Toward a Relational Perspective on Hybrid Entrepreneurship: Institutional Complexity and the Co-Construction of Liminal Space in Hybrid Female Entrepreneurship
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Toward a Relational Perspective on Hybrid Entrepreneurship: Institutional Complexity and the Co-Construction of Liminal Space in Hybrid Female Entrepreneurship
This study examines hybrid entrepreneurship (HE) in non-Western contexts where informal and non-market institutions are central. Based on 31 case studies of female hybrid entrepreneurs in Ethiopia and 64 in-depth interviews, we conceptualize HE as a relational, co-constructed process shaped by institutional complexity. Women enact HE in liminal spaces sustained through relational practices: reconfiguring boundaries, cultivating ambiguity and gray areas, and maintaining webs of reciprocity. Institutional complexity both enables and constrains HE, underscoring its social embeddedness rather than individual agency. The study advances research on HE, female entrepreneurship, and institutional complexity by foregrounding relational dynamics and gendered experiences.
AbubakreM.FaikI.MkansiM. (2021). Digital entrepreneurship and indigenous value systems: An Ubuntu perspective. Information Systems Journal, 31(6), 838–862.
2.
AckerJ. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464.
3.
AhlH. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621.
4.
AhlstromD.BrutonG. D. (2002). An institutional perspective on the role of culture in shaping strategic actions by technology-focused entrepreneurial firms in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 53–68.
5.
AlbrechtN.ReineckeP. C.BaumM.IsidorR.BoddingtonM. I. (2026). Perceived pain or gain: Role identity, gratification, and the well-being of hybrid entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587261419463
6.
AppiahG.ZahoorN.HirekhanM. (2025). The weaker vessel. Survival tactics of women entrepreneurs in Ghana’s informal economy. International Small Business Journal,43(5), 553–588.
7.
AredoD. (2010). The Iddir: An informal insurance arrangement in Ethiopia. Savings and Development, 34(1), 53–72.
8.
ArdiantiR.ObschonkaM.DavidssonP. (2022). Psychological well-being of hybrid entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 17, e00294.
9.
AsanteE. A.DanquahB.OduroF.Affum-OseiE.TwumasiM. A.AzunuC.LiC. (2022). Entrepreneurial career persistence of hybrid entrepreneurs: The opposing moderating roles of wage work-to-entrepreneurship enrichment and entrepreneurship-to-wage work enrichment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 132, Article 103660.
10.
BacqS.HertelC.LumpkinG. T. (2022). Communities at the nexus of entrepreneurship and societal impact: A cross-disciplinary literature review. Journal of Business Venturing, 37, Article 106231.
11.
Barner-RasmussenW.EhrnroothM.KoveshnikovA.MäkeläK. (2014). Cultural and language skills as resources for boundary spanning within the MNC. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(7), 886–905.
12.
BattilanaJ.LecaB.BoxenbaumE. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.
13.
BrändleL.KuckertzA. (2022). Staged entrepreneurship: The formation of hybrid and spawning entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Economics, 92(6), 955–996.
14.
BaughnC. C.ChuaB. L.NeupertK. E. (2006). The normative context for women’s participation in entrepreneurship: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 687–708.
15.
BenitezI.BonillaC. A.VergaraM. (2024). Hybrid entrepreneurship and risk. Small Business Economics, 63(3), 1171–1196.
16.
BlockJ. H.LandgrafA. (2016). Transition from part-time entrepreneurship to full-time entrepreneurship: The role of financial and non-financial motives. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(1), 259–282.
17.
BothelloJ.NasonR. S.SchnyderG. (2019). Institutional voids and organization studies: Towards an epistemological rupture. Organization Studies, 40(10), 1499–1512.
18.
BrannenM. Y. (2004). When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit, and the semiotics of foreignness. The Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 593–616.
19.
BrattströmA.WennbergK. (2022). The entrepreneurial story and its implications for research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(6), 1443–1468.
20.
BrushC. G.De BruinA.WelterF. (2009). A gender-aware framework for women’s entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 8–24.
21.
BrutonG. D.AhlstromD.LiH. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.
22.
BulloughA.GuelichU.ManolovaT. S.SchjoedtL. (2022). Women’s entrepreneurship and culture: Gender role expectations and identities, societal culture, and the entrepreneurial environment. Small Business Economics, 58(2), 985–996.
