Marginality is a widely used concept in the literature on inequality and development. It has gained momentum, especially in the context of rising inequality in the post-liberalised and globalised world. This article looks into the evolution of marginality, analyses its role in the developmental discourse and argues that the interrelation between objective and subjective aspects of marginality constitutes the idea of it. This discussion identifies marginality as a measure of inequality in a given social context and time and indicates the degree of inequality experienced by individuals or groups. The article is divided into four parts. The first part looks into the change in meaning and components of marginality. The second part discusses marginality with other closely related concepts such as exclusion, poverty, the culture of poverty and precarity. The third part engages with the constituents of the marginal situation, and the fourth part discusses different typologies available to understand the dimensions of marginality.
AdatoM., & HoddinottJ. (2010). Conditional cash transfers in Latin America. Johns Hopkins University Press (for the International Food Policy Research Institute).
2.
AllisonA. (2013). Precarious Japan. Duke University Press.
3.
AntonovskyA. (1956). Toward a refinement of the “marginal man” concept. Social Forces, 35(1), 57–62. 10.2307/2573115
4.
ArnoldD., & BongioviJ. R. (2013). Precarious, informalizing, and flexible work: Transforming concepts and understandings. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(3), 289–308. 10.1177%2F0002764212466239
5.
BanerjeeA., & DufloE. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. Public Affairs.
6.
BanerjeeA., DufloE., GhatakM., & LafortuneJ. (2013). Marry for what? Caste and mate selection in modern India. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(2), 33–72. 10.1257/mic.5.2.33
7.
BankovskayaS. (2014). Living in-between: The uses of marginality in sociological theory. Russian Sociological Review, 13(4). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2761324
8.
BaruR., AcharyaA., AcharyaS., Shiva KumarA. K., & NagarajK. (2010). Inequities in access to health services in India: Caste, class and region. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(38), 49–58. https://www.epw.in/journal/2010/38/special-articles/inequities-access-health-services-india-caste-class-and-region.html
9.
BillsonJ. M. (2005). No owner of soil: Redefining the concept of marginality. In RutledgeM. D. (Ed.), Marginality, power, and social structure: Issues in race, class, and gender analysis (pp. 29–47). Elsevier.
10.
BourdieuP. (1972). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
11.
Brann-BarrettM. T. (2011). Same landscape, different lens: Variations in young people’s socio-economic experiences and perceptions in their disadvantaged working-class community. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(3), 261–278. 10.1080/13676261.2010.532328
12.
ButlerJ. (2006). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
13.
ChakravartiU. (1998). Rewriting history: The life and times of Pandita Ramabai. Kali for Women.
14.
DesaiI. P. (1979). The concept of desired type of society and the problems of social change. Sociological Bulletin, 28(1–2), 1–8. 10.1177%2F0038022919790101
15.
DickersonA., & PopliG. K. (2012). Persistent poverty and children’s cognitive development: Evidence from the U.K. Millennium cohort study (Working Paper No. 2). Centre for Longitudinal Studies. https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CLS-WP-20122.pdf
16.
Dickie-ClarkH. F. (1966). The marginal situation: A contribution to marginality theory. Social Forces, 44(3), 363–370. 10.1093/sf/44.3.363
17.
DronkersJ., Van Der VeldenR., & DunneA. (2012). Why are migrant students better off in certain types of educational systems or schools than in others?European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 11–44. 10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.11
18.
D’souzaV. S. (1979). Socio-cultural marginality: A theory of urban slums and poverty in India. Sociological Bulletin, 28(1–2), 9–24. 10.1177/0038022919790102
19.
DunneR. J. (2005). Marginality: A conceptual extension. In RutledgeM. D. (Ed.), Marginality, power, and social structure: Issues in race, class, and gender analysis (pp. 11–27). Elsevier.
20.
GatzweilerF. W., BaumüllerH., LadenburgerC., & von BraunJ. (2011). Marginality: Addressing the root causes of extreme poverty (ZEF Working Paper Series no. 77). Centre for Development Research, University of Bonn. https://www.zef.de/fileadmin/webfiles/downloads/zef_wp/wp77.pdf
21.
GermaniG. (1980). Marginality. Transaction Books.
22.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press.
23.
GistN. P. (1967). Cultural versus social marginality: The Anglo-Indian case. Phylon, 28(4), 361–375. 10.2307/274288
24.
