Nursing continues to gain legitimation epistemologically and ontologically as a scientific discipline throughout the world. If a profession gains respect as a true autonomous scientific profession, then this recognition has to be put in practice in all environments and geographical areas. Nursing professional dignity, as a self-regarding concept, does not have a clear definition in the literature, and it has only begun to be analyzed in the last 10 years.
Objectives:
The purpose of this meta-synthesis was to determine the various factors that constitute the notion of nursing professional dignity. The target was to create a tentative model of the concept.
Research design:
The research design was a meta-synthesis (N = 15 original articles) of nursing professional dignity described in the literature, based on the guidelines by Noblit and Hare.
Method and findings:
Original studies were sought out from electronic databases and manual searches. The selection of literature was conducted on stages based on titles (n = 2595), abstracts (n = 70), and full-texts (n = 15) according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. From this analysis, a clear definition of nursing professional dignity emerged that underscored two main macro-dimensions constituting this intertwined, multidimensional, and complex notion: characteristics of the human beings and workplace elements.
Conclusion:
The recognition of nursing professional dignity could have a positive impact on patients because the results clearly showed that nurses are more prone to foster patients’ dignity, patients’ safety, and a better quality of care if their own dignity is respected. If nurses are uncomfortable, humiliated, or not seen in their professional role, it is difficult to give to others good care, good support, or good relationships.
CairnsDWilliamsVVictorCThe meaning and importance of dignified care: findings from a survey of health and social care professionals. BMC Geriatr2013; 13: 28.
2.
HallEOHoyB. Re-establishing dignity: nurses’ experiences of caring for older hospital patients. Scand J Caring Sci2012; 26: 287–294.
3.
ChochinovHM. Dignity-conserving care: a new model for palliative care. JAMA2002; 287: 2253–2260.
4.
ChochinovHM. Dignity and the eye of the beholder. J Clin Oncol2004; 22: 1336–1340.
5.
BaillieLGallagherA. Respecting dignity in care in diverse care settings: strategies of UK nurses. Int J Nurs Pract2011; 17: 336–341.
6.
BagheriHYaghmaeiFAshktorabTPatient dignity and its related factors in heart failure patients. Nurs Ethics2012; 19: 316–327.
7.
DeanE. Dignity in toileting. Nurs Stand2012; 26: 18–20.
8.
StievanoADe MarinisMGRoccoGProfessional dignity in nursing in clinical and community workplaces. Nurs Ethics2012; 19: 341–356.
9.
LawlessJMossC. Exploring the value of dignity in the work-life of nurses. Contemp Nurse2007; 24: 226–236.
10.
YaldenBJMcCormackB. Constructions of dignity: a pre-requisite for flourishing in the workplace?Int J Older People Nurs2010; 5: 137–147.
11.
United Nations. Universal declaration of human rights. General Assembly of the United Nations, http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/(1948, accessed 9 July 2013).
12.
HortonKTschudinVForgetA. The value of nursing: a literature review. Nurs Ethics2007; 14: 716–740.
13.
PeláezM. L’arte di vivere bene: beni, virtù, norme [The art of good living: good, virtues, rules]. Milano: Ares, 2007 (in Italian).
14.
VanlaereLGastmansC. A personalist approach to care ethics. Nurs Ethics2011; 18: 161–173.
15.
EdlundMLindwallLvon PostIConcept determination of human dignity. Nurs Ethics. Epub ahead of print 27 June 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0969733013487193.
16.
RassinM. Nurses’ professional and personal values. Nurs Ethics2008; 15: 614–630.
17.
MacklinR. Dignity is a useless concept. BMJ2003; 327: 1419–1420.
18.
LubanD. Human dignity, humiliation and torture. Kennedy Inst Ethics J2009; 19: 211–230.
19.
KolnaiA. Dignity. In: DillonRS (ed.) Dignity, character, and self-respect. New York: Routledge, 1995, pp. 53–75.
20.
KillmisterS. Dignity: not such a useless concept. J Med Ethics2010; 36: 160–164.
21.
JacobsonN. Dignity and health: a review. Soc Sci Med2007; 64: 292–302.
22.
BondasTHallEOC. Challenges in approaching meta-synthesis research. Qual Health Res2007; 17: 113–121.
23.
ZimmerL. Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. J Adv Nurs2006; 53: 311–318.
24.
MisztalB. The idea of dignity: its modern significance. Eur J Soc Theor2012; 16: 101–121.
25.
MairisED. Concept clarification in professional practice: dignity. J Adv Nurs1994; 19: 947–953.
26.
HaddockJ. Towards further clarification of the concept “dignity.”J Adv Nurs1996; 24: 924–931.
27.
Griffin-HeslinVL. An analysis of the concept dignity. Accid Emerg Nurs2005; 13: 251–257.
28.
SulmasyDP. The varieties of human dignity: a logical and conceptual analysis. Med Health Care Philos. Epub ahead of print27 March2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-012-9400–1.
29.
SulmasyDP. Human dignity and human worth. In: LickissNMalpasJ (eds) Perspectives on human dignity: a conversation, Dordrecht: Springer, 2007, pp. 9–18.
30.
NoblitGWHareRD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.
31.
OlthuisGLegetCDekkersW. Why hospice nurses need high self-esteem. Nurs Ethics2007; 14: 62–71.