23.
CarrJ. C.MarshallD. R.MichaelisT. L.PollackJ.M.SheatsL. (2023). The role of work-to-venture role conflict on hybrid entrepreneurs’ transition into entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(5), 2302–2325.
24.
ChowdhuryF.AudretschD. B.BelitskiM. (2019). Institutions and entrepreneurship quality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 51–81.
25.
ColovicA.MehrotraS. (2020). Lifelong activism and women’s entrepreneurship: How a social movement organization improves conditions for self-employed women in India. European Business Review, 32(5), 937–958.
26.
CorleyK. G. (2015). A commentary on “what grounded theory is…”: Engaging a phenomenon from the perspective of those living it. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 600–605.
27.
CovinJ. G.LumpkinG. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855–872.
28.
CruzC.JustoR.Larraza-KintanaM.Garcés-GaldeanoL. (2019). When do women make a better table? Examining the influence of women directors on family firm’s corporate social performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2), 282–301.
29.
DattaP. B.GaileyR. (2012). Empowering women through social entrepreneurship: Case study of a women’s cooperative in India. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 569–587.
30.
DemirC.WernerA.KrausS.JonesP. (2022). Hybrid entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 34(1), 29–52.
31.
DerconS.De WeerdtJ.BoldT.PankhurstA. (2006). Group-based funeral insurance in Ethiopia and Tanzania. World Development, 34(4), 685–703.
32.
De SmetS.BoroşS. (2021). Revisiting women empowerment through a cultural lens: A in-depth analysis of empowerment methodologies in horticulture in rural Ethiopia. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 536656.
33.
De VitaL.MariM.PoggesiS. (2014). Women entrepreneurs in and from developing countries: Evidences from the literature. European Management Journal, 32(3), 451–460.
34.
DzomondaO.FatokiO. (2018). Demystifying the motivations towards hybrid entrepreneurship among the working populace in South Africa. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 24(4), 1–9.
35.
DohJ.RodriguesS.Saka-HelmhoutA.MakhijaM. (2017). International business responses to institutional voids. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 293–307.
36.
DostM. (2025). Hybrid entrepreneurship: Navigating traditional employment while launching startups through a constructivist grounded theory approach. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 38, 158–178.
37.
EjazL.GrinevichV.Karatas-OzkanM. (2023). Women’s informal entrepreneurship through the lens of institutional voids and institutional logics. Gender, Work & Organization, 30(4), 1254–1272.
38.
FentersV. W.BalvenR. M.AshforthB. E.WaldmanD. A.SiegelD. S. (2025). How identity structure influences identity adoption: The case of hybrid entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 68(3), 567–597.
39.
FieldsG. S. (2019). Self-employment and poverty in developing countries. IZA World of Labor.
ForresterJ. K.NevilleF. (2021). An institutional perspective on borrowing discouragement among female-owned enterprises and the role of regional female empowerment. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(6), Article 106156.
42.
Gänser-SticklerG. M.SchulzM.SchwensC. (2022). Sitting on the fence—Untangling the role of uncertainty in entrepreneurship and paid employment for hybrid entry. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(2), Article 106176.
43.
GeJ.CarneyM.KellermannsF. (2019). Who fills institutional voids? Entrepreneurs’ utilization of political and family ties in emerging markets. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(6), 1124–1147.
44.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
45.
GiménezD.CalabròA. (2017). The salient role of institutions in women’s entrepreneurship: A critical review and agenda for future research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(3), 857–882.
46.
GrasD.NasonR. S. (2015). Bric by Bric: The role of the family household in sustaining a venture in impoverished Indian slums. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 546–563.
47.
GreenwoodR.RaynardM.KodeihF.MicelottaE. R.LounsburyM. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.
48.
GudetaK. H.van EngenM. L. (2018). Work-life boundary management styles of women entrepreneurs in Ethiopia–“choice” or imposition?. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(3), 368–386.
49.
GümüsayA. A. (2020). The potential for plurality and prevalence of the religious institutional logic. Business & Society, 59(5), 855–880.
50.
HaileH. B.BockB.FolmerH. (2012). Microfinance and female empowerment: Do institutions matter?Women’s Studies International Forum, 35(4), 256–265.
51.
