Can South–South Trade Agreements Reduce Development Deficits?

Abstract

With the rise of India and other Southern engines of growth, the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and similar vehicles for South–South regional cooperation have gained in importance. Developing a stochastic frontier gravity model, this article investigates the presence of significant ‘behind the border’ and ‘beyond the border’ constraints and analyzes the potential synergy between trade and development goals in the context of SAARC. In particular, the article demonstrates: (a) a considerable potential for improvement of trade complementarities among SAARC members; (b) a long-run scope for gains from trade; (c) country-specific ‘socio-political–economical–institutional’ rigidities form ‘behind the border’ constraints to trade; (d) that realization of trade potential would eliminate development deficits via growth dividends through trade and investment spillovers, exchange of skills and knowledge; and (e) since tariffs are not an important barrier in this region, emphasis should be placed on higher technology cooperation, and cooperation in areas of education, literacy, gender, institutions ensuring good governance, social capital and infrastructure, to help achieve the SAARC Development Goals (SDGs). The main policy insights are that the removal of ‘behind the border’ barriers and policy coordination would reduce ‘productivity lags’ and close the ‘gap’.

Keywords

Stochastic frontier gravity model trade inclusive growth and development SAARC FTA/PTA

References

Acharya

Holscher

Perugini

(2012). Trade liberalization and inequalities in Nepal: A CGE analysis. Economic Modelling, 29(6), 2543–2557.

Aigner

Lovell

K.C.A.

Schmidt

(1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37.

Anderson

James E.

(1979, March). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.

Anderson

J.E.

van Wincoop

(2003, March). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.

Anderson

J.E.

van Wincoop

(2004, September). Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 691–751.

Armstrong

Shiro

. (2007). Measuring trade and trade potential: A survey. Asia Pacific Economic Papers No. 368, Australia–Japan Research Centre, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, Crawford School of Economics and Government, the Australian National University, Canberra, pp. 1–17.

Arora

Vamvakidis

(2004, February). How much do trading partners matter for economic growth? IMF Working Paper WP/04/26, Washington, DC.

Baldwin

(1994). Towards an integrated Europe. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

Arora

Vamvakidis

(1995). A domino theory of regionalism. In Baldwin

Richard

Haaparanta

Pentti

Klander

Jaakko

(eds), Expanding membership of the European Union (pp. 25–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Barro

Sala-i-Martin

(1995). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.

11.

Bergstrand

J.H.

(1985). The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474–481.

12.

Bergstrand

J.H.

(1989). The generalised gravity equation, monopolistic competition and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143–153.

13.

Bhagwati

Panagariya

(1999). Preferential trading areas and multilateralism : Strangers, friends, or foes? In Bhagwati

Krishna

Panagariya

(eds), Trading Blocs: Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Preferential Trade Agreements (pp. 33–96). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

14.

Brooks

Douglas H.

Menon

Jayant

(eds). (2008). Infrastructure and trade in Asia. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar and Asian Development Bank Institute.

15.

Chandran

B.P. Sarath

. (2013, December). Composition, direction and intra-regional trade among SAARC countries—An analysis. International Journal of Economics, Commerce, and Research (IJECR), 3(5), 33–40.

16.

Chen

De Lombaerde

(2013). Testing the relationships between globalization, regionalization and the regional hubness of the BRICs. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36(1), S111–S131.

17.

Chowdhury

(2004, June). Convergence of per capita GDP across SAARC countries. Working Paper 04-07, Department of Economics, University of Wollongong.

18.

Coelli

(1996). A guide to FRONTIER version 4.1: A Computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis Working Paper 97/07, University or New England, Armidale.

19.

Das

Gouranga G.

(2007, December). Who leads and who lags? Technology diffusion, e-commerce and trade facilitation in a model of northern hub vis-à-vis southern spokes. Journal of Economic Integration, 22(4), 929–972.

20.

Das

Gouranga G.

(2012, May). Globalization, socio-institutional factors and north–south knowledge diffusion: Role of India and China as southern growth progenitors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(4), 620–637.

21.

Dasgupta

(2009, June). A matter of trust: Social capital and economic development. Paper presented at Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Seoul.

22.

Prabir.

(2014, July 12). WTO trade facilitation agreement: Concerns and issues. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(28), 15–18.

23.

Deluna

Roperto

Jr. (2013, April). Trade performance and potential of the Philippines: An application of stochastic frontier gravity model. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper 51677, pp. 1–37.

