Comparison of Piezoelectric,Magnetostrictive,and Electrostrictive Hybrid Hydraulic Actuators

Abstract

In recent years, active material driven actuators have been widely researched for potential applications in the fields of aerospace, automotive, and civil engineering. While most of these active materials, such as piezoelectric, magnetostrictive, and electrostrictive materials, have high force and bandwidth capabilities, they are limited in stroke. In combination with hydraulic systems, the field-dependent motion of these materials can be amplified to produce high force, high stroke actuators. In a hybrid hydraulic pump, the motion of an active material is used to pressurize a hydraulic fluid. Since the properties of active materials vary greatly in terms of free strain and block force, there is a need to identify the optimum active material for a particular application. This study compares four active materials, Lead—Zirconate—Titanate (PZT), Lead—Magnesium—Niobate (PMN), Terfenol-D and Galfenol, as the drivers of a hybrid hydraulic actuation system. The performance of each of these active materials has been evaluated in the same hydraulic actuator through systematic testing of the actuator while maintaining the same length and volume for each active material. In each case, the active material has a length of around 54 mm and a cross-sectional area of 25 mm2. Commonly used metrics such as output power and electromechanical efficiency are used for comparison. Of the four materials tested in this study, PMN presented the largest free strain (2000 με), while Galfenol presented the least (300 με). The highest no-load velocity is also exhibited by the PMN-based actuator (270 mm/s). The maximum output power obtained is 2.5 W for both PMN and Terfenol-D-based actuators while the highest electromechanical efficiency obtained is 7% for the PMN-based actuator.

Keywords

piezoelectric magnetostrictive electrostrictive hybrid actuator power efficiency.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cadou, C. and Zhang, B. 2003. ``Performance Modeling of a PiezoHydraulic Actuator '' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures , 14(3):149—160.

Damjanovic, D. and Newnham, R.E. 1992. ``Electrostrictive and Piezoelectric Materials for Actuator Applications,'' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 3(2):190—208.

Duong, J. and Garcia, E. 1996. ``Design and Performance of a Rotary Motor Driven by Piezoelectric Stack Actuators,'' Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1, 35(12A):6334—6341.

Ellison, J. 2004. Investigation of Active Materials as Driving Elements in a Hydraulic-hybrid Actuator, Master's Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Frank, J.E. , Mockensturm, E.M. , Koopmann, G.H. , Lesieutre, G.A. , Chen, W. and Loverich, J.Y. 2003. ``Modeling and Design Optimization of a Bimorph-driven Rotary Motor,'' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 14(4—5):217—227.

Galante, T. , Frank, J.E. , Bernard, J. , Chen, W. , Lesieutre, G.A. and Koopmann, G.H. 2000. ``Design, Modeling, and Performance of a High Force Piezoelectric Inchworm Motor,'' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 10(12):962—972.

Hemsel, T. and Wallaschek, J. 2000. ``Survey of the Present State of the Art of Piezoelectric Linear Motors,'' Ultrasonics, 38(1—8):37—40.

Janocha, H. , Schaefer, J.J.D. and Jendritza, J. 1994. ``Piezoelectric and Magnetostrictive Materials for use in Smart Actuators,'' In: Proceedings of the Joint Hungarian — British International Mechatronics Conference , September 21—23, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 397—404.

John, S. , Cadou, C. , Yoo, J.-H. and Wereley, N. 2006. ``Application of CFD in the Design and Analysis of a Piezoelectric Hydraulic Pump,'' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 17(11):967—979.

10.

Konishi, K. , Ukida, H. and Kotani, T. 1997. ``Hydraulic Actuators Driven by Piezoelectric Elements (4th report, Construction of Mathematical Models for Simulation),'' Journal of Japanese Society of Mechanical Engineering (C), 63(605):158—165.

11.

