Normative implications of ecophenomenology. Towards a deep anthropo-related environmental ethics

Abstract

Corporeality of human beings should be taken seriously and be included in their self-understanding as the ‘nature we are ourselves’. Such an ecophenomenological account has important normative implications. Firstly, I argue that the instrumental value of nature can be particularly well justified based on an ecophenomenological approach. Secondly, sentience is inseparable from corporeality. Therefore, insofar as it is a concern of the ecophenomenological approach to take corporeality and its implications seriously, sentient beings deserve direct moral consideration. Thirdly, it can strengthen the so-far underestimated category of eudaimonic values of nature, which can be best developed through an ecophenomenological reconstruction. Taken together, ecophenomenology is vital for environmental ethics and helps us to leave behind its widespread ‘centrism’. Ecophenomenology should therefore, both methodically and philosophically, be included in the discussion of environmental ethical problems.

Keywords

Ecophenomenology lived body nature anthropocentrism values

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abram

(1996) The Spell of the Sensuous. Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World. New York: Vintage Books.

Abram

(2004) Reciprocity. In Flotz

Frodeman

(eds) Rethinking Nature. Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 77–92.

Alloa

Depraz

(2019 [2012]) Edmund Husserl – “Ein merkwürdig unvollkommen konstituiertes Ding”. In Alloa

et al. (eds) Leiblichkeit. Geschichte und Aktualität eines Begriffs. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 7–22.

Assessment

(2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Berleant

(2004) The Aesthetics of Art and Nature. In Berleant

Carlson

(eds) The Aesthetics of Natural Environments. Peterborough: Broadview Press, pp. 76–88.

Birnbacher

(2009) What motivates us to care for the (distant) future? In: Gosseries

Meyer

(eds) Intergenerational Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 273–300.

Böhme

(1989) Für eine ökologische Naturästhetik. Erstausg., 1. Aufl. edn, Edition Suhrkamp. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Böhme

(1992) Natürlich Natur. Über Natur im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Böhme

(2002) Die Natur vor uns. Naturphilosophie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, Die graue Reihe 33. Zug: Graue Edition.

10.

Böhme

(2003) Leibsein als Aufgabe. Leibphilosophie in pragmatischer Hinsicht. Zug: Die graue Edition.

11.

Böhme

(2010) Das Gegebene und das Gemachte. In Großheim

Kluck

(eds) Phänomenologie und Kulturkritik. Über die Grenzen der Quantifizierung. Freiburg i. Br.: Karl Alber. pp. 140–150.

12.

Böhme

(2016) Naturphänomenologie. In Ott

et al. (eds) Handbuch Umweltethik. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, pp. 100–105.

13.

Böhme

(2019) Leib: Die Natur, die wir selbst sind. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

14.

Böhme

(1995) Atmosphäre. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

15.

Böhme

(2013/2014) Das Schwinden der Natur. Scheidewege 43: 14–23.

16.

Booth

(2021) Becoming a Place of Unrest: Environmental Crisis and Ecophenomenological Praxis. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.

17.

Brenner

(2003) Tierethik als Ethik der Wahrnehmung? In Brenner

(ed) Tiere beschreiben. Erlangen: Harald Fischer Verlag, pp. 67–85.

18.

Brown

Toadvine

(2003a) Eco-phenomenology: Back to the Earth Itself. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

19.

Brown

Toadvine

(2003b) Eco-phenomenology. An introduction. In Brown

Toadvine

(eds) Eco-phenomenology: Back to the Earth Itself. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. ix–xxi.

20.

Cafaro

Sandler

(2005) Environmental Virtue Ethics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

21.

Carlson

(2009) Nature and Landscape: An Introduction to Environmental Aesthetics. New York: Columbia University Press.

22.

Chan

KMA

Balvanera

Benessaiah

, et al. (2016) Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113(6): 1462–1465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113

23.

Chiesa

Brito

(2022) Learning to walk with turtles: Steps towards a sacred perception of the environment. Environmental Values 31(2): 177–192. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327120X16033868459511

24.

Deitz

(2017) Physis/nomos, physis/thesis. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie online. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.

25.

