Job security regulations, here understood as restrictions on hiring and firing, figure prominently in the policy recommendations of international organizations or national reform programmes. However, in contrast to the prominence of job security regulations in the current reform discourse, hardly any attention is paid to their determinants. In this article, the insider/outsider theory of employment and unemployment is examined. Advocates of this approach argue that job security regulations mainly benefit the labour market insiders. As a consequence, insiders will fight all reforms that aim to dismantle these regulations. The insiders are supported by Social Democratic parties, which only represent the interests of the insiders. In this article it is maintained that this simple argument is wrong. Labour market outsiders can be expected to be equally supportive of job security regulations and Social Democratic parties as labour market insiders. This claim is supported by the empirical analysis using survey data.
Albrekt Larsen, C. (2006) The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes. How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support. Hampshire/Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
2.
Anderson, C.J. and Pontusson, J. (2007) `Workers, Worries, and Welfare States: Social Protection and Employment Insecurity in 15 OECD Countries', European Journal of Political Research46 (2): 211-35.
3.
Auer, P. (2006) `Protected Mobility for Employment and Decent Work: Labour Market Security in a Globalized World', Journal of Industrial Relations48 (1): 21-40.
4.
Bean, C. (1994) `European Unemployment: a Survey', Journal of Economic Literature32 (2): 573-619.
5.
Bertola, G. (1996) `Comment on Gilles Saint-Paul's "Exploring the Political Economy of Labour Market Institutions"', Economic Policy11 (23): 304-6.
6.
Blanchard, O. (2006) `European Unemployment: the Evolution of Facts and Ideas', Economic Policy21 (45): 5-59.
7.
Blanchard, O. and Portugal, P. (2001) `What Hides Behind an Unemployment Rate: Comparing Portuguese and U.S. Labor Markets', American Economic Review91 (1): 187-207.
8.
Blanchard, O. and Wolfers, J. (2000). `The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: the Aggregate Evidence', Economic Journal110 (462): C1-C33.
9.
Blanchflower, D.G. (1990) `Book Review: The Insider- Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment', Economic Journal100 (403): 1370-3.
10.
Botero, J.C., Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2004) `The Regulation of Labor', Quarterly Journal of Economics119 (4): 1139-382.
11.
Cusack, T., Iversen, T. and Rehm, P. (2006) `Risks at Work: the Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution', Oxford Review of Economic Policy22 (3): 365-89.
12.
Dalton, R.J. (2006) Citizen Politics. Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 4th edn. Washington DC: CQ Press.
13.
Di Tella, R. and MacCulloch, R. (2005) `The Consequences of Labor Market Flexibility: Panel Evidence Based on Survey Data', European Economic Review49 (5): 1225-59.
14.
Erikson, R.S., MacKuen, M.B. and Stimson, J.A. (2002) The Macro Polity. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
15.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1996) `Welfare States Without Work: the Impasse of Labour Shedding and Familialism in Continental European Social Policy', in G. Esping-Andersen (ed.) Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.
16.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies . New York: Oxford University Press .
17.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2000) `Who is Harmed by Labour Market Regulations? Quantitative Evidence', in G. Esping-Andersen and M. Regini (eds) Why Deregulate Labour Markets?New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Estevez-Abe, M. (2005) `Gender Bias in Skills and Social Policies: the Varieties of Capitalism Perspective on Sex Segregation', Social Politics12 (2): 180-215.
19.
Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2001) `Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: a Reinterpretation of the Welfare State', in P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds) Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage . New York: Oxford University Press .
20.
Ferrera, M., Hemerijck, A. and Rhodes, M. (2001) `The Future of the European "Social Model" in the Global Economy', Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis3 (2): 163-90.
21.
Garibaldi, P. and Mauro, P. (2002) `Anatomy of Employment Growth', Economic Policy17 (34): 67-113.
22.
Goldthorpe, J.H. (2000) On Sociology. Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Goodin, R.E., Headey, B., Muffels, R. and Dirven, H-J. (1999) The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Hakim, C. (1995) `Five Feminist Myths about Women's Employment' , British Journal of Sociology46 (3): 429-55.
25.
Harrison, E. and Rose, D. (2006) The European Socio-economic Classification (ESeC) User Guide. Essex: Institute for Social and Economic Research.
26.
Häusermann, S. and Palier, B. (2008) `The Politics of Employment-friendly Welfare Reforms in Post-Industrial Economies', Socio-Economic Review6 (3): 559-86.
27.
Hernes, G. (1992) `We Are Smarter than We Think. A Rejoinder to Smelser' , Rationality and Society4 (4): 421-36.
28.
Hibbs Jr, D.A. (1977) `Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy', American Political Science Review71 (4): 1467-87.
29.
IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2003) World Economic Outlook. Washington DC: IMF.
30.
Iversen, T. (2005) Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2001) `An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences' , American Political Science Review95 (4): 875-93.
32.
Kangas, O.E. (1997) `Self-Interest and the Common Good: the Impact of Norms, Selfishness and Context in Social Policy Opinions', Journal of Socio-Economics26 (5): 475-94.
