An adaptive socket with auto-adjusting air bladders for interfacing transhumeral prosthesis: A pilot study

Abstract

Comfort is a critical aspect in the application of wearable device, such as rehabilitation robots and upper limb prostheses. As a physical interface between human body and prosthetic limb, the socket and its comfort largely contribute to the user’s acceptance. Traditional sockets are static, lacking dynamic adjustment mechanism for the contact pressure. To ensure a reliable suspension during daily activities, the socket is usually designed to be tightly attached, with a large stress, on the residual limb, which may introduce considerable discomfort during long-term use. In this article, we present a novel adaptive transhumeral socket, in which we employ four independent bladders contacting with the stump. Not only can these bladders provide a necessary suspension for the device but also form an air cushion (soft body) that helps relieve the pressure concentration between the biological body and physical prosthesis. In real time, this adaptive socket continuously monitors the limb posture, the operating load, and the contacting pressure between the socket and the limb, and then dynamically adjusts the clamping force to ensure a reliable attachment during various daily activities. Since well adapting to the contours of the stump, the bladders can effectively accommodate the volume change of the stump, making a balanced load distribution on load-tolerant areas. Through modeling and numerical analysis, we established a dynamic strategy for estimating the external load and an automatic scheme for adjusting the bladders’ air pressure. Finally, a close-loop control was constructed based on the contact pressure measured by our self-developed force sensors. Our preliminary experiments on one normal (i.e. non-amputee) subject verified the effectiveness of the proposed method, showing that the adaptive socket can considerably reduce the socket–limb contact pressure while sustaining a secure suspension on the upper arm.

Keywords

Transhumeral socket upper arm prostheses prosthetic interface rehabilitation comfort suspension

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Plettenburg

. Basic requirements for upper extremity prostheses: the WILMER approach. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, Hong Kong, China, 1 November 1998, pp.2276–2281. New York: IEEE.

Schultz

Baade

Kuiken

. Expert opinions on success factors for upper-limb prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007; 44: 483–490.

Biddiss

Chau

. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007; 31: 236–257.

Biddiss

Chau

. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 86: 977–987.

Vujaklija

Farina

Aszmann

. New developments in prosthetic arm systems. Orthop Res Rev 2016; 8: 31–39.

Broomfield

Dykes

. Experience with custom silicone suspension sleeves for self suspending trans-humeral and trans-radial prostheses. In: Proceedings of the 1999 MyoElectric controls/powered prosthetics symposium Fredericton, Fredericton, NB, Canada, August 1999, https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/4910

Daly

Voo

Rosenbaum-Chou

et al . Socket pressure and discomfort in upper-limb prostheses: a preliminary study. J Prosthet Orthot 2014; 26: 99–106.

Lovely

. Signals and signal processing for myoelectric control. In: Muzumdar

(ed.) Powered upper limb prostheses: control, implementation and clinical application. 1st ed. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Springer, 2004, pp.35–54.

Pan

Zhang

Jiang

et al . Improving robustness against electrode shift of high density EMG for myoelectric control through common spatial patterns. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2015; 12: 110–125.

10.

Alley

Williams

III Albuquerque

et al . Prosthetic sockets stabilized by alternating areas of tissue compression and release. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011; 48: 679–696.

11.

Resnik

Patel

Cooney

et al . Comparison of trans-humeral socket designs utilizing patient assessment and in vivo skeletal and socket motion tracking: a case study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2016; 11: 423–432.

12.

Sang

Luo

. Characteristics of a volume-adjustable compression chamber for transradial prosthetic interface. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2016; 230: 650–660.

13.

Sang

Gan

et al . A novel socket design for upper-limb prosthesis. Int J Appl Electrom 2014; 45: 881–886.

14.

Razak

NAA

Osman

NAA

Gholizadeh

et al . Prosthetics socket that incorporates an air splint system focusing on dynamic interface pressure. Biomed Eng Online 2014; 13: 108–120.

15.

Razak

Osman

Ali

et al . Comparison study of the prosthetics interface pressure profile of air splint socket and ICRC polypropylene socket for upper limb prosthetics. Biocybern Biomed Eng 2015; 35: 100–105.

16.

Abd Razak

Gholizadeh

Hasnan

et al . An anthropomorphic transhumeral prosthesis socket developed based on an oscillometric pump and controlled by force-sensitive resistor pressure signals. Biomed Tech 2017; 62: 49–55.

17.

Candrea

Sharma

Osborn

et al . An adaptable prosthetic socket: regulating independent air bladders through closed-loop control. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS), Baltimore, MD, 28–31 May 2017, pp.1–4. New York: IEEE.

18.

Lee

Cabibihan

Thakor

. Bio-mimetic strategies for tactile sensing. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE sensors, Baltimore, MD, 3–6 November 2013, pp.1–4. New York: IEEE.

19.

Osborn

Kaliki

Soares

et al . Neuromimetic event-based detection for closed-loop tactile feedback control of upper limb prostheses. IEEE T Haptics 2016; 9: 196–206.

20.

Osborn

Dragomir

Betthauser

et al . Prosthesis with neuromorphic multilayered e-dermis perceives touch and pain. Sci Robot 2018; 3. DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aat3818.

21.

McLaurin

Sauter

Dolan

et al . Fabrication procedures for the open-shoulder above-elbow socket. Artif Limbs 1969; 13: 46–54.

22.

Andrew

. Elbow disarticulation and trans-humeral amputation: prosthetic principles. In: Bowker

Michael

(eds) Atlas of limb prosthetics: surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1992, pp.255–264.

23.

Andrew

. Transhumeral and elbow disarticulation anatomically contoured socket considerations. J Prosthet Orthot 2008; 20: 107–117.

24.

Young

Hargrove

Kuiken

. Improving myoelectric pattern recognition robustness to electrode shift by changing interelectrode distance and electrode configuration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012; 59: 645–652.