In this keynote address, the author focuses on what we bring to qualitative inquiry and how we conduct our research. What we do, why we do it, and how we do it remain contested issues. She proposes that we look at our methodological premises anew, revisit our principles, and revise our practices. Throughout this address, she draws on Goffman’s methodological insights to provide a foundation for reassessing qualitative inquiry. She argues that researchers can build on Goffman’s ideas to strengthen their methodological practices and research products. Last, she counters current institutional scrutiny of qualitative inquiry and suggests unacknowledged benefits of this work.
Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., & Delamont, S. (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and changes. New York: Rowan and Littlefield.
2.
Becker, H. S. (2003). The politics of presentation: Goffman and total institutions. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 659-669.
3.
Bergson, H. (1961). An introduction to metaphysics (M. L. Andison, Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library. (Original work published 1903)
4.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Bruner, E. M. (2004). Ethnographic practice and human subjects review. Anthropology Newsletter, 45(1), 10-10.
6.
Charmaz, K. (In press-a). Grounded theory in the twenty-first century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. E. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.).
7.
Charmaz, K. (In press-b). Stories and silences: Disclosures and self in chronic Illness. In D. Brashers & D. Goldstein (Eds.), Health communication.
8.
Charmaz, K. (2002a). The self as habit: The reconstruction of self in chronic illness. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 22(Suppl. 1), S31-S41.
9.
Charmaz, K. (2002b). Stories and silences: Disclosures and self in chronic illness. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 302-328.
10.
Charmaz, K., & Mitchell, R. G. (1996). The myth of silent authorship: Self, substance, and style in ethnographic writing. Symbolic Interaction, 19(4), 285-302.
11.
Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The social significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33,14-32.
12.
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.
13.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994).Preface. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. ix-xii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
DeVault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Diamond, T. (1992). Making gray gold: Narratives of nursing home care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
DiGiacomo, S. M. (1992). Metaphor as illness: Postmodern dilemmas in the representation of body, mind and disorder. Medical Anthropology, 14, 109-137.
17.
Fine, G. A. (1986). With the boys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Fine, G. A. (1996). Kitchens. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
Fine, G. A. (1998). Morel tales. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Frank, A. W. (1999). At the will of the body. New York: Houghlin Mifflin.
21.
Glaser, B. (2002). Constructivist grounded theory?Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Online Journal], 3. Retrieved April 5, 2004, from http://www.qualitative-research.%20net/fqs-texte/3-02/3-02glaser-e-htm
22.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
23.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
24.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
26.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
27.
Goffman, E. (1989). On fieldwork. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18, 123-132.
28.
Harding, S. (2004). How standpoint methodology informs philosophy of social science. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice (pp. 62-80). New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Lee, R. M. (1995). Dangerous fieldwork. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Meadows, L. M. & Morse, J. M. (2001). Constructing evidence within the qualitative project. In J. M. Morse, J. M. Swanson, & A. J. Kuzel, The nature of qualitative evidence (pp. 187-200). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Moreno, E. (1995). Rape in the field: Reflections from a survivor. In D. Kulick & M. Willson (Eds.), Taboo: Sex, identity and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork (pp. 219-250). New York: Routledge.
32.
Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 147-149.
33.
Morse, J. M. (2001a). Are there risks in qualitative research?Qualitative Health Research, 11, 3-4.
34.
Morse, J. M. (2001b). Toward a praxis theory of suffering. Advances in Nursing Science, 24(1), 47-59.
35.
Morse, J. M., & Penrod, J. (1999). Linking concepts of enduring, suffering, and hope. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31(2), 145-150.
36.
Olesen, V. L. (2000). Feminisms and qualitative research at and into the millennium. In N. K. Denzin & Y. E. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 215-255). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Plummer, K. (2003). Continuity and change in Howard S. Becker’s work: An interview with Howard S. Becker. Sociological Perspectives, 46, 21-39.
38.
Silverman, D. (2001). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.
39.
Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
40.
Smith, G. W. H. (2003). Chrysalid Goffman: A Note on Some Characteristics of Response to Depicted Experience. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 645-658.
41.
Thorne, S. E. (2001).The implications of disciplinary agenda on quality criteria for qualitative research. In J. M. Morse, J. M. Swanson, & A. J. Kuzel, The nature of qualitative evidence (pp. 141-159). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Wax, R. H. (1971). Doing fieldwork: Warnings and advice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
