The infrapatellar fat pad is an adipose tissue in the knee that facilitates the distribution of synovial fluid and absorbs impulsive actions generated through the joint. The correlation between morphological configuration and mechanical properties is analyzed by a computational approach. The microscopic anatomy of the infrapatellar fat pad is studied aiming to measure the dimension of adipose lobules and the thickness of connective septa. Results from histomorphometric investigations show that the infrapatellar fat pad is an inhomogeneous tissue, constituted by large lobules in the superficial part and smaller lobules in the deepest one. Finite element models of the infrapatellar fat pad are developed. The first model considers the inhomogeneous conformation of the infrapatellar fat pad, composed of micro- and macro-chambers, while the second model considers a homogeneous distribution of adipose lobules with similar dimensions. Computational analyses are performed considering the static standing configuration and the passive flexion–extension movement. The computational results allow us to identify the different stress and strain fields within the tissue and to appreciate the variation of the mechanical performance of the overall system considering the distribution of adipose lobules. Results show that the distribution of adipose lobules in macro- and micro-chambers allows major deformation of the infrapatellar fat pad, decreasing the stress inside the tissues.
GallagherJTierneyPMurrayP, et al. The infrapatellar fat pad: anatomy and clinical correlations. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc2005; 13(4): 268–272.
2.
MacchiVPorzionatoASarasinG, et al. The infrapatellar adipose body: a histotopographic study. Cells Tissues Organs2016; 201(3): 220–231.
3.
MacchiVStoccoESteccoC, et al. The infrapatellar fat pad and the synovial membrane: an anatomo-functional unit. J Anat2018; 233(2): 146–154.
4.
FaveroMEl-HadiHBelluzziE, et al. Infrapatellar fat pad features in osteoarthritis: a histopathological and molecular study. Rheumatol2017; 56(10): 1784–1793.
5.
FontanellaCGBelluzziERossatoM, et al. Quantitative MRI analysis of infrapatellar and suprapatellar fat pads in normal controls, moderate and end-stage osteoarthritis. Ann Anat—Anat Anzeiger2019; 221: 108–114.
6.
FontanellaCGMacchiVCarnielEL, et al. Biomechanical behavior of Hoffa’s fat pad in healthy and osteoarthritic conditions: histological and mechanical investigations. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med2018; 41(3): 657–667.
7.
BohnsackMHurschlerCDemirtasT, et al. Infrapatellar fat pad pressure and volume changes of the anterior compartment during knee motion: possible clinical consequences to the anterior knee pain syndrome. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc2005; 13(2): 135–141.
8.
HamarnehG. Deformation analysis of Hoffa’s fat pad from CT images of knee flexion and extension. In: Proceedings SPIE 5746, medical imaging 2005: physiology, function, and structure from medical images, San Diego, CA, 12–17 February. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
9.
StephenJMSopherRTullieS, et al. The infrapatellar fat pad is a dynamic and mobile structure, which deforms during knee motion, and has proximal extensions which wrap around the patella. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc2018; 26: 3515–3524.
10.
ClockaertsSBastiaansen-JenniskensYMRunhaarJ, et al. The infrapatellar fat pad should be considered as an active osteoarthritic joint tissue: a narrative review. Osteoarth Cartil2010; 18: 876–882.
11.
DragooJLJohnsonCMcConnellJ. Evaluation and treatment of disorders of the infrapatellar fat pad. Sport Med2012; 42(1): 51–67.
12.
DuriZAAAichrothPMDowdG, et al. The fat pad and its relationship to anterior knee pain. Knee1997; 4(4): 227–236.
13.
Ioan-FacsinayAKloppenburgM. An emerging player in knee osteoarthritis: the infrapatellar fat pad. Arthritis Res Ther2013; 15: 225.
14.
YeCZhangWWuW, et al. Influence of the infrapatellar fat pad resection during total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE2016; 11(10): e0163515.
15.
FontanellaCGCarnielELFrigoA, et al. Investigation of biomechanical response of Hoffa’s fat pad and comparative characterization. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2017; 67: 1–9.
16.
MacchiVPicardiEEEFontanellaCG, et al. The characteristics of the lobular arrangement indicate the dynamic role played by the infrapatellar fat pad in knee kinematics. J Anat2019; 235: 88–87.
17.
BuschmannWRJahssMHKummerF, et al. Histology and histomorphometric analysis of the normal and atrophic heel fat pad. Foot Ankle Int1995; 16: 254–258.
18.
HsuC-CTsaiW-CWangC-L, et al. Microchambers and macrochambers in heel pads: are they functionally different?J Appl Physiol2007; 102(6): 2227–2231.
19.
JahssMHMichelsonJDDesalP, et al. Investigation into the fat pads of the sole of the foot: anatomy and histology. Foot Ankle Int1992; 13: 227–232.
20.
Vera-PérezESánchez-BringasGVentura-RíosL, et al. Sonographic characterization of Hoffa’s fat pad. A pilot study. Rheumatol Int2017; 37(5): 757–764.
21.
NataliANFontanellaCGCarnielEL. A numerical model for investigating the mechanics of calcaneal fat pad region. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2012; 5(1): 216–223.
22.
YushkevichPAPivenJHazlettHC, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage2006; 31(3): 1116–1128.
23.
JacobsonJALenchikLRuhoyMK, et al. MR imaging of the infrapatellar fat pad of Hoffa. RadioGraphics1997; 17(3): 675–691.
24.
WangYFanYZhangM. Comparison of stress on knee cartilage during kneeling and standing using finite element models. Med Eng Phys2014; 36(4): 439–447.
25.
OrozcoGATanskaPMononenME, et al. The effect of constitutive representations and structural constituents of ligaments on knee joint mechanics. Sci Rep2018; 8: 2323.
26.
GoskeSErdermirAPetreM, et al. Reduction of plantar heel pressure: insole design using finite element analysis. J Biomech2006; 39: 2363–2370.
27.
FontanellaCGNalessoFCarnielEL, et al. Biomechanical behavior of plantar fat pad in healthy and degenerative foot conditions. Med Biol Eng Comput2016; 54(4): 653–661.
28.
FontanellaCGForestieroACarnielEL, et al. Investigation of the mechanical behaviour of the plantar soft tissue during gait cycle: experimental and numerical activities. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2015; 229(10): 713–720.
29.
DaněkJNedomaJHlaváčekI, et al. Numerical modelling of the weight-bearing total knee joint replacement and usage in practice. Math Comput Simul2007; 76(1–3): 49–56.
30.
GuoYZhangXChenW. Three-dimensional finite element simulation of total knee joint in gait cycle. Acta Mech Solida Sin2009; 22(4): 347–351.
31.
InnocentiBBilgenÖFLabeyL, et al. Load sharing and ligament strains in balanced, overstuffed and understuffed UKA. A validated finite element analysis. J Arthroplasty2014; 29(7): 1491–1498.
32.
PapaioannouGDemetropoulosCKKingYH. Predicting the effects of knee focal articular surface injury with a patient-specific finite element model. Knee2010; 17(1): 61–68.
33.
van JonbergenHPWInnocentiBGervasiGL, et al. Differences in the stress distribution in the distal femur between patellofemoral joint replacement and total knee replacement: a finite element study. J Orthop Surg Res2012; 7(1): 1.
34.
FengYTsaiTLiJ, et al. Motion of the femoral condyles in flexion and extension during a continuous lunge. J Orthopaed Res2015; 33: 591–597.
35.
IwakiHPinskerovaVFreemanMAR. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shape and relative movements of the femure and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg2000; 82-B: 1189–1195.