Konishi, K. , Ukida, H. and Sawada, K. 1998. ``Hydraulic Actuators Driven by Multilayered Piezoelectric Elements — Mathematical Model and Application to Brake Device,'' In: Proceedings of the 13th Korean Automatic Control Conference , pp. 474—479.

12.

Lam, A.H.-F. and Liao, W.-H. 2003. ``Semi-Active Control of Automotive Suspension Systems with Magnetorheological Dampers,'' International Journal of Vehicle Design, 33(1—3):50—75.

13.

Mauck, L. , Oates, W. and Lynch, C. 2001. ``Piezoelectric Hydraulic Pump Performance,'' In: Proceedings of the SPIE — Smart Structures and Materials 2001 — Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies, Vol. 4332, pp. 246—253.

14.

Mauck, L.D. and Lynch, C.S. 2000. ``Piezoelectric Hydraulic Pump Development,'' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 11(10):758—764.

15.

Nasser, K. and Leo, D. 2000. ``Effciency of Frequency-rectified Piezohydraulic and Piezopneumatic Actuation,'' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 11(10):798—810.

16.

Nasser, K. , Leo, D.J. and Cudney, H.H. 2000. ``Compact Piezohydraulic Actuation System,'' In: Proceedings of the 7th SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, Vol. 3991, pp. 312—322.

17.

Oates, W. and Lynch, C. 2001. ``Piezoelectric Hydraulic Pump System Dynamic Model ,'' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures , 11:798—810.

18.

Pan, M.-J. , Rehrig, P.W. , Kucera, J.P. , Park, S.-E. and Hackenberger, W.S. 2000. ``Comparison of Actuator Properties for Piezoelectric and Electrostrictive Materials,'' In: Proceedings of SPIE — The International Society for Optical Engineering, Smart Structures and Materials 2000 — Active Materials: Behavior and Mechanics, Vol. 3992, pp. 80—90.

19.

Pomirleanu, R. and Giurgiutiu, V. 2004. ``High-Field Characterization of Piezoelectric and Magnetostrictive Actuators,'' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures , 15(3):161—180.

20.

Prechtl, E. and Hall, S. 1999. ``Design of a High Efficiency, Large Stroke, Electromechanical Actuator,'' Smart Materials and Structures, 8(1):13—30.

21.

Regelbrugge, M. , Lindler, J. and Anderson, E. 2003. ``Design Model for Piezo-hydraulic Actuators,'' In: Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/ ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Vol. 3, pp. 2163—2171.

22.

Sashida, T. and Kenjo, T. 1993. An Introduction to Ultrasonic Motors, Claredon Press, Oxford.

23.

Shoji, S. and Esashi, M. 1994. ``Microflow Devices and Systems,'' Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 4(4):157—171.

24.

Sirohi, J. 2002. Piezoelectric Hydraulic Hybrid Actuator for a Potential Smart Rotor Application, PhD Thesis, University of Maryland , College Park, MD, USA.

25.

Sirohi, J. , Cadou, C. and Chopra, I. 2005. ``Investigation of the Dynamic Characteristics of a Piezohydraulic Actuator,'' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures , 16(6):481—492.

26.

Sirohi, J. and Chopra, I. 2003. ``Design and Development of a High Pumping Frequency Piezoelectric—Hydraulic Hybrid Actuator,'' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 14(3):135—147.

27.

Uchino, K. 1997. Piezoelectric Actuators and Ultrasonic Motors, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

28.

Yoo, J.-H. , Sirohi, J. and Wereley, N.M. 2005. ``A Magnetorheological Piezohydraulic Actuator ,'' Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures , 16(11—12):945—953.

29.

Zhao, J. and Zhang, Q.M. 1996. ``Effect of Mechanical Stress on the Electromechanical Performance of PZT and PMN-PT Ceramics,'' In: Proceedings of the 1996 10th IEEE International Symposium on Applications of Ferroelectrics, ISAF'96. Part 2 (of 2), 18—21 August, East Brunswick, NJ, USA, Vol. 2, pp. 971—974.