Abstract
We report a case of management failure of male urethritis syndrome due to macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium in South Africa. We detected mutations in 23S rRNA and one of the quinolone resistance-determining regions. This report confirms that drug-resistant M. genitalium infection can undermine the effectiveness of syndromic management in Africa.
Keywords
Introduction
In South Africa, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are managed syndromically through algorithms based on the patient’s presenting symptoms. Male urethritis syndrome (MUS) is a common clinical presentation at primary healthcare facilities in South Africa; it is usually caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis or Mycoplasma genitalium infection. 1 M. genitalium infection is treated by azithromycin in the syndromic regimen. However, there have been reports of widespread treatment failure of azithromycin for male urethral infection from across the globe, but not yet from the African continent where syndromic management regimen is used. 2 We present a case of syndromic treatment failure due to drug-resistant urethral M. genitalium infection and discuss the implications of this for the management of STIs in resource-constrainted settings.
Case report
A 25-year-old HIV-negative man presented at a community health centre (CHC) in Soweto, South Africa, with symptoms suggestive of MUS. He complained of dysuria and penile discharge for the last 14 days. The patient reported one stable female sexual partner. He was treated syndromically for MUS with 250 mg ceftriaxone intramuscular injection and 1 g azithromycin as per the current South African STI management guidelines. 3 In addition, a partner notification slip was issued to allow him to notify his sexual partner.
Four weeks later, the patient returned to the same CHC complaining of persistent dysuria and penile discharge. The symptoms remained unchanged following initial syndromic treatment and he was unwilling to disclose and notify his sexual partner. Discharge was confirmed during examination; no other abnormalities were identified. The patient was enrolled in a study addressing the aetiology of persistent symptomatic STIs in men in Johannesburg. After informed consent was obtained, a sample of urethral discharge and first-void urine (FVU) were obtained for further investigation. In line with the South African STI management guidelines, the patient was treated with an increased dosage of 1 g of ceftriaxone combined with a single dose azithromycin 2 g.
The urethral discharge swab was plated on New York City agar for culture of N. gonorrhoeae; no growth was observed after 48 h. FVU was used for molecular detection of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and T. vaginalis using the PrestoPlus CT-NG-TV assay (Microbiome Ltd, Houten, The Netherlands); 4 all reactions were negative. M. genitalium infection, however, was detected from the urine sample using a validated in-house M. genitalium PCR assay. 5 M. genitalium DNA was tested for macrolide drug resistance-associated mutations in the 23S rRNA gene using real-time PCR coupled with melting curve analysis. 6 Melting curve analysis of the DNA showed a peak (63.7°C) differing from the wild type strain (68.3°C). Sequence analysis of the 23S rRNA gene confirmed a mutation at position A2071G, associated with macrolide resistance (Table 1).6,7 A quinolone resistance-associated mutation was detected by sequencing of quinolone-resistance determining regions of the parC and gyrA genes. 8 The patient was contacted by telephone to discuss his results and was advised to return to the clinic for retreatment. Unfortunately, the patient did not return for further treatment and could no longer be reached by phone.
Mutations associated with macrolide and quinolone resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium infection in a patient failing management of male urethritis syndrome in South Africa.
Nucleotide positions according to M. genitalium numbering according to G37 reference genome (NC_000908).
Numbering of amino acids according to M. genitalium gene sequences.
Discussion
We present a case of failure of syndromic management of male urethritis due to macrolide-resistant M. genitalium infection in South Africa. In addition, a mutation associated with quinolone resistance was identified that has been reported from various countries across the globe. 7 To our knowledge, a case of male urethritis caused by multi-drug-resistant M. genitalium infection has not been reported from the African continent before. In the absence of routine diagnostics, resistance data of M. genitalium in Africa are scarce and limited to small series of asymptomatic infections in women.9,10
The case that we report highlights a potential limitation of syndromic management in the context of macrolide-resistant M. genitalium infection. As per guidelines, our patient was treated twice with azithromycin and ceftriaxone, but without success. Moxifloxacin is not included in the current algorithm nor is it routinely available in public care in South Africa, although its effectiveness in this case is uncertain. Diagnostics are not routinely available in the public healthcare system in South Africa and, if done, usually only focus on the cultivation of N. gonorrhoeae. As such, it is highly unlikely that our patient would have received adequate antimicrobial treatment.
The widespread use of azithromycin in the syndromic management of STIs has significantly enhanced the spread of macrolide-resistant M. genitalium infections. 11 As debated by others, and confirmed by us through this case report, drug-resistant M. genitalium infection has the potential to undermine the effectiveness of syndromic management of STIs.11,12 Epidemiological data on the prevalence and distribution of macrolide-resistance in the African context are urgently warranted to inform syndromic management guidelines. Important considerations in that regard are the implementation of aetiological testing that should include M. genitalium and potential drug resistance as well as the establishment of a strengthened second-line algorithm for those that fail initial syndromic management.
Footnotes
Acknowledgement
We thank the staff at the Health4Men clinics in Johannesburg for their contribution, efforts and support.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Research Ethics committee, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria (Ref 253/2017).
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