Deplazes-Zemp

Chapman

(2021) The ABCs of relational values: Environmental values that include aspects of both intrinsic and instrumental valuing. Environmental Values 30(6): 669–693. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327120X15973379803726

26.

Diaconu

(2005) Tasten, Riechen, Schmecken: Eine Ästhetik der anästhesierten Sinne. Vol. 12. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

27.

Diehm

(2003) Natural Disasters. In Brown

Toadvine

(eds) Eco-Phenomenology. Back to the Earth Itself. Albany: State University of New York, pp. 171–186.

28.

Döring

Ott

(2004) Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit, Beiträge zur Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit 1. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.

29.

Eser

(2020) Ökologische Ethik: denken wie ein Berg und handeln wie ein Mensch. Natur und Landschaft 95(9/10): 424–432. https://doi.org/10.17433/9.2020.50153841.425-432

30.

Eser

Potthast

(1999) Naturschutzethik: Eine Einführung für die Praxis. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

31.

Fisher

(2004) What the hills are alive with: In defense of the sounds of nature. In Berleant

(ed) The Aesthetics of Natural Environments. Peterborough: Broadview, pp. 232–252.

32.

Foltz

(1995) Inhabiting the Earth: Heidegger, Environmental Ethics, and the Metaphysics of Nature. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.

33.

Gilliand

(2021) Experiencing values in the flow of events: A phenomenological approach to relational values. Environmental Values 30(6): 715–736. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327121X16141642287692

34.

Gorke

(2010) Eigenwert der Natur. Ethische Begründung und Konsequenzen. Stuttgart: Hirzel.

35.

Greaves

(2019) Movement, wildness and animal aesthetics. Environmental Values 28(4): 449–470. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327119X15576762300703

36.

Großheim

(2021) Lived body (Leib). In Wrathall

(ed) The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 463–465.

37.

Haeckel

(1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Zweiter Band: Allgemeine Entwicklungsgeschichte der Organismen. Berlin: Reimer.

38.

Hannis

(2016) Freedom and Environment: Autonomy, Human Flourishing and the Political Philosophy of Sustainability. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

39.

Himes

Muraca

(2018) Relational values: The key to pluralistic valuation of ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.005

40.

Howarth

(1995) The crisis of ecology: A phenomenological perspective. Environmental Values 4(1): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327195776679619

41.

Husserl

(1973) Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität: Erster Teil: 1905–1920. In Kern

(Ed) Husserliana. Den Haag: Nijhoff, Vol. 13.

42.

Husserl

(2008) Die Lebenswelt: Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. In Sowa

(Ed) Husserliana. Dordrecht: Springer, Vol. 39.

43.

Huth

(2013/1)Negative Integrität”: Das Konzept der Leiblichkeit in der Ethik der Mensch-Tier-Beziehung. TIERethik 5(6): 108–128.

44.

Ingold

(2002) The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London/New York: Routledge.

45.

Jóhannesdóttir

Thorgeirsdottir

(2016) Reclaiming nature by reclaiming the body. Balkan Journal of Philosophy 8(1): 39–48.

46.

Krebs

(1997) Naturethik im Überblick. In Krebs

(ed) Naturethik. Grundtexte der gegenwärtigen tier- und ökoethischen Diskussion. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 337–379.

47.

Krebs

Schuster

Fischer

, et al. (2021) Das Weltbild der Igel. Naturethik einmal anders. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.

48.

Latour

(2004) Politics of Nature How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.

49.

Llewelyn

(1991) Am I obsessed by Bobby? (Humanism of the other animal). In Bernasconi

Critchley

(eds) Re-Reading Levinas, 1st edn. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 234–246.

50.

McKibben

(1989) The End of Nature. New York: Random House.

51.

Meyer

(2022) Die Rolle von Atmosphären in der Naturästhetik. Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 67(2): 93–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.28937/9783787343089_7

52.

Morton

(2007) Ecology without Nature. Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.

53.

Naess

(1973) The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry 17(1): 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682 doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682

54.

Neuteleers

(2020) A fresh look at “relational” values in nature: Distinctions derived from the debate on meaningfulness in life. Environmental Values 29(4): 461–479. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327119X15579936382699

55.