33.
Kenworthy, L. (2003) `Do Affluent Countries Face an Incomes-Jobs Trade-Off?' , Comparative Political Studies36 (10): 1180-209.
34.
Kenworthy, L. (2004) Egalitarian Capitalism: Jobs, Incomes, and Growth in Affluent Countries. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
Kitschelt, H. and Rehm, P. (2006) `New Social Risks and Political Preferences', in K. Armingeon and G. Bonoli (eds) The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. Adapting Post-war Social Policies to New Social Risks. London/New York: Routledge.
36.
Lindbeck, A. and Snower, D.J. (1988) The Insider- Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge, MA/London : MIT Press.
37.
Lindbeck, A. and Snower, D.J. (2001) `Insiders Versus Outsiders', Journal of Economic Perspectives15 (1): 165-88.
38.
Lindert, P.H. (2004) Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century, Vol. 2: Further Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Lucifora, C., McKnight, A. and Salverda, W. (2005) `Lowwage Employment in Europe: a Review of the Evidence', Socio-Economic Review3 (2): 259-92.
40.
Meltzer, A.H. and Richard, S.F. (1981) `A Rational Theory of the Size of Government', Journal of Political Economy89 (5): 914-27.
41.
Moene, K.O. and Wallerstein, M. (2001) `Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution' , American Political Science Review95 (4): 859-74.
42.
Neugart, M. (2008) `The Choice of Insurance in the Labor Market', Public Choice134 (3-4): 445-62.
43.
Nickell, S. and van Ours, J.C. (2000) `The Netherlands and the United Kingdom: a European Unemployment Miracle?', Economic Policy15 (30): 136-80.
44.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1994) The Jobs Study. Paris: OECD.
45.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2004) Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.
46.
Pierson, P. (2001) `Coping with Permanent Austerity. Welfare State Retrenchment in Affluent Democracies', in P. Pierson (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
Pontusson, J. (2005) Inequality and Prosperity. Social Europe vs. Liberal America. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
48.
Postel-Vinay, F. and Saint-Martin, A. (2003) `Comment les Salaries Percoivent la Protection de l'Emploi', mimeo.
49.
Powell Jr., G.B. (1982) Contemporary Democracies. Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge, MA/ London : Harvard University Press.
50.
Romer, D. (1975) `Individual Welfare, Majority Voting, and the Properties of a Linear Income Tax', Journal of Public Economics4 (2): 163-85.
51.
Rueda, D. (2005) `Insider-Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: the Challenge to Social Democratic Parties', American Political Science Review99 (1): 61-74.
52.
Rueda, D. (2006) `Social Democracy and Active Labour-market Policies: Insiders, Outsiders and the Politics of Employment Promotion', British Journal of Political Science36 (3): 385-406.
53.
Saint-Paul, G. (1996) `Exploring the Political Economy of Labour Market Institutions', Economic Policy11 (23): 265-315.
54.
Saint-Paul, G. (2002) `The Political Economy of Employment Protection' , Journal of Political Economy110 (3): 672-704.
55.
Saint-Paul, G. (2004) `Why are European Countries Diverging in their Unemployment Experience?' Journal of Economic Perspectives18 (4): 49-68.
56.
Samek Lodovici, M. (2000) `The Dynamics of Labour Market Reform in European Countries', in G. Esping-Andersen and M. Regini (eds) Why Deregulate Labour Markets?New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
Sarfati, H. (2003) `Welfare and Labour Market Reforms: a New Framework for Social Dialogue and Collective Bargaining?', European Journal of Industrial Relations9 (3): 265-82.
58.
Siebert, H. (1997) `Labor Market Rigidities: at the Root of Unemployment in Europe', Journal of Economic Perspectives11 (3): 37-54.
59.
Siegel, N.A. (2007) `The Changing Contours of Product Market Regulation and Employment Protection Legislation in OECD Countries, 1980-2003', in F. G. Castles (ed.) The Disappearing State?Cheltenham: Edward Elgar .
60.
Simon, H.A. (1985) `Human Nature in Politics: the Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science', American Political Science Review79 (2): 293-304.
61.
Sinn, H-W. (1995) `A Theory of the Welfare State', Scandinavian Journal of Economics97 (4): 495-526.
62.
Steenbergen, M.R. (2006) `A Theory of Partisan Ambivalence', paper read at annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association (Apr.), Chicago.
63.
Sturzenegger, F. and Tommasi, M. (1998) `Introduction', in F. Sturzenegger and M. Tommasi (eds) The Political Economy of Reform. Cambridge MA/London: MIT Press.
64.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1991) `Welfare State Regimes and Welfare Citizenship' , Journal of European Social Policy1 (2): 93-105.
65.
Tsakalotos, E. (2004) `Market Constraints, Economic Performances and Political Power: Modernizers Versus Leftists', Socio-Economic Review2 (3): 415-24.
66.
World Bank (2004) Doing Business in 2004: Understanding Regulation. Washington DC: World Bank.
