Exploring the Influence of Mindful Observation,Biospheric Value and Personal Norms in Shaping Pro-environmental Behaviour Among Adolescents: A Mediation Analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2026
Exploring the Influence of Mindful Observation,Biospheric Value and Personal Norms in Shaping Pro-environmental Behaviour Among Adolescents: A Mediation Analysis
Research on pro-environmental behaviour (PEB) among Indian adolescents is limited but growing. The Value-Belief-Norm (VBN) theory suggests that values underlie PEB, but the factors influencing these values require further exploration. Identifying antecedents to values may help instil biospheric values and personal norms among adolescents to foster PEB. This study investigated mindfulness, particularly the observing dimension, as an antecedent predicting PEB. It also explored the mediating roles of biospheric values and personal norms to understand how mindful observation enhances PEB, especially among adolescents. The study involved 642 adolescent school students (329 males, 313 females) aged 13–15. The authors developed self-reported questionnaires in Tamil to assess biospheric values, personal norms and PEB. Mindful observation was evaluated using the Adolescent and Adult Mindfulness Scale. Serial mediation analysis revealed that the indirect pathway from mindful observation to PEB via biospheric values and personal norms was significant (β = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.27, 0.39]). This shows that mindful observation enhanced biospheric values, which, in turn, influenced personal norms to foster PEB. Also, this suggests that mindful observation is a potential antecedent to biospheric values, highlighting the importance of cultivating mindfulness and instilling biospheric values among Indian adolescents to strengthen their personal norms towards PEB.
AmelE. L., ManningC. M., & ScottB. A. (2009). Mindfulness and sustainable behaviour: Pondering attention and awareness as means for increasing green behavior. Ecopsychology, 1(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2008.0005
2.
BaerR. A., SmithG. T., HopkinsJ., KrietemeyerJ., & ToneyL. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504.
3.
BaerR. A., SmithG. T., LykinsE., ButtonD., KrietmeyerJ., SauerS., WalshE., DugganD., & WilliamsJ. M. G. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in mediating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107313003
4.
BalundėA., PerlaviciuteG., & Truskauskaitė-KunevičienėI. (2020). Sustainability in youth: Environmental considerations in adolescence and their relationship to pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 582920. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582920
5.
BarbaroN., & PickettS. M. (2016). Mindfully green: Examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.026
6.
BarrettB., GrabowM., MiddlecampC., MooneyM., ChecovichM. M., ConverseA. K., GillespieB., & YatesJ. (2016). Mindful climate action: Health and environmental co-benefits from mindfulness-based behavioral training. Sustainability, 8(10), 1040. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101040
7.
BordenR. J. (1977). One more look at social and environmental psychology: Away from the looking glass and into the future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(3), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727700300309
8.
BronfenbrennerU., & MorrisP. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In LernerR. M. & DamonW. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114
9.
BrownK. W., & KasserT. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8
10.
BrownK. W., & RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2003-02410-012
11.
ChatzisarantisN. L. D., & HaggerM. S. (2007). Mindfulness and the intention-behavior relationship within the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206297401
12.
ColladoS., StaatsH., & SanchoP. (2019). Normative influences on adolescents’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of parents and friends. Environment and Behavior, 51(3), 288–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517744591
13.
ColomboS. L., ChiarellaS. G., RaffoneA., & SimioneL. (2023). Understanding the environmental attitude-behaviour gap: The moderating role of dispositional mindfulness. Sustainability, 15(9), 7285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097285
14.
DaireH., JosephC., & MichaelR. M. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254742561_
15.
De GrootJ. I. M., & StegL. (2007). Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107300278
16.
DoranR., & LarsenS. (2016). The relative importance of social and personal norms in explaining intentions to choose ecofriendly travel options. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2042
17.
DroutmanV., GolubI., OganesyanA., & ReadS. (2018). Development and initial validation of the adolescent and adult mindfulness scale (AAMS). Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.037
EsfandiarK., DowlingR., PearceJ., & GohE. (2019). Personal norms and the adoption of pro-environmental binning behaviour in national parks: an integrated structural model approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1663203
20.
