This study aims to conduct a systematic synthesis of qualitative research exploring patient experiences with telehealth in palliative care and to evaluate the implications of these experiences through the lens of Merle Mishel's Uncertainty in Illness Theory.
Methods
Ten qualitative studies published between 2015 and 2025 were analyzed. The literature review was conducted using the SPIDER strategy, with quality assessment performed via the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Thematic analysis was carried out using MAXQDA software.
Results
The findings were synthesized into 3 meta-themes in accordance with Mishel's framework. Telehealth was found to facilitate access to information, save time and energy, and offer comfort and safety. However, uncertainty regarding technology use and emotional support needs were more pronounced in elderly and terminally ill patients.
Conclusion
While telehealth applications offer significant advantages in palliative care, individual and contextual factors must be considered. In line with Mishel’s theory, access to information and patient involvement are key elements in managing uncertainty.
HeadBASchapmireTJZhengY. Telehealth in palliative care: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2017;19:130-139.
2.
HaydonHMSnoswellCLThomasEE, et al.Enhancing a community palliative care service with telehealth leads to efficiency gains and improves job satisfaction. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27:625-630. doi:10.1177/1357633X211048952
3.
HancockSPrestonNJonesHGadoudA. Telehealth in palliative care is being described but not evaluated: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. 2019;18:114. doi:10.1186/s12904-019-0495-5
4.
CapurroDGanzingerMPerez-LuJKnaupP. Effectiveness of eHealth interventions and information needs in palliative care: a systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e72. doi:10.2196/jmir.2812. https://www.jmir.org/2014/3/e72/
5.
NwosuAC. Telehealth requires improved evidence to achieve its full potential in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2023;37(7):896-897. doi:10.1177/02692163231182461
6.
MostafaeiASadeghi-GhyassiFKabiriNHajebrahimiS. Experiences of patients and providers while using telemedicine in cancer care during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative literature. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30:10483-10494. doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07415-6
7.
ImamSNBraunUKGarciaMAJacksonLK. Evolution of telehealth-its impact on palliative care and medication management. Pharmacy (Basel). 2024;12(2):61. doi:10.3390/pharmacy12020061
8.
Allen WattsKMaloneEDionne‐OdomJN, et al.Can you hear me now? improving palliative care access through telehealth. Res Nurs Health. 2021;44(1):226-237.
9.
MishelMH. Reconceptualization of the uncertainty in illness theory. Image J Nurs Sch. 1990;22(4):256-262.
10.
Ataman YıldızGEti AslanF. Care of a patient planned for left ventricular assist device according to Michel's theory of uncertainty in disease: a case report. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024;15(37):115-120.
11.
VeenisJFRadhoeSPHooijmansPBrugtsJJ. Remote monitoring in chronic heart failure patients: is non-invasive remote monitoring the way to go?Sensors. 2021;21(3):887. doi:10.3390/s21030887
12.
ÖzdemirÖYamanZYılmazM. Nursing care applied to an individual diagnosed with COVID-19 according to Merley Mishel's theory of uncertainty in illness: a case report. YOBU Faculty of Health Sciences Journal. 2022;3(2):250-257.
13.
SattarRLawtonRPanagiotiMJohnsonJ. Meta-ethnography in healthcare research: a guideto using a meta-ethnographic approach for literature synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):50.
14.
FunderskovKFRaunkiærMDanbjørgDB, et al.Experiences with video consultations in specialized palliative home-care: Qualitative study of patient and relative perspectives. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(3):e10208. doi:10.2196/10208
15.
KeenanJRahmanRHudsonJ. Exploring the acceptance of telehealth within palliative care: a self-determination theory perspective. Health Technol. 2021;11:575-584.
16.
KallaMO'BrienTMetcalfO, et al.Understanding experiences of telehealth in palliative care: photo interview study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2025;12:e53913.
17.
HackettJAllsopMJTaylorSBennettMIBewickBM. Using information and communication technologies to improve the management of pain from advanced cancer in the community: qualitative study of the experience of implementation for patients and health professionals in a trial. Health Informatics J. 2020;26(4):2435-2445. doi:10.1177/1460458220906289
18.
ViitalaAÅstedt-KurkiPLehtoJTPalonenM. Online follow-up with a mobile device improves incurable cancer patients’ coping–A qualitative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021;55:102047.
19.
TasneemSKimABagheriALebretJ. Telemedicine video visits for patients receiving palliative care: a qualitative study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019;36(9):789-794. doi:10.1177/1049909119846843
20.
RahmanRKeenanJHudsonJ. Exploring rural palliative care patients’ experiences of accessing psychosocial support through telehealth: a longitudinal approach. Qual Res Med Healthc. 2020;4(1):31-42. doi:10.4081/qrmh.2020.8821
21.
van GurpJvan SelmMVissersKvan LeeuwenEHasselaarJ. How outpatient palliative care teleconsultation facilitates empathic patient-professional relationships: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0124387. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124387
22.
MaySGehlhaarAStahlhutK, et al.“Let’s put it this way: you can’t really live without it” - digital technologies in routine palliative care delivery: an explorative qualitative study with patients and their family caregivers in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24:702.
23.
VorugantiTHusainAGrunfeldEWebsterF. Disruption or innovation? A qualitative descriptive study on the use of electronic patient-physician communication in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26:2785-2792.
24.
SteindalSANesAAGodskesenTE, et al.Advantages and challenges of using telehealth for home-based palliative care: systematic mixed studies review. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e43684. doi:10.2196/43684
25.
GhazalKYSingh BeniwalSDhingraA. Assessing telehealth in palliative care: a systematic review of the effectiveness and challenges in rural and underserved areas. Cureus. 2024;16(8):e68275. doi:10.7759/cureus.68275
26.
OkunadeKBashan NkhomaKSalakoO, et al.Understanding data and information needs for palliative cancer care to inform digital health intervention development in Nigeria, Uganda and Zimbabwe: protocol for a multicountry qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e032166. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032166
27.
WinterRLeanageNRobertsNNormanRIHowickJ. Experiences of empathy training in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(10):3017-3037.
28.
SpagnolliACenzatoGGamberiniL. Modeling the conversation with digital health assistants in adherence apps: some considerations on the similarities and differences with familiar medical encounters. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(12):6182.
29.
YuJARayKNParkSY, et al.System-level factors associated with use of outpatient specialty palliative care among patients with advanced cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2018;15(1):e10-e19.
30.
World Health Organization (WHO). Global report on digital health. 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int
31.
NgomaMMushiBMorseRS, et al.mPalliative care link: examination of a mobile solution to palliative care coordination among Tanzanian patients with cancer. JCO Glob Oncol. 2021;7:1306-1315.
32.
RobertsBRobertsonMOjukwuEIWuDS. Home based palliative care: known benefits and future directions. Curr Geriatr Rep. 2021;10(4):141-147. doi:10.1007/s13670-021-00372-8
33.
TiemanJJSwetenhamKMorganDDToTHCurrowDC. Using telehealth to support end of life care in the community: a feasibility study. BMC Palliat Care. 2016;15(1):94.
34.
TanYLiangXMingWXingHWangYGaoY. A scoping review of digital technology applications in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care. 2024;23(1):290. doi:10.1186/s12904-024-01626-w
