Transient Dynamics of Semiactive Suspensions with Hybrid Control

Abstract

The effect of hybrid control technique on transient dynamics of semiactive vehicle suspensions is studied analytically, using a quarter-car model. Hybrid semiactive control refers to a technique that mathematically combines the commonly used skyhook and groundhook control methods. The transient analysis includes an evaluation of the effect of hybrid control on different aspects of the suspension dynamics, vehicle body response, and axle dynamics, due to a step input at the wheel. The damper force–velocity trajectories, vehicle body and axle response, and vehicle body jerk are among the metrics that are examined as part of this analysis. The results of the study show that several tradeoffs exist between the transient response of the vehicle body and the axle. The tradeoffs can be adjusted through changing the hybrid control gain, which shifts the emphasis on skyhook and groundhook controls. The results further indicate that, in balance, hybrid control can be more effective in controlling suspension dynamics than either skyhook or groundhook control.

Keywords

semiactive suspension vehicle skyhook groundhook hybrid control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmadian, M. and Pare, C. 2000. “A Quarter-car Experimental Analysis of Alternative Semiactive Control Methods” , Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 11(8): 604–612 .

Ahmadian, M. , Reichart, B. , Song, X. and Southward, S. January 1999. “No-Jerk Semiactive Skyhook Control Method and Apparatus”, United States Patent # 6,115,658.

Ahmadian, M. et al. September 5, 2000. “No Jerk Semiactive Suspension System”, US Patent 6,115,658.

Crosby, M.J. and Karnopp, D.C. 1973. “The Active Damper”, In: The Shock and Vibrations Bulletin 43, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC .

Giua, A. , Seatzu, C. and Usai, G. 1999. “Semi-Active Suspension Design with an Optimal Gain Switching Target” , Vehicle System Dynamics, 31(4): 213–232 .

Hennecke, D. , Baier, P. , Jordan, B. and Walek, E. 1990. “EDC III – The New Variable Damper System for BMW’s Top Models – A Further Development of Our Adaptive, Frequency-dependent Damper Control”, SAE Technical Paper Series, No. 900662, Warrendale, PA.

Hiu, F.L. and Wei, H.L. 2001. “Semi-Active Control of Automotive Suspension Systems with Magnetorheological Dampers”, In: Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 4327, pp. 125–136.

Ivers, D.E. and Miller, L.R. 1989. “Experimental Comparison of Passive, Semi-active On/Off, and Semi-Active Continuous Suspensions”, SAE Technical Paper Series, 892484.

Lee, H.S. and Choi, S.B. 2000. “Control and Response Characteristics of a Magneto-Rheological Fluid Damper for Passenger Vehicles” , Journal of Intelligent Material Systems & Structures, 11(1): 80–87 .

10.

Lieh, J. and Li, W.J. 1997. “Adaptive Fuzzy Control of Vehicle Semi-Active Suspensions”, In: ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, DSC, Vol. 61, Fairfield, NJ, pp. 293–297.

11.

Simon, D.E. and Ahmadian, M. April 2002. “An Alternative Semiactive Control Method for Sport Utility Vehicles” , Journal of Automobile Engineering, Part D, 216: 125–139 .

12.

Sohn, H.C. , Hong, K.S. and Hedrick, J.K. 2000. “Semi-Active Control of the McPherson Suspension System: Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulations”, In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Vol. 1, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 982–987.

13.

Song, X. 1999. “Design of Adaptive Vibration Control Systems with Application to Magneto-Rheological Dampers,” PhD Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.