A Scale to Measure the Effectiveness of Casework (CES-10)

Abstract

Purpose: One of the challenges in social casework is the measurement of its effectiveness, and the challenge mainly arises due to the lack of a standardized tool. The present research is aimed at filling that gap through the development of a scientific scale to measure the effectiveness of casework practice. Method: Data were collected from 202 former casework clients across 22 organizations in India. The collected data were then used to carry out both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Discussion: The 10-item casework effectiveness scale (CES-10) has been found to be highly valid and reliable (Cronbach alpha: .956). Across multiple types of validity and reliability indicators. Apart from making a wide range of studies possible, the tool also opens the door to future randomized controlled trials, to help test and build scientific evidence for social casework practice. CES-10 is now publicly available and free to use.

Keywords

casework casework effectiveness scale CES-10 exploratory factor analysis confirmatory factor analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander. (2019, May 16). Composite reliability: Definition. Statistics How To. https://www.statisticshowto.com/composite-reliability-definition/

Beck

A. T.

Steer

R. A.

Brown

(1996). Beck depression inventory–II [Dataset].

Borenstein

Hedges

L. V.

Higgins

J. P. T.

Rothstein

H. R.

(2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, second edition. Guilford Publications.

Cheetham

(1992). Evaluating social work effectiveness. Research on Social Work Practice, 2(3), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973159200200303

Cheung

G. W.

Cooper-Thomas

H. D.

Lau

R. S.

Wang

L. C.

(2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

Child Outcomes Research Consortium. (2024). Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) & Child Outcome Rating Scale (CORS). https://www.corc.uk.net/outcome-experience-measures/directory-of-outcome-measures/outcome-rating-scale-ors-child-outcome-rating-scale-cors/

Comrey

A. L.

Lee

H. B.

(1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.

Cordero

C. P.

Dans

A. L.

(2021). Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: Detecting and dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 130, 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.045

10.

Dannels

S. A.

(2018). Research Design. In Hancock

G. R.

Stapleton

L. M.

Mueller

R. O.

(Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 31–32). Routledge.

11.

Dollard

Mowrer

O. H.

(1947). A method of measuring tension in written documents. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054341

12.

Fischer

(1973). Is casework effective? A review. Social Work, 18(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/18.1.5

13.

Flora

D. B.

Flake

J. K.

(2017). The purpose and practice of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in psychological research: Decisions for scale development and validation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 49(2), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000069

14.

Fook

(2022). Social work: A critical approach to practice. Sage.

15.

Friedlander

W. A.

(1976). Concepts and methods of social work. Prentice Hall Professional.

16.

Goretzko

Pham

T. T. H.

Bühner

(2021). Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3510–3521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00300-2

17.

Hariton

Locascio

J. J.

(2018). Randomised controlled trials—The gold standard for effectiveness research. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 125(13), 1716. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15199

18.

Hollis

(1954). Casework diagnosis—what and why? 1. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 24(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377315409512862

19.

Hollis

(1967). Principles and assumptions underlying casework practice. In Social work and social values (pp. 12–28). Routledge.

20.

Hunt

J. V.

(1948). Measuring movement in casework. The Journal of Social Casework, 29(9), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438944802900902

21.

Jebb

A. T.

Tay

(2021). A review of key Likert scale development advances: 1995–2019. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547

22.

Jöreskog

K. G.

Olsson

U. H.

Wallentin

F. Y.

(2016). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In Jöreskog

K. G.

Olsson

U. H.

Wallentin

F. Y.

(Eds.), Multivariate analysis with LISREL (pp. 283–339). Springer International Publishing.

23.

Kaiser

H. F.

(1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

24.

Krause

D. J.

Green

S. A.

Koury

S. P.

Hales

T. W.

(2018). Solution-Focused trauma-informed care (SF-TIC): An integration of models. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 12(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2017.1348312

25.

Krishnan

S. R. G.

Joseph

J. J.

(2023). Online learning experiences of social work students in India. Journal of Social Work, 24(2), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173231207962

26.

Kyriazos

Poga

(2023). Dealing with multicollinearity in factor analysis: The problem, detections, and solutions. Open Journal of Statistics, 13(3), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2023.133020

27.

Lowry

(1937). Objectives in social case work. The Family, 18(8), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438943701800801

28.

McGartland Rubio

(2005). Content validity. In Kempf-Leonard

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (pp. 495–498). Elsevier.

29.

Misra

P. D.

(1994). Social work: philosophy and methods. Inter India Publication.

30.

Mullen

E. J.

Dumpson

J. R.

University

(1972). Evaluation of social intervention (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282268670617856

31.

Noora

(2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2

32.

Perlman

H. H.

(1968). Can casework work? Social Service Review, 42(4), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1086/642284

33.

Richmond

(1922). NASW social workers pioneers bio index. https://www.naswfoundation.org/Our-Work/NASW-Social-Work-Pioneers/NASW-Social-Workers-Pioneers-Bio-Index/id/477

34.

Rosenberg

(1995). Rosenberg self-esteem scale [Dataset].

35.

Samuels

(2017, June 9). Advice on exploratory factor analysis [Monograph]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319165677_Advice_on_Exploratory_Factor_Analysis

36.

Slife

B. D.

Wright

C. D.

Yanchar

S. C.

(2016). Using operational definitions in research: A best-practices approach. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 37(2), 119–139. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44631540

37.

Statistische Beratung Leonardo Miljko. (2020). How to interpret SEM model fit results in AMOS. https://www.statistika.co/images/services/How_to_interpret_SEM_model-Fit_results_in_AMOS.pdf

38.

Steyaert

(2009). History of social work, details. https://historyofsocialwork.org/eng/details.php?cps=7&canon_id=133

39.

Taber

K. S.

(2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

40.

Taherdoost

Sahibuddin

Jalaliyoon

(2014). Exploratory factor analysis; concepts and theory. In Balicki

(Ed.), Advances in applied and pure mathematics (Vol. 27, pp. 375–382). WSEAS. https://hal.science/hal-02557344

41.

UCLA. (2025). A practical introduction to factor analysis: Exploratory factor analysis. https://stats.oarc.ucla.edu/spss/seminars/introduction-to-factor-analysis/a-practical-introduction-to-factor-analysis/

42.

Watkins

M. W.

(2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807

43.

Weiss

Adams

M. J.

(2010). Personality, temperament, and behavioral syndromes. In Koob

G. F.

Moal

M. L.

Thompson

R. F.

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavioral neuroscience (pp. 47–53). Academic Press.

44.

Wolf

Joye

Smith

T. W.

(2016). The SAGE handbook of survey methodology. Sage.

45.

World Medical Association. (2022). WMA - The World Medical Association-WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/

46.

Yusof

M. S. B.

(2019). (PDF) ABC of content validation and content validity Index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6