This study explores the combined effects of backpack loading and smartphone dual tasking on gait dynamic stability. Unlike previous separate investigations, it systematically examines their individual and interactive influences on postural stability. An experimental protocol simulated smartphone use during backpack-loaded walking. Kinematic and kinetic data from 15 female university students were collected via 3D motion capture and analyzed using inverse dynamics. An innovative computational method assessed margin of stability (MOS), investigating biomechanical mechanisms of postural instability. Smartphone tasks disrupt pelvic, lumbar, and lower limb kinetics/kinematics, reducing walking speed and increasing instability risk. Backpack loading altered knee range of motion and ankle/metatarsophalangeal moments, with 15% body weight (BW) loads showing significant destabilizing effects. Instability correlated strongly with hip, lumbar, and metatarsophalangeal parameters. Combined tasks exacerbated effects, including reduced gait velocity and the kinematic parameters and degrees of freedom variations. Both backpack loading and mobile phone dual tasking significantly altered movement characteristics, force exertion patterns, and gait stability during walking in the pelvis, hip joints, and lumbar spine, with demonstrable interaction effects between these factors. Across the pelvis, hip joints, lumbar spine, and lower extremity joints, adaptations in joint range of motion and peak moments generated distinct mechanical adjustments to compensate for attentional distraction and center-of-mass deviation induced by these combined variables.
SajewiczJDziuba-SłoninaA. Texting on a smartphone while walking affects gait parameters. Int J Environ Res Public Health2023; 20: 4590. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054590
2.
Dijk-HuismanHCVSendenRSmeetsMHH, et al. The effect of a smartphone app with an accelerometer on the physical activity behavior of hospitalized patients: a randomized controlled trial. Sens2023; 23: 8704. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218704
3.
LimJChangSHLeeJ, et al. Effects of smartphone texting on the visual perception and dynamic walking stability. J Exerc Rehabil2017; 13: 48–54. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.1732920.460
4.
KimSCChoWSChoSH. Effects of smart phone use on lower limb joint angle and dynamic balance during gait. Work2020; 65: 31–37. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-193055
5.
PalumboNGeorgeBJohnsonA, et al. The effects of backpack load carrying on dynamic balance as measured by limits of stability. Work2001; 16: 123–129.
6.
LimJAmadoASheehanL, et al. Dual task interference during walking: the effects of texting on situational awareness and gait stability. Gait Posture2015; 42: 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.07.060
7.
BruyneelAVReinmannAGafnerSC, et al. Does texting while walking affect spatiotemporal gait parameters in healthy adults, older people, and persons with motor or cognitive disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture2023; 100: 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.01.009
8.
MartinJPLiQ. 16 load carriage device for studying medial-lateral stability of walking: design and performance evaluation. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics: 2019, 2019. pp. 1179–1184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/icorr.2019.8779385.
9.
LiewBMorrisSNettoK. The effect of backpack carriage on the biomechanics of walking: a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis. J Appl Biomech2016; 32: 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2015-0339
LeeSShimJ. The effects of backpack loads and spinal stabilization exercises on the dynamic foot pressure of elementary school children with idiopathic scoliosis. J Phys Ther Sci2015; 27: 2257–2260. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2257
12.
SuriCShojaeiIBazrgariB. Effects of school backpacks on spine biomechanics during daily activities: a narrative review of literature. Hum Factors2020; 62: 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819858792
13.
SharpeSRHoltKGSaltzmanE, et al. Effects of a hip belt on transverse plane trunk coordination and stability during load carriage. J Biomech2008; 41: 968–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.12.018
14.
KiefferEEBrolinsonPGRowsonS. Dual-task gait performance following head impact exposure in male and female collegiate rugby players. Int J Sports Phys Therapy2022; 17: 355–365. https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.32591
15.
BorhaniMMcGregorAHBullAMJ. An alternative technical marker set for the pelvis is more repeatable than the standard pelvic marker set. Gait Posture2013; 38: 1032–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.019
16.
MaroneJRPatelPBHurtCP, et al. Frontal plane margin of stability is increased during texting while walking. Gait Posture2014; 40: 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.188
17.
