This study investigates the effect of strategic entrepreneurial orientation (SEO) and a digital-first mindset (DFM) on firm performance, as well as the mediating role of the DFM. It further explores the moderating effect of competitive pressure on the relationship between SEO and DFM, hypothesising that higher levels of competitive pressure may strengthen this relationship. Using a mixed-method approach, which included field surveys and elite interviews conducted in the United Arab Emirates, the study finds that SEO positively influences a DFM, which in turn significantly improves firm performance. Quantitative analysis revealed that a DFM mediates the relationship between SEO and firm performance, while competitive pressure does not exert a significant moderating effect. However, the qualitative data suggest that all the hypotheses are supported, and that competitive pressure has a partial role in the SEO and DFM relationship. The findings offer critical insights for managers, aiming to optimise performance in increasingly competitive markets.
Abu-RahmaA., & JaleelB. (2017). Influence of managers’ time orientation on strategic practices in the UAE: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 12(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-01-2015-0011
2.
AftabJ., VenezianiM., SarwarH., & IshaqM. I. (2024). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in SMEs: The mediating role of entrepreneurial competencies and moderating role of environmental dynamism. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(10), 3329–3352. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2021-1151
3.
Al-DhaafriH. S., & AlosaniM. S. (2020). Impact of total quality management, organisational excellence and entrepreneurial orientation on organisational performance: Empirical evidence from the public sector in UAE. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(9), 2497–2519. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2020-0082
4.
Al-ShamiS. A., AlsuwaidiA. K. M. S., & AkmalS. (2022). The effect of entrepreneurial orientation on innovation performance in the airport industry through learning orientation and strategic alignment. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), Article 2095887. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2095887
5.
Al‐SwidiA. K., HairJ. F., & Al‐HakimiM. A. (2023). Sustainable development‐oriented regulatory and competitive pressures to shift toward a circular economy: The role of environmental orientation and Industry 4.0 technologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4782–4797. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3393
6.
AlkharafiN., AlsaberA., & AlnajemM. (2024). Exploring entrepreneurial orientation in an emerging economy. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), Article 100553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100553
7.
AlshantyA. M., & EmeagwaliO. L. (2019). Market-sensing capability, knowledge creation and innovation: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(3), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.02.002
BharadwajA., El SawyO. A., PavlouP. A., & VenkatramanN. V. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
10.
BhatiaM. S., & KumarS. (2022). Linking stakeholder and competitive pressure to Industry 4.0 and performance: Mediating effect of environmental commitment and green process innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 1905–1918. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2989
11.
ChenY., HuY., ZhouS., & YangS. (2023). Investigating the determinants of performance of artificial intelligence adoption in hospitality industry during COVID-19. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(8), 2868–2889. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0433
12.
ChenY., WangY., NevoS., JinJ., WangL., & ChowW. S. (2014). IT capability and organizational performance: The roles of business process agility and environmental factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.4
13.
CiampiF., DemiS., MagriniA., MarziG., & PapaA. (2021). Exploring the impact of big data analytics capabilities on business model innovation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Research, 123, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.023
14.
CollettC. I. (2024). Framing gender bias in the design of AI recruitment technology [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford].
15.
CovinJ. G. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
16.
CovinJ. G., & WalesW. J. (2019). Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718773181
17.
CurranP. J., WestS. G., & FinchJ. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
18.
DaradkehM., & MansoorW. (2023). The impact of network orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on startup innovation and performance in emerging economies: The moderating role of strategic flexibility. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), Article 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.02.001
19.
DereraE., ChitakunyeP., & O’NeillC. (2014). The impact of gender on start-up capital: A case of women entrepreneurs in South Africa. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355713513355
20.
Emirates News Agency. (2023). UAE hosts over 2,000 food and beverage manufacturing companies, generating AED28 billion in annual revenue. Retrieved, 4April2026, from https://www.wam.ae/article/aqd57hd-uae-hosts-over-2000-food-and-beverage
21.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
22.
Government of Dubai Media Office. (2024). More than 6,000 new F&B companies joined Dubai Chamber of Commerce during 2023.
23.
GuptaV. K., NiranjanS., & MarkinE. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The mediating role of generative and acquisitive learning through customer relationships. Review of Managerial Science, 14(5), 1123–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00327-6
24.
GurbaxaniV., & DunkleD. (2019). Gearing up for successful digital transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(3), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00017
25.
HairJ. F., HultG. T. M., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
26.
