and breast in vivo. Ultrasonic Imaging 1993; 15: 73–88.

11.

Doyley

Meaney

Bamber

. Evaluation of an iterative reconstruction method for quantitative elastography. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45: 1521–1540.

12.

Kallel

Bertrand

. Tissue elasticity reconstruction using linear perturbation method. IEEE T Med Imaging 1996; 15(3): 299–313.

13.

Doyley

. Model-based elastography: a survey of approaches to the inverse elasticity problem. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57(3): 35–73.

14.

Arnold

Reichling

Bruhns

et al . Efficient computation of the elastography inverse problem by combining variational mesh adaption and a clustering technique. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55(7): 2035–2056.

15.

Goksel

Salcudean

. Image-based variational meshing. IEEE T Med Imaging 2011; 30(1): 11–21.

16.

Goksel

Eskandari

Salcudean

. Mesh adaptation for improving elasticity reconstruction using the FEM inverse problem. IEEE T Med Imaging 2013; 32(2): 408–418.

17.

Srinivasan

Ophir

. A zero-crossing strain estimator for elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29(2): 227–238.

18.

Xiao

Shen

Niu

et al . Strain estimation in elastography using scale-invariant keypoints tracking. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectrics Freq Contr 2013; 60(4): 706–716.

19.

Lindop

Treece

Gee

et al . Estimation of displacement location for enhanced strain imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectrics Freq Contr 2007; 54(9): 1751–1771.

20.

Lindop

Treece

Gee

. Phase-based ultrasonic deformation estimation. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr 2008; 55(1): 94–111.

21.

Wang

et al . Strain estimation by a Fourier series-based extrema tracking algorithm for elastography. Ultrasonics 2015; 62: 278–291.

22.

Buijs

Hansen

HHG

Lopata

RGP

et al . Predicting target displacements using ultrasound elastography and finite element modeling. IEEE T Bio-Med Eng 2011; 58(11): 3143–3155.

23.

Freitag

. On combining Laplacian and optimization-based mesh smoothing techniques. In: Canann

Saigal

(eds) Trends in unstructured mesh generation. New York: ASME, 1997, pp.37–43.

24.

Gefen

Dilmoney

. Mechanics of the normal woman’s breast. Technol Health Care 2007; 15(4): 259–271.

25.

Aghajani

Haghpanahi

Nikazad

. The ultrasound elastography inverse problem and the effective criteria. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2013; 227(11): 1203–1212.

26.

Ophir

Alam

Garra

et al . Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1999; 213: 203–233.

27.

Grenier

Gennisson

Cornelis

et al . Renal ultrasound elastography. Diagn Interv Imag 2013; 94(5): 545–550.