Non-financial reporting, mainly called environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures, depicts the future corporate plan apart from current corporate actions and is getting substantial attention amongst the corporate world, policymakers, and academics. ESG disclosures indicate how companies can address environmental and social challenges, setting a high standard of governance mechanism. Due to increased ESG awareness, stakeholders expect companies to engage in sustainable practices that could even exceed the mandatory disclosure requirements. Such pressure has compelled companies worldwide to improve their ESG disclosures. ESG rating providers attempt to measure companies’ ESG performance against the benchmark, focusing on the influence of ESG disclosures on financial performance. Although the composite ESG scores have a broader preference in assessing the companies’ comparative performance, those scores are unlikely to depict their real impacts on the stakeholders. Considering the inherent limitations of the composite ESG scores, the present qualitative study motivates the exploration of whether component-wise ESG scores could better address the limitations of the composite ESG scores.
AguileraR. V., Aragón-CorreaJ. A., MaranoV., & TashmanP. A. (2021). The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1468–1497.
2.
Al AmoshH. A. (2021). The role of governance attributes in corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices evidence from Jordan. In AlqatanA., HussaineyK., and KhlifH. (Eds), Corporate governance and its implications on accounting and finance (pp. 255–279). IGI Global.
3.
AldowaishA., KokuryoJ., AlmazyadO., & GoiH. C. (2024). How to manage conflicts in the process of ESG integration? A case of a Japanese firm. Sustainability, 16(8), 3391.
4.
AroraP., & DharwadkarR. (2011). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization slack. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2), 136–152.
5.
BearS., RahmanN., & PostC. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221.
6.
BergF., KölbelJ. F., & RigobonR. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344.
7.
BolourianS., AngusA., & AlinaghianL. (2021). The impact of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility at the board-level: A critical assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125752.
8.
CardilloG., & ChiappiniH. (2022). The credit risk of sustainable firms during the pandemic. Global Business Review, 23(6), 1462–1480.
9.
ChatterjiA. K., LevineD. I., & ToffelM. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility?Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125–169.
10.
ChelawatC. A., & TrivediI. V. (2015). Does ESG investment enhance investment returns?Business Review. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2889379
11.
ChristensenH. B., HailL., & LeuzC. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248.
12.
CortT., & EstyD. (2020). ESG standards: Looming challenges and pathways forward. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 491–510.
13.
CraceL., & GehmanJ. (2023). What really explains ESG performance? Disentangling the asymmetrical drivers of the triple bottom line. Organization & Environment, 36(1) 150–178.
14.
DeckelbaumA. (2020). ESG disclosures: Frameworks and standards developed by intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations. The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/09/21/esg-disclosures-frameworks-and-standards-developed-by-intergovernmental-and-nongovernmental-organizations/
15.
DiamondD. W., & VerrecchiaR. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325–1359.
16.
DowlingJ., & PfefferJ. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.
17.
EcclesR. G., LeeL.-E., & StroehleJ. C. (2020). The social origins of ESG: An analysis of Innovest and KLD. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 575–596.
18.
EndenichC., HahnR., ReimsbachD., & WickertC. (2023). Wait-and-see-ism as partial adoption of management practices: The rise and stall of integrated reporting. Strategic Organization. 10.1177/14761270221078605
19.
FrancisJ., NandaD., & OlssonP. (2008). Voluntary disclosure, earnings quality, and cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1), 53–99.
20.
FreemanR. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Prentice-Hall.
21.
Fuente de laG., & VelascoP. (2024). Pretending to be sustainable: Is ESG disparity a symptom?Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 20(2), 100418.
22.
Garcia-ToreaN., LarrinagaC., & Luque-VílchezM. (2023). Bridging the understanding of sustainability accounting and organizational change. Organization & Environment, 36(1), 17–38.
23.
Howard-GrenvilleJ. (2021). ESG impact is hard to measure—but it’s not impossible. Harvard Business Review. http://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/317097
24.
HummelK., & SchlickC. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure: Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455–476.