HunderaM. B.DuystersGeertNaudéWimDijkhuizenJ. (2021). How do role conflict intensity and coping strategies affect the success of women entrepreneurs in Africa? Evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Small Business Management, 59(6), 1180–1210.
52.
JenningsJ. E.BrushC. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 663–715.
53.
JenningsP.GreenwoodR.LounsburyM.SuddabyR. (2013). ‘Institutions, entrepreneurs, and communities: A special issue on entrepreneurship’.Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 1–9.
54.
JonesJ.MurrayA. (2025). Contending with perceived legitimacy tensions: Impact investing in pluralistic institutional environments. Journal of Management Studies, 63(1), 232–269.
55.
KappeK.UrbigD.LengsfeldS.CarrJ. C.RupiettaC. (2025). When entrepreneurship and employment collide: Conflicts of hybrid entrepreneurs and their impact on wage employment satisfaction. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 24, e00564.
56.
KebedeW.ButterfieldA. K. (2009). Social networks among poor women in Ethiopia. International Social Work, 52(3), 357–373.
57.
KeneaD. A.YemaneF. (2020). Institutional development in Ethiopia: Challenges and policy options. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 7(2), 69–88.
58.
KhavulS.BrutonG. D.WoodE. (2009). Informal family business in Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6), 1219–1238.
59.
KhouryT. A.PrasadA. (2016). Entrepreneurship amid concurrent institutional constraints in less developed countries. Business & Society, 55(7), 934–969.
60.
KlyverK.SteffensP.LombergC. (2020). Having your cake and eating it too? A two-stage model of the impact of employment and parallel job search on hybrid nascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(5), Article 106042.
61.
KuskeJ.SchulzM.SchwensC. (2025). Hybrid entrepreneurship and entrepreneurs’ well-being: The moderating effect of role demands outside entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 49(3), 750–781.
62.
LampelJ.BhallaA.RamachandranK. (2017). Family values and inter-institutional governance of strategic decision making in Indian family firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(4), 901–930.
63.
LeeM. D. P.LounsburyM. (2015). Filtering institutional logics: Community logic variation and differential responses to the institutional complexity of toxic waste. Organization Science, 26(3), 847–866.
64.
LewisA. C.CrabbeR. C. (2024). The entrepreneurship of marginalized groups and compatibility between the market and emancipation. Journal of Business Venturing, 39(4), Article 106408.
65.
LiuZ.WuG. (2022). Gendered motives towards hybrid entrepreneurial intentions: Empirical evidence from China. International Studies of Economics, 17(1), 36–64.
66.
LockeK.Golden-BiddleK.FeldmanM. S. (2008). Perspective—Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, 19(6), 907–918.
67.
MairJ.MartiI. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435.
68.
MairJ.MartíI.VentrescaM. J. (2012). Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 819–850.
69.
MarlowS.PattonD. (2005). All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance, and gender. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 717–735.
70.
MarlowS.SwailJ. (2014). Gender, risk and finance: Why can’t a woman be more like a man?Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(1–2), 80–96.
71.
MmbagaN. A.LermanM. P.MunyonT. P.LanivichS. E. (2023). Juggling act: Waged time investments and the health–wealth trade-off. Journal of Business Research, 158, Article 113695.
72.
NabiG.WalmsleyA.HoldenR. (2015). Pushed or pulled? Exploring the factors underpinning graduate start-ups and non-start-ups. Journal of Education & Work, 28(5), 481–506.
73.
NasonR.BothelloJ. (2023). Far from void: How institutions shape growth in informal economies. Academy of Management Review, 48(3), 485–503.
74.
NasonR.MuñozP.HaughH.WelterF.GeorgeG.PrashanthamS. (2026). Recalibrating entrepreneurship research: Decolonizing and embracing the pluralism of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Management Studies, 63(1), 1–21.
75.
NewmanA.LewisA.ColesR. (2025). Emancipatory entrepreneurship in postcolonial economies: The clash of institutional systems in the Kejetia marketplace. Journal of Business Venturing, 40(4), Article 106508.
76.
NguyenB. (2021). Regional informal institutions, local governance and gendered entrepreneurship. Regional Studies, 55(7), 1169–1181.
77.
NorthD. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
78.
NordmanC. J. (2016). Do family and kinship networks support entrepreneurs?IZA World of Labor.
79.
O’DonnellP.LegerM.O’GormanC.ClintonE. (2024). Necessity entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 18(1), 44–81.