24.

Dhar

Panagariya

(1996, July 15–17). Is East Asia less open than North America and the EEC? No. Paper presented at the International Economics Association Round Table Conference in International Trade Policy and the Pacific Rim, Sydney.

25.

Drysdale

Garnaut

(1982). Trade intensities and the analysis of bilateral trade flows in a many-country world: A survey. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 22(2), 62–84.

26.

Drysdale

P.D.

Huang

Kalirajan

(2000). China’s trade efficiency: Measurement and determinants. In Drysdale

Zhang

Song

(eds), APEC and liberalisation of the Chinese economy. Canberra: Asia Pacific Press.

27.

Egger

Peter

. (2000). A note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation. Economic Letters, 66(1), 25–31.

28.

Elizondo

R.L.

Krugman

(1992). Trade policy and third world metropolis. NBER Working Paper No. 4238, National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, DC.

29.

Estevaleordal

(2006, February 9–10). The rise of regionalism. Paper presented in the conference, ‘The New Regionalism: Progress, Setbacks and Challenges’, held at the Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC.

30.

Frankel

J.A.

(1993). Is Japan creating a yen bloc in the East Asia and the Pacific? In Frankel

J.A.

Kahler

(eds), Regionalism and rivalry: Japan and the United States in Pacific Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

31.

Fugazza

Robert-Nicoud

(2006). Can South-South trade liberalization stimulate North-South trade? Journal of Economic Integration, 21(2), 234–253.

32.

Gawande

Krishna

(2001). The political economy of trade policy: Empirical approaches. Working Papers, Economics Department, Brown University, Providence, RI.

33.

Iapadre

P.L.

Tajoli

(2013). Emerging countries and trade regionalization. A network analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36(1), S89–S110.

34.

Independent South Asian Commission on Poverty Alleviation (ISACPA). (2004). SAARC development goals: An engagement with hope. Retrieved 25 July 2014, from Royal Government of Bhutan: http://www.gnhc.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/SDGs.pdf

35.

Jayanthakumaran

Lee

(2009). Income convergence of the SAARC-5 countries. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 8(2), 367–386.

36.

Kalirajan

(1999). Stochastic varying coefficients gravity model: An application in trade analysis. Journal of Applied Statistics, 26(8), 185–194.

37.

Kalirajan

(2007). Regional cooperation and bilateral trade flows: An empirical measurement of resistance. The International Trade Journal, XXI(2), 85–107.

38.

Kalirajan

K.P.

Bhattacharya

S.K.

(2008). Free trade arrangement between India and Japan: An exploratory analysis. In Jha

Raghavendra

(ed.), The Indian economy sixty years after independence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

39.

Kawai

Masahiro.

(2005, February). East Asian economic regionalism: Progress and challenges. Journal of Asian Economies, 16(1), 29–55.

40.

Kumar

A. G.

Saini

G. K.

(2009). Economic cooperation in South Asia: The dilemma of SAFTA and beyond. Journal of South Asian Development, 4(2), 253–281.

41.

Kumbhakar

Subal C.

Lovell

C.A. Knox

. (2003). Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

42.

Lee

Kap-Yeong

Chae

(2011). Measuring social capital in East Asia and other world regions: Index of social capital for 72 countries. Global Economic Review, 40(4), 385–407.

43.

Levchenko

Andrei A.

(2004). Institutional quality & international trade. IMF Working Paper No. WP/04/23, Washington, DC.

44.

Meeusen

William

van den Broeck

Julian

. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production function with composed error. International Economic Review, 18, 435–444.

45.

Moinuddin

Mustafa.

(2013, April). Fulfilling the promises of South Asian integration: A gravity estimation. ADBI Working Paper Series No. 415, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan. Retrieved 17 July 2014, from http://www.adbi.org/working-paper/2013/04/05/5596.promises.south.asian.integration/

46.

Muni

S.D.

Jetly

(2008). SAARC: The changing dimension. UNU-CRIS Working Paper W-2008/8, pp. 1–27.

47.

Nasir

Shahbaz

Kalirajan

Kaliappa

. (2013). Export performance of South and East Asia in modern services. ASARC Working Paper 2013/07, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University.

48.

Newfarmer

Nowak

D.A.