25.
ImbrogianoJ. P. (2021). Contingency in business sustainability research and in the sustainability service industry: A problematization and research agenda. Organization & Environment, 34(2), 298–322.
26.
JensenM. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.
27.
KaurA., & LodhiaS. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability accounting and reporting: A study of Australian local councils. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 338–368.
28.
KumarP. C. (2020). ESG compliant companies provide superior returns. https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2020/02/29/esg-compliant-companies-provide-superior-returns
29.
KumawatR., & PatelN. (2022). Are ESG disclosures value relevant? A panel-corrected standard error (PCSE) approach. Global Business Review, 23(6), 1558–1573.
30.
LeeM. T., RaschkeR. L., & KrishenA. S. (2023). Understanding ESG scores and firm performance: Are high-performing firms E, S, and G-balanced?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 195, 122779.
31.
MairaA. (2022, March3). Going beyond shareholder wealth. The Business Line, p. 5. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/going-beyond-shareholder-wealth/article65248715.ece
32.
MulchandaniK., MulchandaniK., IyerG., & LonareA. (2022). Do equity investors care about environment, social and governance (ESG) disclosure performance? Evidence from India. Global Business Review, 23(6), 1336–1352.
33.
NagT., & BhattacharyyaA. K. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting in India: Exploring linkages with firm performance. Global Business Review, 17(6), 1427–1440.
34.
ParekhS. (2023, April18). A framework for ESG raters. The Financial Express, p. 8. https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/a-framework-for-esg-rater/3051191
35.
PattenD., & ShinH. (2019). Sustainability accounting, management and policy journal’s contributions to sustainability disclosure research: A review and assessment. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(1), 26–40.
36.
RaimoN., CaragnanoA., ZitoM., VitollaF., & MarianiM. (2021). Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure: The effect on the cost of debt financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1412–1421.
37.
ReberB., GoldA., & GoldS. (2022). ESG disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in Initial public offerings. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(3), 867–886.
38.
ReimsbachD., SchiemannF., HahnR., & SchmiedchenE. (2020). In the eyes of the beholder: Experimental evidence on the contested nature of materiality in sustainability reporting. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 624–651.
39.
RezaeeZ., & TuoL. (2019). Are the quantity and quality of sustainability disclosures associated with the innate and discretionary earnings quality?Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), 763–786.
40.
SabnavisM. (2022, August12). Is ESG being reduced to an eyewash?The Business Line, p. 5. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/is-esg-being-reduced-to-an-eyewash/article65758839.ece
41.
SabnavisM. (2023, November11). Evaluate E, S and G separately. The Financial Express, p. 8. https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/the-three-are-widely-varying-aspects-of-corporate-functioning-and-therefore-assessing-them-together-is-quite-problematic/3318404
42.
SharmaR., SinhaA., & KautishP. (2021). Do economic endeavors complement sustainability goals in the emerging economies of South and Southeast Asia?Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(3), 524–542.
43.
SinghI. (2023, May16). Digital leap for ESG reporting. The Financial Express, p. 6. https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/digital-leap-for-esg-reporting/3088933
44.
SridharanS. (2022, March1). GREED is good for ESG. The Financial Express, p. 6. https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/greed-is-good-for-esg/2447234
45.
VerrecchiaR. E. (1983). Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 179–194.
46.
WernickeG., SajkoM., & BooneC. (2021). How much influence do CEOs have on company actions and outcomes? The example of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Discoveries, 8(1), 36–55. 10.5465/amd.2019.0074
47.
ZamanR., JainT., SamaraG., & JamaliD. (2022). Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: Mapping the interface. Business & Society, 61(3), 690–752.
48.
ZhangJ. Q., ZhuH., & DingH. (2013). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 381–392.
49.
ZhangR., SharmaR., TanZ., & KautishP. (2022). Do export diversification and stock market development drive carbon intensity? The role of renewable energy solutions in top carbon emitter countries. Renewable Energy, 185, 1318–1328.
