The purpose of this qualitative study was to analyse nurses’ professional dignity in their everyday working lives. We explored the factors that affect nursing professional dignity in practice that emerge in relationships with health professionals, among clinical nurses working in hospitals and in community settings in central Italy. The main themes identified were: (i) nursing professional dignity perceived as an achievement; (ii) recognition of dignity beyond professional roles. These two concepts are interconnected. This study provides insights into professional dignity in nursing being perceived as an achievement linked to the intrinsic dignity of every human being. The ‘nursing professional dignity perceived as an achievement’ was perceived as having declined in different social factors. Some factors of nursing professional dignity perceived as an achievement were attained more easily in community settings. ‘Recognition of dignity beyond professional roles’ underpins the intrinsic dignity as an expression of humanity, embedded in persons regardless of any profession, and values, such as: respect, moral integrity, humility, working conscientiously and kindness.
JacobsBB. Respect for human dignity: a central phenomenon to philosophically unite nursing theory and practice through consilience of knowledge. Adv Nurs Sci2001; 24: 17–35.
2.
ChochinovHM. Dignity-conserving care: a new model for palliative care. JAMA2002; 287: 2253–60.
3.
ChochinovHM. Defending dignity. Palliat Support Care2003; 1: 307–8.
4.
ChochinovHM. Dignity and the eye of the beholder. J Clin Oncol2004; 22: 1336–40.
5.
ChochinovHMHackTHassardTKristjansonLMcClementSHarlosM. Dignity in the terminally ill: a cross-sectional, cohort study. Lancet2002; 360: 2026–30.
6.
ChochinovHMHackTMcClementSKristjansonLHarlosM. Dignity in the terminally ill: a developing empirical model. Soc Sci Med2002; 54: 433–43.
7.
LothianKPhilpI. Maintaining the dignity and autonomy of older people in healthcare setting. Brit Med J2001; 322: 668–70.
8.
JacelonCS. The dignity of elders in an acute care hospital. Qual Health Res2003; 13: 543–56.
9.
JacelonCSConnellyTWBrownRProulxKVoT. A concept analysis of dignity for older adults. J Adv Nurs2004; 48: 76–83.
10.
LawlessJMossC. Exploring the value of dignity in the work-life of nurses. Contemp Nurse2007; 24: 225–36.
11.
GallagherA. Dignity and respect for dignity; two key health professional values: implications for nursing practice. Nurs Ethics2004; 11: 587–99.
12.
JacobsonN. Dignity and health: a review. Soc Sci Med2007; 64: 292–302.
13.
ArmstrongA. Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice. Nurs Philos2006; 7: 110–24.
14.
BegleyAM. Practising virtue: a challenge to the view that a virtue centred approach to ethics lacks practical content. Nurs Ethics2005; 12: 622–37.
15.
DuddleMBoughtonM. Intraprofessional relations in nursing. J Adv Nurs2007; 59: 29–37.
16.
MolyneuxJ. Inter-professional teamworking: what makes teams work well?J Interprof Care2005; 15: 29–35.
17.
PullonS. Competence, respect and trust: key features of successful inter-professional nurse-doctor relationships. J Interprof Care2008; 22: 133–47.
18.
VarjusSLLeino-KilpiHSuominenT. Professional autonomy of nurses in hospital settings: a review of the literature. Scand J Caring Sci2011; 25: 201–7.
19.
IliopoulouKKWhileAE. Professional autonomy and job satisfaction: survey of critical care nurses in mainland Greece. J Adv Nurs2010; 66: 2520–31.
20.
SeedhouseDGallagherA. Undignifying institution. J Med Ethics2002; 28: 368–72.
21.
Van YperenNHagedoornMZweersMPostmaS. Injustice and employees’ destructive responses: the mediating role of state negative affect. Soc Justice Res2000; 13: 291–312.
22.
ColquittJAConlonDEWessonMJPorterCOLHNgKY. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol2001; 86: 425–45.
23.
KramerMHafnerLP. Shared values: impact on staff nurse job satisfaction and perceived productivity. Nurs Res1989; 38: 172–7.
24.
FlynnLCarryerJBudgeC. Organizational attributes valued by hospital, home care, and district nurses in the United States and New Zealand. J Nurs Scholarship2005; 37: 67–72.
25.
LaschingerHKSShamianJThomsonD. Impact of magnet hospital characteristics on nurses' perceptions of trust, burnout, quality of care, and work satisfaction. Nurs Econ2001; 19: 209–19.
26.
VanlaereLGastmansC. A personalist approach to care ethics. Nurs Ethics2011; 18: 161–73.
27.