FritzscheD., & OzE. (2007). Personal values’ influence on the ethical dimension of decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9256-5
21.
GeigerS. M., FischerD., SchraderU., & GrossmanP. (2020). Meditating for the planet: Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on sustainable consumption behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 52(9), 1012–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916519880897
22.
GeigerS. M., GrossmanP., & SchraderU. (2019). Mindfulness and sustainability: Correlation or causation?Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.09.010
23.
GeigerS. M., OttoS., & SchraderU. (2018). Mindfully green and healthy: An indirect path from mindfulness to ecological behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2306. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02306
24.
GiffordR., & NilssonA. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
25.
GrønhøjA., & ThøgersenJ. (2009). Like father, like son? Intergenerational transmission of values, attitudes, and behaviours in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.002
26.
HairJ. F.Jr., AndersonR. E., TathamR. L., & BlackW. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
27.
HairJ. F., AndersonR. E., TathamR. L., BlackW. C., & BabinB. J. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
28.
HanH., & AhnS. W. (2020). Youth mobilization to stop global climate change: Narratives and impact. Sustainability, 12, 4127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104127
29.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
30.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
31.
HuneckeM., & RichterN. (2019). Mindfulness, construction of meaning, and sustainable food consumption. Mindfulness, 10(3), 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0986-0
32.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Summary for policymakers. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
33.
Kabat-ZinnJ. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your mind to face stress, pain and illness. Dell Publishing.
34.
KallgrenC. A., RenoR. R., & CialdiniR. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 1002–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002610009
35.
KaurT., & LuchsM. G. (2022). Mindfulness enhances the values that promote sustainable consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 990–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21636
36.
KimH. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38, 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
37.
KirkV., FatolaC., & RomeroM. (2016). Systematic review of mindfulness induced neuroplasticity in adults: Potential areas of interest for the maturing adolescent brain. Journal of Childhood & Developmental Disorders, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1786.100016
38.
KrettenauerT. (2017). Pro-environmental behavior and adolescent moral development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(3), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12300
39.
KrettenauerT., WangW., JiaF., & YaoY. (2019). Connectedness with nature and the decline of pro-environmental behavior in adolescence: A comparison of Canada and China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101348
40.
KumarS., PandaT., & PandeyK. (2022). The effect of employee’s mindfulness on voluntary pro-environment behaviour at the workplace: The mediating role of connectedness to nature. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29, 3356-3378. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2021-0237
41.
LarsonL. R., StedmanR. C., CooperC. B., & DeckerD. J. (2015). Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.004
42.
MatthiesE., SelgeS., & KlöcknerC. A. (2012). The role of parental behaviour for the development of behaviour specific environmental norms: The example of recycling and re-use behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.003
43.
MilfontT. L., DuckittJ., & CameronL. D. (2006). A cross-cultural study of environmental motive concerns and their implications for pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 38(6), 745–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505285933
44.
Ministry of Human Resource Development (2020). National education policy 2020. Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
45.
MoshmanD. (2005). Adolescent psychological development: Rationality, morality, and identity (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
46.
NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & GrandpierreZ. (2019). Mindfulness in nature enhances connectedness and mood. Ecopsychology, 11(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0061
47.
OjalaM. (2016). Young people and global climate change: Emotions, coping, and engagement in everyday life. Geographies of Global Issues: Change and Threat, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-54-5_3
48.
OttoS., & KaiserF. G. (2014). Ecological behavior across the lifespan: Why environmentalism increases as people grow older. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.08.004
49.
PinhoA. D. S., MollemanL., BraamsB. R., & van den BosW. (2021). Majority and popularity effects on norm formation in adolescence. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12884. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92482-8
50.
RuepertA., KeizerK., & StegL. (2017). The relationship between Corporate Environmental Responsibility, employees’ biospheric values and pro-environmental behaviour at work. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2017.10.006
51.
SchultzP. W., GouveiaV. V., CameronL. D., TankhaG., SchmuckP., & FraněkM. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275962
52.