32.
StorchJLKennyN. Shared moral work of nurses and physicians. Nurs Ethics2007; 14(4): 478–491.
33.
MalloyDCHadjistavropoulosTMcCarthyEFCulture and organizational climate: nurses’ insights into their relationship with physicians. Nurs Ethics2009; 16: 719–733.
34.
KangasniemiMHalkoahoALänsimies-AntikainenHDuties of the patient: a tentative model based on metasynthesis. Nurs Ethics2011; 19: 58–67.
35.
Rahmqvist LinnarsonJBubiniJPerseiusKI. Review: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research into needs and experiences of significant others to critically ill or injured patients. J Clin Nurs2010; 19: 3102–3111.
36.
AndrewsDRBurrJBushyA. Nurses’ self concept and perceived quality of care. J Nurs Care Qual2011; 26: 69–77.
37.
AntoniazziCD. Respect as experienced by registered nurses. West J Nurs Res2011; 33: 745–766.
GallagherA. Dignity and respect for dignity—two key health professional values: implications for nursing practice. Nurs Ethics2004; 11: 587–599.
40.
KhademiMMohammadiEVanakiZ. Nurses’ experiences of violation of their dignity. Nurs Ethics2012; 19: 328–340.
41.
PullonS. Competence, respect and trust: key features of successful interprofessional nurse-doctor relationships. J Interprof Care2008; 22: 133–147.
42.
RobinsonPGormanGSlimmerLPerceptions of effective and ineffective nurse-physician communication in hospitals. Nurs Forum2010; 45: 206–216.
43.
SkeiK. Collaboration at risk: registered nurses experiences on orthopaedic wards. J Clin Nurs2008; 17: 1907–1914.
44.
WellerJMBarrowMGasquoineS. Interprofessional collaboration among junior doctors and nurses in the hospital setting. Med Educ2011; 45: 478–487.
45.
GastmansCDierckx de CasterlèBSchotsmansP. Nursing considered as moral practice: a philosophical ethical interpretation of nursing. Kennedy Inst Ethics J1998; 8: 43–69.
46.
GewirthA. Human dignity as the basis of rights. In: MeyerMJParentWA (eds) The constitution of rights: human dignity and American values. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992, pp. 10–28.
47.
ÖhlénJSegestenK. The professional identity of the nurse: concept analysis and development. J Adv Nurs1998; 28: 720–727.
48.
VarjusSLLeino-KilpiHSuominenT. Professional autonomy of nurses in hospital settings: a review of the literature. Scand J Caring Sci2011; 25: 201–207.
49.
MemarianRSalsaliMVanakiZProfessional ethics as an important factor in clinical competency in nursing. Nurs Ethics2007; 14: 203–214.
LaschingerHKSShamianJThomsonD. Impact of magnet hospital characteristics on nurses’ perceptions of trust, burnout, quality of care, and work satisfaction. Nurs Econ2001; 19: 209–219.
56.
LaschingerHKS. Hospital nurses’ perceptions of respect and organizational justice. J Nurs Adm2004; 34: 354–364.
57.
FaulknerJLaschingerHKS. The effects of structural and psychological empowerment on perceived respect in acute care nurses. J Nurs Manag2008; 16: 214–221.
58.
PurdyNLaschingerHKSFineganJEffects of work environments on nurse and patient outcomes. J Nurs Manag2010; 18: 901–913.
59.
OlsonL. Ethical climate in health care organizations. Int Nurs Rev1995; 42: 85–90.
60.
OlsonL. Hospital nurses’ perceptions of the ethical climate of their work setting. Image J Nurs Sch1998; 30: 345–349, 10.
61.
VesseyJADemarcoRDiFazioR. Bullying, harassment, and horizontal violence in the nursing workforce: the state of the science. Annu Rev Nurs Res2010; 28: 133–157.
62.
CeravoloDJSchwartzDGFoltz-RamosKMStrengthening communication to overcome lateral violence. J Nurs Manag2012; 20: 599–606.
63.
LawlessJ. Why dignity at work is imperative for nurses. Nurs N Z2009; 14: 12–14.
64.
MillerKLReevesSZwarensteinMNursing emotion work and interprofessional collaboration in general internal medicine wards: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs2008; 64: 332–343.
65.
RoseL. Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: how to define?Nurs Crit Care2011; 16: 5–10.
66.
TwiggDMcCulloughK. Nurse retention: a review of strategies to create and enhance positive practice environments in clinical settings. Int J Nurs Stud. Epub ahead of print26 June2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.05.015.
67.
LinSYChiangHYChenIL. Comparing nurses’ intent to leave or stay: differences of practice environment perceptions. Nurs Health Sci2011; 13: 463–467.
68.
PanuntoMRde Brito GuirardelloE. Professional nursing practice: environment and emotional exhaustion among intensive care nurses. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem2013; 21: 765–772.
69.
PapastavrouEEfstathiouGAcarogluRA seven country comparison of nurses’ perceptions of their professional practice environment. J Nurs Manag2012; 20: 236–248.
70.
NantsupawatASrisuphanWKunaviktikulWImpact of nurse work environment and staffing on hospital nurse and quality of care in Thailand. J Nurs Scholarsh2011; 43: 426–432.