80.
PrattM. G. (2008). Fitting oval pegs into round holes: Tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 481–509.
81.
PrattM. G.SonensheinS.FeldmanM. S. (2022). Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 211–238.
82.
PufferS. M.McCarthyD. J.BoisotM. (2010). Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 441–467.
83.
RaffieeJ.FengJ. (2014). Should I quit my day job? A hybrid path to entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 936–963.
84.
RaynardM. (2016). Deconstructing complexity: Configurations of institutional complexity and structural hybridity. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 310–335.
85.
RindovaV. P.SrinivasS. B.MartinsL. L. (2022). How to break free: An orders-of-worth perspective on emancipatory entrepreneurship. In EberhartR. N.LounsburyM.AldrichH. E. (Eds.), Entrepreneurialism and society: New theoretical perspectives (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 81, pp. 101–127). Emerald Publishing Limited.
86.
SchulzM.UrbigD.ProcherV. (2016). Hybrid entrepreneurship and public policy: The case of firm entry deregulation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(3), 272–286.
87.
ScottL.DolanC.Johnstone-LouisM.SugdenK.WuM. (2012). Enterprise and inequality: A study of Avon in South Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 543–568.
88.
ScottW. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.
89.
SimbaA.OgundanaO. M.BrauneE.DanaL. P. (2023). Community financing in entrepreneurship: A focus on women entrepreneurs in the developing world. Journal of Business Research, 163, Article 113962.
90.
ShaneS.VenkataramanS. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
91.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
92.
SydowA.CannatelliB. L.GiudiciA.MolteniM. (2022). Entrepreneurial workaround practices in severe institutional voids: Evidence from Kenya. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(2), 331–367.
93.
ThorgrenS.SirénC.NordströmC.WincentJ. (2016). Hybrid entrepreneurs’ second-step choice: The nonlinear relationship between age and intention to enter full-time entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5, 14–18.
94.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW.LounsburyM. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.
95.
Van BurgE.CornelissenJ.StamW.JackS. (2022). Advancing qualitative entrepreneurship research: Leveraging methodological plurality for achieving scholarly impact. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(1), 3–20.
96.
WebbJ. W.BrutonG. D.TihanyiL.IrelandR. D. (2013). Research on entrepreneurship in the informal economy: Framing a research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 598–614.
97.
WebbJ. W.KhouryT. A.HittM. A. (2020). The Influence of formal and informal institutional voids on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(3), 504–526.
98.
WebbJ. W.TihanyiL.IrelandR. D.SirmonD. G. (2009). You say illegal, I say legitimate: Entrepreneurship in the informal economy. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 492–510.
99.
WelterF. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.
100.
WelterF.BrushC.de BruinA. (2014). The gendering of entrepreneurship context (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2557272). Social Science Research Network.
101.
WilliamsonG. (2024). Using O*Net to study the intersection of entrepreneurship and employment: A primer. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 48(6), 1556–1579.
102.
WilliamsT. A.ZhaoE. Y.SonensheinS.UcbasaranD.GeorgeG. (2021). Breaking boundaries to creatively generate value: The role of resourcefulness in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(5), Article 106141.
103.
WilliamsC. C.Martinez–PerezA.KedirA. M. (2017). Informal entrepreneurship in developing economies: The impacts of starting up unregistered on firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 773–799.
104.
WilliamsN.WilliamsC. C. (2012). Evaluating the socio-spatial contingency of entrepreneurial motivations: A case study of English deprived urban neighborhoods. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(7–8), 661–684.
105.
YangS.KherR.NewbertS. L. (2020). What signals matter for social startups? It depends: The influence of gender role congruity on social impact accelerator selection decisions. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(2), Article 105932.
106.
YenkeyC. B. (2015). Mobilizing a market: Ethnic segmentation and investor recruitment into the Nairobi Securities Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(4), 561–595.
107.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Sage.
108.
ZhangC.LanY.LiB.LiuX.JenningsJ.ZhaoW. G. W.XiaY. (2026). Entrepreneurship in the shadow of clan culture: Informal institutions and entrepreneurs’ subjective well-being. Journal of Small Business Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2025.2594739
109.
ZhaoE. Y.YangL. (2021). Women hold up half the sky? Informal institutions, entrepreneurial decisions, and gender gap in venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(6), 1431–1462.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