SchwartzS. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
53.
SchwartzS. H. (2012a). Values and religion in adolescent development: Cross-national and comparative evidence. In TrommsdorffG. & ChenX. (Eds.), Values, religion, and culture in adolescent development (pp. 97–122). Cambridge University Press.
54.
SchwartzS. H. (2012b). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
55.
SethiV., LahiriA., BhanotA., KumarA., ChopraM., MishraR., AlambushaR., AgrawalP., JohnstonR., & de WagtA. (2019). Adolescents, diets and nutrition: Growing well in a changing world. The Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey, Thematic Reports, (1), 1–4. https://www.unicef.org/india/media/2631/file/CNNS-Thematic-Report-Adolescents-Diets-and-Nutrition.pdf
56.
ShanmathiV. S., & VinothkumarM. (2023). From mindful observation to pro-environmental behaviour: The mediating role of connectedness facet of awe emotion. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 12, 140–149. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377158239_
57.
ShiJ., MoX., & SunZ. (2012). Content validity index in scale development. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 37(2), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007
58.
SinghP., SahadevS., OatesC. J., & AlevizouP. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior in families: A reverse socialization perspective. Journal of Business Research, 115, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.047
59.
StegL., De GrootJ. I., DreijerinkL., AbrahamseW., & SieroF. (2011). General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: The role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Society and Natural Resources, 24(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903214116
60.
StegL., DreijerinkL., & AbrahamseW. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
61.
StegL., & VlekC. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
62.
SternP. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
63.
SternP. C., DietzT., AbelT., GuagnanoG. A., & KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97. https://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her62/62sternetal.pdf
64.
UittoA., Boeve-de PauwJ., & SalorantaS. (2015). Participatory school experiences as facilitators for adolescents’ ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.007
65.
Van GordonW., ShoninE., & RichardsonM. (2018). Mindfulness and nature. Mindfulness, 9(5), 1655–1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0883-6
66.
VecchioneM., SchwartzS. H., DavidovE., CieciuchJ., AlessandriG., & MarsicanoG. (2020). Stability and change of basic personal values in early adolescence: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 88(3), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12502
67.
WallisH., & KlöcknerC. (2020). The transmission of energy-saving behaviors in the family: A multilevel approach to the assessment of aggregated and single energy-saving actions of parents and adolescents. Environment and Behavior, 52(3), 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518802342
68.
WangX., Van der WerffE., BoumanT., HarderM. K., & StegL. (2021). I am vs. we are: How biospheric values and environmental identity of individuals and groups can influence pro-environmental behaviour. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 618956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618956
69.
World Health Organization. (2020). WHOQOL: Measuring quality of life. FINNERTY, Anthony: Translation methodology. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/publishing-policies/whoqol-100-guidelines/translation-methodology.pdf?sfvrsn=74cdb8f5_2
70.
WigfieldA., ByrnesJ. P., & EcclesJ. S. (2006). Development during early and middle adolescence. In AlexanderP. A. & WinneP. H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 87–113). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
71.
WilloxA. C., HarperS. L., EdgeV. L., LandmanK., HouleK., & FordJ. D. (2013). The land enriches the soul: On climatic and environmental change, affect, and emotional health and well-being in Rigolet, Nunatsiavut, Canada. Emotion, Space and Society, 6, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2011.08.005
72.
WilloxA. C., HarperS. L., FordJ. D., EdgeV. L., LandmanK., HouleK., BlakeS. & WolfreyC. (2013). Climate change and mental health: An exploratory case study from Rigolet, Nunatsiavut, Canada. Climatic Change, 121(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0875-4
73.
Wray-LakeL., FlanaganC. A., & OsgoodD. W. (2010). Examining trends in adolescent environmental attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors across three decades. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509335163
74.
YounanL., ClintonM., FaresS., SamahaH. (2019). The translation and cultural adaptation validity of the actual scope of practice questionnaire. East Mediterranean Health Journal, 25(3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.18.028