GolovenskyD. (1952). The marginal man concept: An analysis and critique. Social Forces, 30(3), 333–339. 10.2307/2571600
25.
GordonM. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion, and national origins. Oxford University Press.
26.
GrantG. K., & BreeseJ. R. (1997). Marginality theory and the African American student. Sociology of Education, 70(3), 192–205. 10.2307/2673208
27.
GreenA. W. (1947). A re-examination of the marginal man concept. Social Forces, 26(2), 167–171. 10.2307/2571773
28.
GrewalD. S. (2008). Network power: The social dynamics of globalization. Yale University Press.
29.
HewisonK. (2016). Precarious work. In EdgellS., GottfriedH., & GrantnerE. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of the sociology of work and employment (pp. 428–443). SAGE.
30.
HickeyS., & du ToitA. (2007). Adverse incorporation, social exclusion and chronic poverty (CPRC Working Paper No. 81). Chronic Poverty Research Centre. http://www.chronicpoverty.org/uploads/publication_files/WP81_Hickey_duToit.pdf
31.
HuberJ. (1997). Rational choice models in sociology. The American Sociologist, 28(2), 42–53. 10.1007/s12108-997-1005-4
32.
IlaiahK. (1996). Why I am not a Hindu: A sudra critique of Hindutva philosophy, culture and political economy. Samya.
33.
JeffreyC., JefferyP., & JefferyR. (2008). Degrees without freedom? Education, masculinities and unemployment in North India. Stanford University Press.
34.
JenkinsT. H. (2005). The marginal man: Evolution of a concept. In RutledgeM. D. (Ed.), Marginality, power, and social structure: Issues in race, class, and gender analysis (pp. 49–67). Elsevier.
35.
JoseS. (2011). Adult undernutrition in India: Is there a huge gender gap?Economic and Political Weekly, 46(29), 95–102. https://www.epw.in/journal/2011/29/special-articles/adult-undernutrition-india-there-huge-gender-gap.html
36.
JudgeP. S. (2015). Caste hierarchy, dominance, and change in Punjab. Sociological Bulletin, 64(1), 55–76. 10.1177/0038022920150104
37.
KerckhoffA. C., & McCormickT. C. (1955). Marginal status and marginal personality. Social Forces, 34(1), 48–55. 10.2307/2574259
38.
LaitinD. D. (1995). Marginality: A microperspective. Rationality and Society, 7(1), 31–57. 10.1177/1043463195007001003
39.
LeimgruberW. (2004). Between global and local: Marginality and marginal regions in the context of globalization and deregulation. Routledge.
40.
LevineD. N. (1977). Simmel at a distance: On the history and systematics of the sociology of the stranger. Sociological Focus, 10(1), 15–29. 10.1080/00380237.1977.10570274
41.
LevitasR., PantazisC., FahmyE., GordonD., LloydE., & PatsiosD. (2007). The multi-dimensional analysis of social exclusion. Department for Communities and Local, Government (DCLG). https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6853/1/multidimensional.pdf
42.
LewinK. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. Harper & Row.
43.
LewisO. (1961). The children of Sanchez. Penguin Books.
44.
MadanipourA., CarsG., & AllenJ. (1998). Social exclusion in European cities: Processes, experiences, and responses. Jessica Kingsley.
45.
MannJ. W. (1958). Group relations and the marginal personality. Human Relations, 11(1), 77–92. 10.1177/001872675801100106
46.
MehretuA., PigozziB. Wm., & SommersL. M. (2000). Concepts in social and spatial marginality. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 82(2), 89–101. 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2000.00076.x
47.
MukerjiD. P. (2004). Personality and the social sciences. Rupa & Co.
48.
NelkinD. (1969). A response to marginality: The case of migrant farmworkers. The British Journal of Sociology, 20(4), 375–389. 10.2307/588923
49.
NussbaumM. (2004). Emotions as judgments of value and importance. In SolomonR. (Ed.), Thinking about feelings: Contemporary philosophers on emotions (pp. 183–199). Oxford University Press.
50.
NussbaumM., & SenA. (1993). Introduction. In NussbaumM. & SenA. (Eds.), The quality of life. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0198287976.001.0001
51.
