Numerical investigation of three turbulence simulation models for S809 wind turbine airfoil

Abstract

The contributions in terms of energy production and reliability benefits of horizontal axis wind turbines are growing on a yearly basis throughout the world, which has made them the predominant technology for wind energy harvesting. When numerically simulating wind turbines, the selection of turbulence modelling approach can be of pivotal importance since it defines the numerical costs and gains of the simulation. In this paper, 2D computational fluid analysis of S809 Don Somners airfoil is targeted to evaluate the merits, drawbacks, and capabilities of three different common turbulence-modeling approaches, namely Spalart-Allmaras, k-w SST, and Transition SST models. The results are validated through comparison against experimental data on pressure coefficient distribution; a significant agreement between experimental data and Transition SST model is observed, which makes this model the reference model in this study. The other two approaches are compared with the results of the aforementioned model in terms of pressure distribution and flow separation predictions. The results indicate that k-w and Spalart-Allmaras models are as reliable as Transition SST when the Reynolds number and angle of attack are high enough (i.e. higher than 10 to 12°). At low Reynolds numbers, which means under 5 to 6°, the reference model is observed to be the most reliable among the three. The results of this study are of great importance when full rotor simulation is the task in hand, since they define the most appropriate approach to use with each flow condition to achieve an optimized numerical simulation procedure.

Keywords

Wind turbine airfoils CFD turbulence modelling S809 Don Somners airfoil renewable energy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

IEA World Energy Outlook1, www.iea.org (accessed 26 April 2017).

Jha AR. Wind turbine technology. US: CRC Press, 2010.

Anderson

Wendt

. Computational fluid dynamics. (Vol. 206), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.

Hirsch

. Numerical computation of internal and external flows: the fundamentals of computational fluid dynamics, Jordan Hill, Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007.

Tanabe

Kobayashi

Nakano

et al.

Evaluation of thermal comfort using combined multi-node thermoregulation (65MN) and radiation models and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Energy Build 2002; 34: 637–646.

Norton

Sun

. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) – an effective and efficient design and analysis tool for the food industry: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2006; 17: 600–620.

Norton

Sun

Grant

et al.

Applications of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in the modelling and design of ventilation systems in the agricultural industry: a review. Bioresource Technol 2007; 98: 2386–2414.

Wang

Chen

. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 2000; 147: 4485–4493.

Foussekis

Fraunié

Béguier

. Steady and unsteady separated flows around a profile. Application on the wind turbines. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1992; 39: 41–49.

10.

Srinivasan

Ekaterinaris

McCroskey

. Evaluation of turbulence models for unsteady flows of an oscillating airfoil. Comput Fluids 1995; 24: 833–861.

11.

Bermúdez

Velázquez

Matesanz

. Viscous–inviscid method for the simulation of turbulent unsteady wind turbine airfoil flow. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2002; 90: 643–661.

12.

Baxevanou

Chaviaropoulos

Voutsinas

et al.

Evaluation study of a Navier–Stokes CFD aeroelastic model of wind turbine airfoils in classical flutter. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2008; 96: 1425–1443.

13.

Dubcová

Feistauer

Horáček

et al.

Numerical simulation of airfoil vibrations induced by turbulent flow. J Comput Appl Math 2008; 218: 34–42.

14.

Sandberg

Jones

. Reprint of: direct numerical simulations of airfoil self-noise. Procedia IUTAM 2010; 1: 274–282.

15.

Yao

Yuan

Xie

et al.

Numerical simulation of aerodynamic performance for two dimensional wind turbine airfoils. Proc Eng 2012; 31: 80–86.

16.

Yang

Shen

et al.

Prediction of the wind turbine performance by using BEM with airfoil data extracted from CFD. Renewable Energy 2014; 70: 107–115.

17.

Rocha

Carneiro

et al.

A case study on the calibration of the k–ω SST (shear stress transport) turbulence model for small scale wind turbines designed with cambered and symmetrical airfoils. Energy 2016; 97: 144–150.

18.

Somers DM. Design and experimental results for the S809 airfoil (No. NREL/SR–440-6918). Golden, USA: National Renewable Energy Lab, 1997.

19.

Sumner

Watters

Masson

. CFD in wind energy: the virtual, multiscale wind tunnel. Energies 2010; 3: 989–1013.

20.

Anderson

Wendt

. Computational fluid dynamics. (Vol. 206), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.

21.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds-averaged_Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_equations (accessed 6 April 2017).

22.

Spalart

Allmaras

. A one equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. Recherche Aerospatiale 1994; 1: 5–21.

23.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spalart%E2%80%93Allmaras_turbulence_model (accessed 6 April 2017).

24.

Menter

. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 1994; 32: 1598–1605.

25.

Wilcox DC. Turbulence modeling for CFD. (Vol. 2, pp. 103–217). La Canada, CA: DCW Industries, 1998.

26.

https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/langtrymenter_4eqn.html (accessed 6 April 2017).

27.

Langtry

Gola

Menter

. Predicting 2D airfoil and 3D wind turbine rotor performance using a transition model for general CFD codes. AIAA paper 2006, pp. 395–395.

28.

Klausmeyer SM and John C. Comparative results from a CFD challenge over a 2D three-element high-lift airfoil, 1997. ntrs.nasa.gov.

29.

Kim

Lee

. Predicting the aerodynamic characteristics of 2D airfoil and the performance of 3D wind turbine using a CFD code. Trans Korean Soc Mech Eng B 2008; 32: 549–557.

30.

Sørensen

. CFD modelling of laminar‐turbulent transition for airfoils and rotors using the γ − model. Wind Energy 2009; 12: 715–733.

31.

Fluent I. Fluent 6. 3 user’s guide. https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Fluent6/html/ug/node370.htm (accessed 10 September 2017).