Performance and flow fields of a supersonic axial turbine at off-design conditions

Abstract

The increasing demand of energy efficiency and the utilisation of small-scale energy sources require efficient, small and versatile turbines. Supersonic turbines have a high power density and therefore small size and fewer stages than the subsonic ones. However, the performance of a supersonic turbine can decrease rapidly when operating at off-design conditions. This raises a need for the improvement of the turbine off-design performance. In this article, a supersonic axial flow turbine is studied numerically to find the causes of efficiency decrement. This article presents the most thorough study so far about the reasons that lead to the decreased off-design performance with supersonic axial flow turbines and explains the loss sources individually for the stator and the rotor. Three operating conditions are studied, and it is suggested that at the lower than design pressure ratios, the shock losses of the stator decrease while simultaneously the stator secondary losses increase. The high positive incidence at the lowest modelled pressure ratio, mass flow and rotational speed caused a significant decrease in the rotor and stage performance. This highlights the importance of incidence even in shock-driven supersonic turbine flows.

Keywords

Axial turbine supersonic flow off-design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dorney

Griffin

Huber

. A study of the effects of tip clearance in a supersonic turbine. J Turbomachinery 2000; 122: 674–683.

Dorney

Griffin

Huber

Sondak

. Unsteady flow in a supersonic turbine with variable specific heats. J Prop Power 2002; 18: 493–496.

Yasa

Paniagua

Bussolin

. Performance analysis of a transonic high-pressure turbine. Proc IMechE Part A: J Power Energy 2007; 221: 769–778.

Kacker

Okapuu

. A mean line prediction method for axial flow turbine efficiency. J Turbomachinery 1982; 104: 111–119.

Woinowsky-Krieger

Lavoie

J-P

Vlasic

Moustapha

. Off-design performance of a single-stage transonic turbine. J Turbomachinery 1999; 121: 177–183.

Snedden G, Dunn D, Ingram G and Gregory-Smith D. The performance of a generic non-axisymmetric end wall in a single stage rotating turbine at on and off-design conditions. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, Glasgow, UK, 2010, paper no. GT2010–22006 New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), pp.1069–1080.

Jouini

DBM

Sjolander

Moustapha

. Aerodynamic performance of a transonic turbine cascade at off-design conditions. J Turbomachinery 2001; 123: 510–518.

Benner

Sjolander

Moustapha

. An empirical prediction method for secondary losses in turbines – Part I: A new loss breakdown scheme and penetration depth correlation. J Turbomachinery 2006; 128: 273–280.

Munday

Heeb

Gutmark

Liu

Kailasanath

. Supersonic jet noise reduction technologies for gas turbine engines. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2011; 133: 101201–101201.

10.

Grönman

Turunen-Saaresti

. Design and off-design performance of a supersonic axial flow turbine with different stator-rotor axial gaps. Proc IMechE Part A: J Power Energy 2011; 225: 497–503.

11.

Roe

. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. J Comput Phys 1981; 43: 357–372.

12.

Lombard CK, Bardina J, Venkatapathy E and Oliger J. Multi-dimensional formulation of CSCM – An upwind flux difference eigenvector split method for compressible Navier–Stokes equations. In: 6th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference, Danvers, MA, 13–15 July 1983, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), paper no. 83–1895-CP, pp.649–664.

13.

Chien

. Predictions of channel and boundary-layer flows with a low-Reynolds-number turbulence model. AIAA J 1982; 20: 33–38.

14.

Siikonen

. An application of Roe’s flux-difference splitting for the k-ɛ turbulence model. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 1995; 21: 1017–1039.

15.

Jaatinen

. Performance improvement of centrifugal compressor stage with pinched geometry or vaned diffuser, Dissertation, Lappeenranta University of Technology: Finland, 2009.

16.

Harinck

Turunen-Saaresti

Colonna

Rebay

van Buijtenen

. Computational study of a high-expansion ratio radial organic Rankine cycle turbine stator. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2010; 132: 054501–054501.

17.

Turunen-Saaresti T, Tang J, van Buijtenen J and Larjola J. Experimental and numerical study of real-gas flow in a supersonic ORC turbine nozzle. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo, Barcelona, Spain, 2006, paper no. GT2006–91118 new york: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), pp. 1527–1533.

18.

Hoffren

Talonpoika

Larjola

Siikonen

. Numerical simulation of real-gas flow in a supersonic turbine nozzle ring. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2002; 124: 395–403.

19.

Sonoda

Arima

Olhofer

Sendhoff

Kost

Giess

P-A

. A study of advanced high-loaded transonic turbine airfoils. J Turbomachinery 2006; 128: 650–657.

20.

Harrison

. The influence of blade lean on turbine losses. J Turbomachinery 1992; 114: 184–190.

21.

. Three-dimensional unsteady Navier–Stokes analysis of stator–rotor interaction in axial-flow turbines. Proc IMechE Part A: J Power Energy 2000; 219: 13–22.