GaoLGusztávFGaoZ. Effects of loading positions on lower limb biomechanics during lunge squat in men with different training experience. Phys Act Heal2025; 9: 198–213. https://doi.org/10.5334/paah.489
18.
GaoSSongYSunD, et al. Impact of Becker muscular dystrophy on gait patterns: insights from biomechanical analysis. Gait Posture2025; 121: 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.05.008
19.
Di PietroABersaniACurreliC, et al. AST: an OpenSim-based tool for the automatic scaling of generic musculoskeletal models. Comput Biol Med2024; 175: 108524.
20.
FerraroFVGavinJPWainwrightT, et al. The effects of 8 weeks of inspiratory muscle training on the balance of healthy older adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Physiol Rep2019; 7: e14076. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14076
21.
Daryabeygi-KhotbehsaraRShariful IslamSMDunstanD, et al. Smartphone-based interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and promote physical activity using integrated dynamic models: systematic review. J Med Internet Res2021; 23: e26315. https://doi.org/10.2196/26315
22.
Castillo de LimaVCastañoLAASampaioRAC, et al. Effect of agility ladder training with a cognitive task (dual task) on physical and cognitive functions: a randomized study. Front Public Health2023; 11: 1159343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1159343
23.
MarquesACFRossiFENevesLM, et al. Combined aerobic and strength training improves dynamic stability and can prevent against static stability decline in postmenopausal women: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet2023; 45: e465–e473. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772178
24.
TramontanoMArgentoOOrejel BustosAS, et al. Cognitive-motor dual-task training improves dynamic stability during straight and curved gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2024; 60: 27–36. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08156-X
25.
JacobsonBHCaldwellBKullingFA. Comparison of hiking stick use on lateral stability while balancing with and without a load. Percept Mot Skills1997; 85: 347–350. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.85.1.347
26.
HowellDRStraccioliniAGeminianiE, et al. Dual-task gait differences in female and male adolescents following sport-related concussion. Gait Posture2017; 54: 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.034
BlackerSDWilliamsNCFallowfieldJL, et al. The effect of a carbohydrate beverage on the physiological responses during prolonged load carriage. Eur J Appl Physiol2011; 111: 1901–1908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1822-y
StrongmanCCavallerioFTimmisMA, et al. A scoping review of the validity and reliability of smartphone accelerometers when collecting kinematic gait data. Sens2023; 23: 8615. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23208615
33.
MuslimKNussbaumMA. Traditional posterior load carriage: effects of load mass and size on torso kinematics, kinetics, muscle activity and movement stability. Ergonomics2016; 59: 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1053538
34.
WangYWolford-ClevengerCMrugS, et al. Impact of smartphone distraction and alcohol intoxication on pedestrian risk-taking. J Saf Res2025; 92: 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2025.01.002
35.
ShymonSHargensARMinkoffLA, et al. Body posture and backpack loading: an upright magnetic resonance imaging study of the adult lumbar spine. Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc2014; 23: 1407–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3247-5
36.
DaffinLInnesSStuelckenM. Changing the horizontal position of a fixed backpack load: the effect on postural stability in young adults. Work2023; 76: 1099–1104. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-230044
WalshGSLowDCArkesteijnM. Effect of stable and unstable load carriage on walking gait variability, dynamic stability and muscle activity of older adults. J Biomech2018; 73: 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.03.018
39.
GhaiSGhaiIEffenbergAO, et al. Effects of dual tasks and dual-task training on postural stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging2017; 12: 557–577. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S125201
40.
SongYCenXWangM, et al. A systematic review of finite element analysis in running footwear biomechanics: Insights for running-related musculoskeletal injuries. J Sports Sci Med2025; 24: 370–387. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.370
41.
ChangHCenX. Can running technique modification benefit patellofemoral pain improvement in runners: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Biomed Eng Technol2024; 45: 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBET.2024.138706
42.
WangDSongYSunD, et al. Biomechanical trade-offs in knee brace stiffness: dynamic stability during single-leg lateral landings in young males. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2026; 34: 626–637. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2026.3653016