United Nations. Universal declaration of human rights. General Assembly of the United Nations, 10 December 1948.
28.
PeláezM.L’arte di vivere bene: beni, virtù, norme. (The art of good living: good, virtues, rules.)Milano: Ares, 2007 (in Italian).
29.
HortonR. Rediscovering human dignity. Lancet2004; 364: 1081–5.
30.
SalaRManaraD. The regulation of autonomy in nursing: the Italian situation. Nurs Ethics1999; 6: 451–67.
DilorioCHockenberry-EatonMMaibachERueroT. Focus group: an interview method for nursing research. J Neurosci Nurs1994; 26: 175–80.
33.
MacLeod ClarkJMabenJJonesK. The use of focus group interviews in nursing research: issues and challenges. NT Res1996; 1: 143–53.
34.
SaldañaJ. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2009.
35.
GraneheimUHLundmanB. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today2004; 24: 105–12.
36.
BrymanA. Social research method. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
37.
KramerMSchmalenbergCE. Magnet hospital nurses describe control over nursing practice. West J of Nurs Res2003; 25: 434–52.
38.
KramerMSchmalenbergCE. The practice of clinical autonomy in hospitals: 20000 nurses tell their story. Crit Care Nurse2008; 28: 58–71.
39.
KramerMSchmalenbergCE. Best quality patient care: a historical perspective on magnet hospitals. Nurs Adm Q2005; 29: 275–87.
40.
PeterEHMacfarlaneAVO'Brien-PallasLL.Analysis of the moral habitability of the nursing work environment. J Adv Nurs2004; 47: 356–64.
41.
PaulyBVarcoeCStorchJNewtonL. Registered nurses’ perceptions of moral distress and ethical climate. Nurs Ethics2009; 16: 561–73.
42.
SchluterJWinchSHolzhauserKHendersonA.Nurses’ moral sensitivity and hospital ethical climate: a literature review. Nurs Ethics2008; 15: 304–21.
43.
UlrichCO’DonnellPTaylorCFarrarADanisMGradyC. Ethical climate, ethics stress, and the job satisfaction of nurses and social workers in the United States. Soc Sci Med2007; 65: 1708–19.
44.
GoldmanATabakN.Perception of ethical climate and its relationship to nurses' demographic characteristics and job satisfaction. Nurs Ethics2010; 17: 233–46.
HojatMNascaTJCohenMJMAttitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration: a cross-cultural study of male and female physicians and nurses in the United States and Mexico. Nurs Res2001; 50: 123–8.
47.
HojatMGonnellaJSNascaTJComparisons of American, Israeli, Italian and Mexican physicians and nurses on the total and factor scores of the Jefferson scale of attitudes toward physician-nurse collaborative relationships. Int J Nurs Stud2003; 40: 427–35.
SchmalenbergCKramerM.Nurse-physician relationships in hospitals: 20000 tell their story. Crit Care Nurse2009; 29: 74–83.
50.
BaggsJGSchmittMH. Collaboration between nurses and physicians. Image: J Nurs Scholarship1988; 20: 145–9.
51.
BaxterSKBrumfittSM. Professional differences in inter-professional working. J Interprof Care2008; 22: 239–51.
52.
PaulSPetersonCQ.Inter-professional collaboration: issues for practice and research. Occup Ther Health Care2001; 15: 1–12.
53.
D’AmourDFerrada-VidelaMSan Martin RodriguezLBeaulieuMD. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks. J Interprof Care2005; 19(suppl. 1): 116–31.
54.
SkarR. The meaning of autonomy in nursing practice. J Clin Nurs2010; 19: 2226–34.
55.
LaschingerHKFineganJ. Empowering nurses for work engagement and health in hospital settings. J Nurs Adm2005; 35: 439–49.
56.
LaschingerHKFineganJWilkP. Context matters: the impact of unit leadership and empowerment on nurses' organizational commitment. J Nurs Adm2009; 39: 228–35.
AikenLHClarkeSPSloaneDM.Hospital restructuring: does it adversely affect care and outcomes?J Nurs Admin2000; 3: 457–65.
69.
AikenLHHavensDSSloaneDM. The magnet nursing services recognition program: a comparison of two groups of magnet hospitals. Am J Nurs2000; 100: 26–35.
70.
McCallinA.Interdisciplinary practice – a matter of teamwork: an integrated literature review. J Clin Nurs2001; 10: 419–28.
71.
ReevesSRiceKGotlib ConnLMillerKLKenaszchukCZwarensteinM.Interprofessional interaction, negotiation and non-negotiation on general internal medicine wards. J Interprof Care2009; 23: 633–45.
