In three experiments, we tested whether people can protect their ongoing goal pursuits from antagonistic priming effects by using if-then plans (i.e., implementation intentions). In Experiment 1, concept priming did not influence lexical decision time for a critical stimulus when participants had formed if-then plans to make fast responses to that stimulus. In Experiment 2, participants who were primed with a prosocial goal allowed a confederate who asked for help to interrupt their work on a focal task for a longer time if they had merely formed goal intentions to perform well than if they had also formed implementation intentions for concentrating on the task. In Experiment 3, priming the goal of being fast increased driving speed and errors for participants who had formed mere goal intentions to drive only as fast as safety allowed or who had formed no goal intentions, whereas the driving of participants who had formed such goal intentions as well as implementation intentions showed no such priming effects. Our findings indicate that implementation intentions are an effective self-regulatory tool for shielding actions from disruptive concept- or goal-priming effects.
AartsH.DijksterhuisA. (2002). Category activation effects in judgment and behaviour: The moderating role of perceived comparability. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 123–138.
2.
BarghJ. A. (1990). Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 93–130). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
BarghJ. A. (1997). Reply to the commentaries. In WyerR. S. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition: Vol. X. The automaticity of everyday life (pp. 231–246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
BarghJ. A.ChenM.BurrowsL. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype priming on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.
5.
BarghJ. A.FergusonM. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925–945.
6.
BarghJ. A.GollwitzerP. M.Lee-ChaiA.BarndollarK.TrötschelR. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027.
7.
BayerU. C.AchtzigerA.GollwitzerP. M.MoskowitzG. B. (2009). Responding to subliminal cues: Do if-then plans facilitate action preparation and initiation without conscious intent?Social Cognition, 27, 183–201.
8.
BayerU. C.GollwitzerP. M.AchtzigerA. (2010). Staying on track: Planned goal striving is protected from disruptive inner states. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 505–514.
9.
BrandstätterV.LengfelderA.GollwitzerP. M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 946–960.
10.
BryC.FollenfantA.MeyerT. (2008). Blond like me: When self-construals moderate stereotype priming effects on intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 751–757.
11.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464–478.
12.
CroizetJ. C.FiskeS. T. (2000). Moderation of priming by goals: Feeling entitled to judge increases judged usability of evaluative primes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 155–181.
13.
DeMarreeK. G.WheelerS. C. (2005). Priming a new identity: Self-monitoring moderates the effects of nonself primes on self-judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 657–671.
14.
DijksterhuisA.AartsH. (2010). Goals, attention, and (un)consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 467–490.
15.
DijksterhuisA.AartsH.BarghJ. A.van KnippenbergA. (2000). On the relation between associative strength and automatic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 531–544.
16.
DijksterhuisA.BarghJ. A. (2001). The perception–behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 1–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
DijksterhuisA.SpearsR.PostmesT.StapelD. A.KoomenW.van KnippenbergA.ScheepersD. (1998). Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 862–871.
18.
DükerH. (1949). Über ein Verfahren zur Untersuchung der psychischen Leistungsfähigkeit. Psychologische Forschung, 23, 10–24.
19.
FörsterJ.LibermanN.FriedmanR. S. (2009). What do we prime? On distinguishing between semantic priming, procedural priming, and goal priming. In MorsellaE.BarghJ. A.GollwitzerP. M. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of human action (pp. 173–196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
GilbertS. J.GollwitzerP. M.CohenA.-L.OettingenG.BurgessP. W. (2009). Separable brain systems supporting cues versus self-initiated realization of delayed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 905–915.
21.
GollwitzerP. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 141–185.
22.
GollwitzerP. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
23.
GollwitzerP. M.SheeranP. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 69–120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
HommelB.MüsselerJ.AscherslebenG.PrinzW. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.
25.
LewinK. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
26.
MacraeC. N.JohnsonL. (1998). Help, I need somebody: Automatic action and inaction. Social Cognition, 16, 400–417.
OettingenG.GollwitzerP. M. (2001). Goal setting and goal striving. In TesserA.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (pp. 329–347). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
29.
OettingenG.GrantH.SmithP. K.SkinnerM.GollwitzerP. M. (2006). Nonconscious goal pursuit: Acting in an explanatory vacuum. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 668–675.
30.
Parks-StammE. J.GollwitzerP. M.OettingenG. (2007). Action control by implementation intentions: Effective cue detection and efficient response initiation. Social Cognition, 25, 248–266.
31.
SassenbergK.MoskowitzG. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 506–514.
32.
WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2004). Identifying good opportunities to act: Implementation intentions and cue discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 407–419.
33.
WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2007). How do implementation intentions promote goal attainment? A test of component processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 295–302.
34.
WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2008). Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: The role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 373–395.
35.
WilsonT. D.BrekkeN. (1984). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117–142.