Norton

Sanberg

(2021) Relational values: A unifying idea in environmental ethics and evaluation? Environmental Values Fast Track 30(6): 695–714. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327120X16033868459458

56.

Norton

(1987) Why Preserve Natural Variety? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

57.

Ott

(1997) Ipso Facto. Zur ethischen Begründung normativer Implikate wissenschaftlicher Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

58.

Ott

(2004) Begründungen, Ziele und Prioritäten im Naturschutz. In Fischer

(ed), Projektionsfläche Natur. Zum Zusammenhang von Naturbildern und gesellschaftlichen Verhältnissen. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press.

59.

Ott

(2008) A modest proposal of how to proceed in order to solve the problem of inherent moral value in nature. In Westra

, et al. (eds) Reconciling Human Existence with Ecological Integrity. London/Sterling: Earthscan, pp. 39–60.

60.

Ott

(2010) Umweltethik zur Einführung, Zur Einführung 377: Junius.

61.

Ott

(2016) On the meaning of eudemonic arguments for a deep anthropocentric environmental ethics. New German Critique 43(128)): 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-3511895

62.

Ott

(2020) Mapping, arguing and reflecting environmental values: Toward conceptual synthesis. In Lysaker

(ed) Between Closeness and Evil. A Festschrift for Arne Johan Vetlesen. Oslo: Scandinavian Academic Press, pp. 263–292.

63.

Ott

(forthcoming). Menschenbilder und Anthropologie in der Umweltethik. In Zichy

(ed) Handbuch Menschenbilder. Wiesbaden: Springer.

64.

Pelluchon

(2019) Ethik der Wertschätzung. Tugenden für eine ungewisse Welt. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

65.

Pelluchon

(2021) Das Zeitalter des Lebendigen. Eine neue Philosophie der Aufklärung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

66.

Plessner

(1970 [1941]) Lachen und Weinen. In Plessner

(ed), Philosophische Anthropologie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, pp.11–71.

67.

Regan

(1982) All That Dwell Therein: Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

68.

Rigby

(2011) Gernot Böhme’s ecological aesthetics of atmosphere. In Goodbody

Rigby

(eds), Ecocritical Theory: New European Approaches. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, pp. 139–154.

69.

Schmitz

(1980) Herkunft und Schicksal der Ästhetik. In Lützeler

(ed) Kulturwissenschaften. Festgabe für Wilhelm Perpeet. Bonn: Bouvier, pp. 388–413.

70.

Schmitz

(2011). Der Leib. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

71.

Schmitz

(2018) Der unerschöpfliche Gegenstand. Grundzüge der Philosophie. 4. Auflage edn. Bonn: Bouvier.

72.

Scott

(2018) A phenomenological theory of ecological responsibility and its implications for moral agency in climate change. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31(6): 645–659.

73.

Seel

(1991) Eine Ästhetik der Natur. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

74.

Singer

(2015 [1975]). Animal Liberation: The Definitive Classic of the Animal Movement. New York: Open Road Media.

75.

Stetson

(2013) The Wild Muir: Twenty-Two of John Muir's Greatest Adventures. Yosemite National Park, CA: Yosemite Conservancy.

76.

Thomas

(1996) Selbst-Natur-sein: Leibphänomenologie als Naturphilosophie. Vol. Bd. 4, Lynkeus. Studien zur Neuen Phänomenologie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

77.

Valera

(2018) Home, ecological self and self-realization: Understanding asymmetrical relationships through Arne Næss’s ecosophy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Volume 31(6): 661–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9715-x

78.

Vogel

(2015) Thinking like a Mall: Environmental Philosophy after the End of Nature. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.

79.

Waldenfels

(1992) Einführung in die Phänomenologie, UTB: Philosophie, Soziologie, Literaturwissenschaft. München: Fink.

80.

Wilson

(1984) Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

81.

Wolf

(1990) Das Tier in der Moral. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

82.

Wood

(2001) What is ecophenomenology? Research in Phenomenology 31: 78–95.

83.

Zimmermann

(2003) Heideger, phenomenology and contemporary environmentalism. In Brown

Toadvine

(eds) Eco-Phenomenology. Back to the Earth Itself. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp.73–102.