Improved method to mitigate the effect of coal fuel switching on critical process parameters of a steam generator in a thermal power plant

Abstract

The design and performance of steam generators supplied to thermal power plants are greatly influenced by the properties of coal burnt. All coals are not same and the variation of heating value of coal supplied to boiler results in changes in critical process parameters like pressure and temperature of main steam produced. These fluctuations are normally controlled by master pressure controller, provided the variation in heating value is within certain limits. If the heating value of coal being burnt varies substantially, a remedial measure is necessary to control the pressure and temperature fluctuations during coal fuel switching. The composition of the coal burnt currently in a boiler is determined from an online analyser, and an embedded controller computes the current heating value of the coal and suitably modifies the gains of all the controllers to arrest the undue fluctuations in pressure and temperature. A validated mathematical model for a typical 500 MW plant is used to simulate the variations in pressure and temperature of steam with normal and embedded controllers. Significant reduction in pressure and temperature variation has been achieved with an embedded controller. This article discusses the improved method of ensuring optimum boiler performance during coal fuel switchover.

Keywords

coal quality embedded control calorific value mathematical model boiler dynamics boiler controls fossil-fuel power plants self-tuning control fuel switching fuel flexibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mueller, M. G. Low-carbon coal: Meeting US energy, employment and CO₂ emission goals with 21st century technologies. The National Coal Council, December 2009.

Mahr, D. Coal quality control. Energy Associates, P.C., generation. Available from http://www.ifandp.com/article, 1 June 2010.

Productivity improvement for fossil steam power plants: industry case studies, EPRI technical update no. 1009239, Palo Alto, California, 2003.

Andrew Maxson, J., Sehgal, R., and Shea, S. An on-line integrated control system for reducing coal costs and coal-related emissions: coal blend automation system. In Proceedings of the Advanced Coal-Based Power and Environmental Systems ’97 Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 22–24 July 1997, pp. 1–16.

Garduno-Ramirez, R. and Lee, K. Y. Overall control of fossil-fuel power plants. In Proceedings of the Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, IEEE, vol. 3, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 28 January–1 February 2001, pp.1209–1214.

Kocaarslan

Cam

Tiryaki

A fuzzy logic controller application for thermal power plants. Energy Convers. Mgmt., 2006, 47, 442–458.

Gotoa

Nakamuraa

Matsumurab

Automatic realization of human experience for controlling variable pressure boilers. Control Engng Pract., 2002, 10, 15–22.

National Risk Management Research Laboratory. Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired electric utility boilers. Interim report, US Environmental Protection Agency, NC 27711, December 2001.

Smith, S. R. The role of on-line, real-time coal analysis in advanced process control & optimization. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint ISA POWID/EPRI, Controls & Instrumentation Conference, San Jose, California, 4–9 June 2006, pp. 1–25.

10.

Patel

S. U.

Kumar

J. B.

Badhe

Y. P.

Sharma

B. K.

Saha

Biswas

Chaudhury

Tambe

S. S.

Kulkarni

B. D.

Estimation of gross calorific value of coals using artificial neural networks. Fuel, 2007, 86, 334–344. (Elsevier).

11.

On-line analysis of heating value. Report no. TE-113817, EPRI, Palo Alto, California, 1999.

12.

Radmilović

Stojaković

Kvaščev

One solution of main controller in thermal power plants. J. Autom. Control, University of Belgrade, 2008, 18(1), 5–8.

13.

Ugursal

V. I.

Al Taweel

A. M.

Mackay

G. D. M.

Impact of coal quality on the cost of Electrical power generation: a techno-economic model. Int. J. Energy Res., 1990, 14, 683–699.

14.

Liu

Cai

W.-J.

Soh

Y.-C.

Li-Hua Xie

Anew coordinated control strategy for boiler-turbine system of coal-fired power plant. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2005, 13(6), 943–954.

15.

Lausterer

G. K.

Improved maneuverability of power plants for better grid stability. Control Engng Pract., 1998, 6, 1549–1557.

16.

Taft, C. Investigation of adaptive control techniques for improved fuel flexibility. EPRI Technical update no. 1012260, Palo Alto, California, 2007.

17.

Sivakumar, L., Dharmalingam, S., and Anil Kumar, K. K. Effect of variation in coal quality on critical process parameters of a steam generator in a thermal power plant. In Proceedings of TIMA – 2009, MIT Campus, Anna University, Chennai, India, pp. 257–263.

18.

Saptoro, A., Vuthaluru, H. B., and Tadé, M. O. A comparative study of prediction of elemental composition of coal using empirical modelling. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advanced control of chemical processes, Gramado, Brazil, 2–5 April 2006, pp. 747–752.

19.

Moodley, V. and Minnitt, R. C. A. Sampling, sample preparation and analytical practices for power station-type coals. In Proceedings of the Fourth World Conference on Sampling & blending, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg, South Africa, 21–23 October 2009, pp. 85–94.

20.

Andrés

J. M.

Bona

M. T.

ASTM clustering for improving coal analysis by near-infrared spectroscopy. Talanta, 200670(4): 711–719A collection ofpapers presented at the 1st Workshop of the European Union: Analysis and Removal of Contaminants from Wastewaters for the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive - 1st EMCO 2005.

21.

Sivakumar, L. and Bhattacharya, R. K. Dynamic analysis of a power boiler using a non linear mathematical model. In Proceedings of International Conference on Power plant dynamics and control, Hyderabad, India, 14–16 February, 1979, pp. 21–29.

22.

Ponnusamy, P., Sivakumar, L., and Sankaran, S. V. Low-order dynamic model of a complete thermal power plant loop. In Proceedings of the Power Plant Dynamics, Control and Testing Symposium, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA, 1, 1983, pp. 10.01–10.22.

23.

Sivakumar, L., Reddy, K. L., and Sundarrajan, N. Detailed circulation analysis to determine the DNB margin in natural circulation boilers. In Proceedings of International Conference on Heat and mass transfer, Hyderabad, India, 13–16 February 1980, pp. 1–8.

24.

Chien

K. L.

Ergin

E. I.

Ling

Lee

Dynamic analysis of a boiler. Trans. ASME, 1958, 80, 1809–1819.

25.

Mc Donald, J. P. and Kwatny, H. G. A mathematical model for reheat boiler-turbine-generator systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Winter Power Meeting, New York, 25–30 January 1970, pp. 1–19.

26.

Dharmalingam

Sivakumar

Anil Kumar

K. K.

Simplified approximations for the accumulation value and time constant for an evaporator system in drum-type boilers. Proc. IMechE, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 2010, 224, 59–67.

27.

Cotton

K. C.

Evaluating and improving steam turbine performance, June 1998 (New York, Cotton Fact).

28.

Sivakumar, L. and Ganapathiraman, G. Performance analysis diagnostics and optimisation in generation. In Proceedings of Conference on IT in power: improving performance and productivity, New Delhi, India, 13–14 September 2006, pp. 3–19.

29.

Channiwala

S. A.

Parikh

P. P.

A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel, 2002, 81, 1051–1063.

30.

Ferreira, L. S., Rodrigues, C. P., Secchi, A. R., Trierweiler, J. O., Lansarin, M. A., Marczak, L. D. F., and Mendes, T. F. Modeling and simulation of a pulverized coal boiler. In Proceedings of the 2nd Mercosur Congress on Chemical engineering, Rio de Janeiro , Brazil, 14–18 August 2005, pp. 1–10.