ParkR. E. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. American Journal of Sociology, 33(6), 881–893. https://www-jstor-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/2765982
52.
PayneR. K., DeVolP. E., & SmithT. D. (2006). Bridges out of poverty: Strategies for professionals and communities. Aha! Process, Inc.
53.
PrestonL. M. (1995). Theorising differences: Voices from the margins. American Political Science Review, 89(4), 941–953. 10.2307/2082519
54.
RazerM., FriedmanV. J., & WarshofskyB. (2013). Schools as agents of social exclusion and inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(11), 1152–1170. 10.1080/13603116.2012.742145
55.
RuddleK., & RondinelliD. A. (1983). Transforming natural resources for human development: A resource systems framework for development policy (Resource Systems Theory and Methodology Series). United Nations University Press. https://archive.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/80469e/80469E00.htm
56.
SaberwalS. (1972). Education and inequality: An essay in political sociology. Economic and Political Weekly, 7, 409–412. https://www.epw.in/journal/1972/5-6-7/growth-experience-specials/education-and-inequality-essay-political-sociology
SenG., IyerA., & MukherjeeC. (2009). A methodology to analyse the intersections of social inequalities in health. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(3), 397–415. 10.1080/19452820903048894
59.
SercombeH., & DonnellyB. (2013). Bullying and agency: Definition, intervention and ethics. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(4), 491–502. 10.1080/13676261.2012.725834
60.
ShilsE. (1975). Center and periphery. University of Chicago Press.
61.
ShotterJ. (1989). Rhetoric and the recovery of civil society. Economic and Society, 18(2), 149–166. 10.1080/03085148900000008
62.
ShotterJ. (2004). The manufacture of personhood, and the institutionalization of mutual humiliation. Concepts and Transformation, 9(1), 1–37.
63.
SimeD., FoxR., & PietkaE. (2010). At home abroad: The life experiences of children of migrant workers in Scotland (Report). University of Strathclyde. https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/36531
64.
SimmelG. (1971). The stranger. In LevineD. (Ed.), Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms (pp. 143–150). University of Chicago Press.
65.
SleeR. (2013). The labelling and categorisation of children with emotional and behavioural difficulties: A cautionary consideration. In ColeT., DanielsH., & VisserJ. (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to emotional and behavioural difficulties (1st Ed., pp. 15–21). Routledge.
66.
SmithR., & BarrS. (2008). Towards education inclusion in a contested society: From critical analysis to creative action. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(4), 401–422. 10.1080/13603110601145775
67.
StandingG. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Publishing.
68.
StandingG. (2013). Defining the precariat: A class in the making. Eurozine. https://www.eurozine.com/defining-the-precariat/
69.
StandingG. (2014). Understanding the precariat through labour and work. Development and Change, 45(5), 963–980. 10.1111/dech.12120
70.
StonequistE. V. (1937). The marginal man: A study in personality and culture conflict. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
71.
TaylorY. (2010). Brushed behind the bike shed: Working-class lesbians’ experiences of school. In RixJ., NindM., SheehyK., SimmonsK., & WalshC. (Eds.), Equality, participation and inclusion 1: Diverse perspectives (2nd Ed., pp. 286–294). Routledge.
72.
VasaviA. R. (2010). Caste indignities and subjective personhoods. In ThoratS. & KumarN. (Eds.), In search of inclusive policy: Addressing graded inequality (pp. 51–66). Rawat Publications.
73.
von BraunJ., & GatzweilerF. W. (2014). Marginality—An overview and implications for policy. In von BraunJ. & GatzweilerF. W. (Eds.), Marginality: Addressing the nexus of poverty, exclusion and ecology (pp. 1–23). Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-7061-4
74.
WacquantL. (2016). Revisiting territories of relegation: Class, ethnicity and state in the making of advanced marginality. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1077–1088. 10.1177/0042098015613259
75.
WacquantL. J. D. (1996). The rise of advanced marginality: Notes on its nature and implications. Acta Sociologica, 39(2), 121–139. 10.1177/000169939603900201
76.
WalkerA., & WalkerC. (1997). Divided Britain: The growth of social exclusion in the 1980s and 1990s. Child Poverty Action Group.
77.
WeisbergerA. (1992). Marginality and its directions. Sociological Forum, 7(3), 425–446. 10.1007/BF01117555