(2005). The World Bank in trade: The new trade agenda. In Newfarmer

Richard

(ed.), Trade, Doha, and development: A window into the issues (pp. 375–386). Washington, DC: World Bank.

49.

Nilsson

(2000). Trade integration and the EU economic membership criteria. European Journal of Political Economy, 16(4), 807–827.

50.

Panagarya

Arvind

. (1997). Preferential trading and the myth of natural trading partners. Japan and the World Economy, 9(4), 471–489.

51.

Panagarya

Arvind

. (2000). Preferential trade liberalization: The traditional theory and new developments. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(2), 287–331.

52.

Pigato

Farah

Itakura

Jun

Martin

Murrell

Srinivasan

T.G.

(1997). South Asia’s integration into the world economy. Washington, DC: World Bank.

53.

Plummer

(2007). Best practices in regional trading agreement: An application to Asia. The World Economy, 30(12), 1771–1796.

54.

Ravishankar

Geetha

Stack

Marie M.

(2013, December). The gravity model and trade efficiency: A stochastic frontier analysis of potential trade. Discussion Papers in Economics, Nottingham Trent University, pp. 1–32.

55.

Ravishankar

Geetha

Stack

Marie M.

(2014, February). The gravity model and trade efficiency: A stochastic frontier analysis of Eastern European countries’ potential trade. The World Economy. doi: 10.1111/twec.12144

56.

Rodrik

Dani

. (1998). Why do more open countries have large governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 758–879.

57.

Rodrik

Dani

. (2000). Trade policy as institutional reforms. Cambridge, MA: Department of Economics, Harvard University.

58.

Sen

Ashish

. (2006). Maximum likelihood estimation of gravity model parameters (online). Journal of Regional Science, 26(3), 461–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1986.tb01054.x

59.

Sen

Asher

(2006). BIMSTEC–Japan economic partnership. In CSIRD (ed.), Towards BIMSTEC–Japan comprehensive economic cooperation: The benefits of moving together (pp. 31–51). London: Anthem Press.

60.

Sen

Srivastava

Sadhana.

(2012, August). Asia’s international production networks: Will India be the next assembly Centre? ARTNET Working Paper No. 118.

61.

Singh

Nirvikar

. (2002). Information technology and India’s economic development. Working Paper Series,Economics Department, University of California, Santa Cruz.

62.

Singh

Nirvikar

. (2004). Information technology as an engine of broad-based growth in India. Development and Comp Systems 0412012, Economics Working Paper Archive, Washington University, Seattle.

63.

Stiglitz

(2004). Globalization and growth in emerging markets. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26(4), 465–484.

64.

Sulaiman

R.V.

Hall

Andy

Reddy

T.S.V.

(2011). Missing the target: Lessons from enabling innovation in South Asia. Working Paper Series No. 2011–050.

65.

Taneja

Nisha

Mehra

Mukherjee

Bimal

Dayal

. (2013, September). Normalizing India Pakistan trade. Working Paper No. 267, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.

66.

Tharakan

P.K.M.

(2005). India’s software exports. Review of Economics and Statistics.

67.

Tharakan

P. K. M.

Beveren

Ilke Van

Ourti

Tom van

. (2005). Determinants of India’s software exports and goods exports. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(4), 776–780.

68.

Vaidyanathan

(2008). Technology parks in a developing country: Ihe case of India. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 285–299.

69.

Wacziarg

(1997). Trade, competition and market size. Cambridge, MA: Department of Economics, Harvard University.

70.

Wignaraja

Lazaro

(2010). North-South vs. South-South Asian FTAs: Trends, compatibilities, and ways Forward. UNU-CRIS Working paper W-2010/3.

71.

Wilson

J.S.

Mann

C.L.

Otsuki

(2004, February). The potential benefit of trade facilitation: A global perspective. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3224, World Bank, Washington, DC.

72.

World Bank. (2008). Global economic prospects 2008: Technology Diffusion in the developing world. Washington DC: World Bank.

73.

World Bank. (2010). World Bank’s Logistic Performance Indicator. Retrieved July 2014, from http://lpi.worldbank.org/

74.

World Bank. (2013, January). Global economic prospects. Washington, DC: World Bank.

75.

World Bank. (2013). ASEAN integration and monitoring report. A joint report by the ASEAN Secretariat and the World Bank. Washington, DC.

76.

World Trade Organization (WTO). (1995). Regionalism and the world trading system. Geneva: WTO.