Maximizing Theoretical Contributions of Participant Observation While Managing Challenges

Abstract

Participant observation (PO) is an important method of data collection used in a variety of research methodologies. PO can inform theory development by providing understanding of participants’ behaviors and the contexts that influence their behaviors. Because theory development is important in grounded theory studies, we emphasize theoretical contributions of PO while interrogating the challenges of using PO, in particular, attending to informed consent. We use the exemplar of a mid-range theory about nursing practice with hospitalized older adults to highlight contributions of PO to category development. While acknowledging theoretical contributions, we explore challenges entailed in observations where consenting participants interact with vulnerable patients and a changing cast of health care professionals in dynamic contexts. Reflexivity about interactions with vulnerable individuals, as well as other actions to avoid compromising voluntary consent, enhances contributions of PO.

Keywords

grounded theory participant observation symbolic interaction vulnerable populations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angrosino

M. V.

(2005). Recontextualizing observation: Ethnography, Pedagogy, and the prospects for a progressive political agenda. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 729–746.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Baumbusch

J. L.

(2011). Conducting critical ethnography in long-term residential care: Experiences of a novice researcher in the field. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67, 184–192. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05413.x

Blumer

(1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkley: University of California Press.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2010). Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research involving Humans. Ottawa: Author.

Coker

Ploeg

Kaasalainen

Fisher

(2013). Assessment of rigour in published nursing intervention studies that use observational methods. The Qualitative Report, 18(67), 1–23.

Dahlke

Phinney

Hall

W. A.

Rodney

Baumbusch

(2014). Orchestrating care: Nursing practice with hospitalized older adults. International Journal of Older People Nursing. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/opn.12075

Glaser

B. G.

(1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Goodwin

Pope

Mort

Smith

(2003). Ethics and ethnography: An experiential account. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 567–577. doi:10.1177/1049732302250723

10.

Hall

W. A.

Callery

(2001). Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating reflexivity and relationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 257–274. doi:10.1177/104973201129119082

11.

Health Canada. (2009). Health Canada’s Research Ethics Board: Ethics review of research involving humans. Ottawa: Author.

12.

Kawulich

B. B.

(2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Article 43. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-05/05-2-43-e.htm

13.

Leininger

M. M.

McFarland

M. R.

(2006). Culture care diversity and universality: A worldwide nursing theory. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

14.

Mead

G. H.

(1934). Works of George Herbert Mead (Vol. 1): Mind, self & society: From the standpoint of a social behaviourist ( Morris

C. W.

, Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

15.

Mulhall

(2003). In the field: Notes on observation in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41, 306–313. doi:10.1046/j.1365–2648.2003.02514

16.

Polit

D. F.

Beck

C. T.

(2010). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

17.

Smeby

K. L.

Kirkevold

(2013). The influence of relationships on personhood in dementia care: A qualitative hermeneutic study. BMC Nursing, 12, Article 29. doi:10.1086/1472-6955-12-29

18.

Tedlock

(2005). The observation of participation and the emergence of public ethnography. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 474–475). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

19.

Timeseena

(2009). Participation observation in field research: An overview. Nepalese Journal of Qualitative Research Methods, 3, 375-386.

20.

Watts

J. H.

(2011). Ethical and practical challenges of participant observation in sensitive health research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14, 301–312.