HairJ. F., HultG. T. M., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
27.
HamadH., ElbeltagiI., & El‐GoharyH. (2018). An empirical investigation of business‐to‐business e‐commerce adoption and its impact on SMEs competitive advantage: The case of Egyptian manufacturing SMEs. Strategic Change, 27(3), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2196
28.
HarveyW. S. (2011). Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111404329
29.
HeK., BounckenR. B., KianiA., & KrausS. (2024). The role of strategic orientations for digital innovation: When entrepreneurship meets sustainability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, Article 123503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123503
30.
HenselerJ., RingleC. M., & SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
KhinS., & HoT. C. (2019). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2018-0083
33.
KockN. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEC.2015100101
34.
KrausS., VonmetzK., OrlandiL. B., ZardiniA., & RossignoliC. (2023). Digital entrepreneurship: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and digitalization for disruptive innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, Article 122638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122638
35.
KwartengM. A., NtsifulA., DiegoL. F. P., & NovákP. (2024). Extending UTAUT with competitive pressure for SMEs digitalization adoption in two European nations: A multi-group analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 76(5), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2022-0482
36.
LeechN. L., BarrettK. C., & MorganG. A. (2014). IBM SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation. Routledge.
37.
LeonardiP. M., & NeeleyT. (2022). The digital mindset: What it really takes to thrive in the age of data, algorithms, and AI. Harvard Business Review Press.
38.
LiL. (2022). How to tackle variations in elite interviews: Access, strategies, and power dynamics. Qualitative Research, 22(6), 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794121994475
39.
LiY.-H., HuangJ.-W., & TsaiM.-T. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(4), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.02.004
40.
McClureK., & McNaughtanJ. T. (2021). Proximity to power: The challenges and strategies of interviewing elites in higher education research. The Qualitative Report, 26(3), 874–992. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4615
41.
MintzbergH. (1973). Strategy-making in three modes. California Management Review, 16(2), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164491
42.
MukeshH., & Rajasekharan PillaiK. (2020). Role of institutional ecosystem in entrepreneurship education: An empirical reiteration. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 29(1), 176–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355719893521
43.
NeumanW. L., & RossmanG. (2006). Basics of social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Allyn and Bacon.
44.
PachecoA., FerreiraJ. J., & SimõesJ. (2023). The role of higher education institutions and entrepreneurial orientation in the creation and development of academic spinoffs. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 32(3), 495–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557231210674
45.
RitalaP., BaiyereA., HughesM., & KrausS. (2021). Digital strategy implementation: The role of individual entrepreneurial orientation and relational capital. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171, Article 120961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120961
46.
SarstedtM., RingleC. M., & HairJ. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In HomburgC., KlarmannM., & VombergA. (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
47.
SolbergE., TraavikL. E., & WongS. I. (2020). Digital mindsets: Recognizing and leveraging individual beliefs for digital transformation. California Management Review, 62(4), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620931839
48.
SoomroB. A., & ShahN. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance in a developing country: Strategic entrepreneurship as a mediator. Business Strategy & Development, 3(4), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.122
49.
SuJ., ZhangY., & WuX. (2023). How market pressures and organizational readiness drive digital marketing adoption strategies’ evolution in small and medium enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, Article 122655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122655
50.
SuderM., KusaR., DudaJ., & KarpaczJ. (2024). Exploring impact of entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance–moderators’ variability under changing market conditions. Review of Managerial Science, 19, 797–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00775-9
51.
TajeddiniK., GamageT. C., TajdiniJ., QalatiS. A., & SiddiquiF. (2023). Achieving sustained competitive advantage in retail and consumer service firms: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial bricolage. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, Article 103495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103495
VillangerE. (2015). Entrepreneurial abilities and barriers to microenterprise growth: A case study in Nepal. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24(2), 115–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974927615586888
54.
WeritzP., BraojosJ., MatuteJ., & BenitezJ. (2024). Impact of strategic capabilities on digital transformation success and firm performance: Theory and empirical evidence. European Journal of Information Systems, 34(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2024.2311137
55.
Zawya. (2023). UAE Food & Beverage Business Group reveals trends driving food retail and manufacturing sectors in 2023 annual report. Retrieved, 4April2026, from https://www.zawya.com/en/press-release/research-and-studies/uae-food-and-beverage-business-group-reveals-trends-driving-food-retail-and-manufacturing-sectors-in-2023-annual-report-phbmbpcs
