Many countries are shifting to polymer banknotes in place of paper banknotes in order to reduce counterfeits, cost of production, and increase self life of the banknotes. With similar reasons some countries have issued hybrid polymer banknotes also. The article analyzes the pro and cons of polymer banknotes in the light of data available from secondary sources. It may help policy and decision makers in many countries who are planning to switch either from paper note to polymer banknotes and are continuing with paper banknotes.
CoventryL. (2001), “Cost-Effectiveness of Polymer Currency Notes – Australia's Experience”, Paper presented at the XV Pacific Rim Banknote Printers' Conference, Thailand – November 2001.
10.
ConventryL. (2001), “Life of polymer currency notes-A study”, Paper Presented at the XV Pacific Rim, Banknote Printers' Conference, Thailand-November 2001.
Jorge Eduardo Galan Camacho and Miguel Sarmiento Paipilla (2007), “Banknote Printing at Modern Central banking; Trends, Costs, and Efficiency”, http://www.banrep.gov.co/docum/ftp/borra476.pdf.
13.
LangB.BarryJohn (2000), “Polymer Banknotes”, Reserve Bank of New Zealand: Bulletin, Vol. 62 (2), pp. 44–46.
14.
LangB. (2002), “Polymer Banknotes-the New Zealand experience”, RESERVE BANK OF NEW ZEALAND: Bulletin, Vol. 65 (1), pp. 53–57.
15.
LangB. (2004), “Polymer banknotes in New Zealand” “the five year report”, Reserve Bank of New Zealand.
MenziesGordon (2004), “Money to burn, or to melt”?A cost-benefit analysis of Australian polymer banknotes, North American Journal of Economics and Finance December, 15 (3), pp. 355.
18.
MansorLokman (2000), “Money comes, money goes, polymer stays”, Business Times. July 7, pp. 03.
