A Rational-Choice Explanation of Composition Effects in Educational Research

Abstract

The study of compositional effects is a central interest of sociologists in the field of educational research. In particular, the positive effect of the average achievement level of classes and ability groups on individual achievements of students has attracted much attention. This article presents a rational-choice theoretical model that (1) explains this compositional effect, (2) explains the differential effect of ability grouping on the achievements of low-and high-achieving students, and (3) predicts that the compositional effect is larger for low-achieving than for high-achieving students. By introducing new assumptions the model can be used to produce new hypotheses. This is illustrated by a derivation of hypotheses about the effects of different disciplinary climates on schools. It is concluded that a rational choice model can provide explanatory mechanisms currently lacking in research on compositional effects.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barr, R. and R. Dreeben . 1983. How schools work. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Beckerman, T. M. , and T. L. Good . 1981. The classroom ratio of high and low-aptitude students and its effects on achievement. American Educational Research Journal 18:317-327.

Blalock, H. M. 1984. Contextual-effects models: Theoretical and methodological issues. Annual Review of Sociology 10:353-372.

Boudon, R. 1979. La logique du social. Paris: Librairie Hachette.

Coleman, J. S. 1976. Social structure and a theory of action. In Approaches to the study of social structure, edited by P. M. Blau , 76-93. London: Open Books.

Coleman, J. S. 1986. Social theory, social research and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology 91:1309-1335.

Coleman, J. S. T. Hoffer and S. Kilgore . 1982. High school achievement. New York: Basic Books.

Dar, Y. , and N. Resh . 1986. Classroom intellectual composition and academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal 23:357-374.

Erbring, L. , and A. A. Young , 1979. Individuals and social structure: Contextual effects as endogenous feedback. Sociological Methods and Research 7:396-430.

10.

Gamoran, A. 1986. Instructional and institutional effects of ability grouping. Sociology of Education 59:185-198.

11.

Janssens, F.J.G. 1986. De evaluatiepraktijken van leerkrachten (The evaluation practices of teachers). Ph.D. diss., University of Groningen (with a summary in English).

12.

Hallinan, M. T. 1987. Ability grouping and student learning. In The social organization of schools, edited by M.T. Hallinan , 41-69. New York and London: Plenum.

13.

Hallinan, M. T. 1988. School composition and learning: a critique of the Dreeben-Barr model. Sociology of Education 61:143-146.

14.

Karweit, N. 1987. Diversity, equity, and classroom processes. In The social organization of schools, edited by M.T. Hallinan ; 71-102. New York and London: Plenum.

15.

Kerckhoff, A. D. , 1986. Effects of ability grouping in British secondary schools. American Sociological Review 51:842-858.

16.

Leiter, J. 1983. Classroom composition and achievement gains. Sociology of Education 56:126-132.

17.

Lindenberg, S. 1985. Rational choice and sociological theory. Zeitschrift fur die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 141:244-255.

18.

Lipsey, R. G. , P. O. Steiner , and D. D. Purvis . 1984. Economics. New York: Harper & Row.

19.

Mensen, T. , and H. Guldemond . 1987. Groepseffecten op individuele leerprestaties. Mens en Maatschappij 62:176-199.

20.

Rowan, B. , and A. W. Miracle, Jr. , 1983. Systems of ability grouping and the stratification of achievement in elementary schools. Sociology of Education 56:133-144.

21.

Sprague, J. 1982. Is there a micro-theory consistent with contextual analysis? In Strategies of political inquiry, edited by E. Ostrom , 99-121. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

22.

Van der Wolf, J. C. 1984. Schooluitval. Lisse: Swets en Zeitlinger.

23.

Wright, G. 1984. Behavioural decision theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin.