This study explores social processes associated with e-mail overload, drawing on Sproull and Kiesler's first and second-order effects of communication technologies and Boden's theory of lamination. In a three-part study, the authors examined e-mail interactions from a government organization by logging e-mails, submitting an e-mail string to close textual analysis, and analyzing focus group data about e-mail overload. The results reveal three characteristics that contribute to e-mail overload— unstable requests, pressures to respond, and the delegation of tasks and shifting interactants—suggesting that e-mail talk, as social interaction, may both create and affect overload.
Adam, R. (2002). Is e-mail addictive?Aslib Proceedings, 54(2), 85-94.
2.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Baron, N. S. (2000). Alphabet as e-mail: How written English evolved and where it's heading. New York: Routledge.
4.
Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
5.
Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York: Morrow.
6.
Crawford, A. B. (1982). Corporate electronic mail: A communication-intensive application of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 6, 1-14.
7.
Dabbish, L. A., Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Understanding e-mail use: Predicting action on a message. In Proceedings of CHI 2005 (pp. 691-700). New York: ACM Press.
8.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organization information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
9.
Dawley, D. D., & Anthony, W. P. (2003). User perceptions of e-mail at work. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17, 170-200.
10.
Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, marketing, accounting, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society: An International Journal, 20, 1-20.
11.
Feather, J. (1998). The information society: A study of continuity and change. London: Library Association.
12.
Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8, 8-34.
13.
Friedman, R., & Curral, S. (2003). E-mail escalation: Dispute exacerbating elements of e-mail communication. Human Relations, 56, 1325-1348.
14.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Girrier, R. P. (2003). E-mail is a two-edge sword. United States Naval Institute Proceedings, 129, 90-93.
17.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
Goldschmidt, K., Folk, N., Callahan, M., & Shapiro, R. (2001). E-mail overload in Congress: Managing a communication crisis. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from http://www.congressonlineproject.org
19.
Hahn, M., Lawson, R., & Lee, Y. G. (1992). The effects of time pressure and information load on decision quality. Psychology & Marketing, 9, 365-378.
20.
Higa, K., Sheng, O. R., Shin, B., & Figueredo, A. J. (2000). Understanding relationships among teleworkers' e-mail usage, e-mail richness perceptions, and e-mail productivity perceptions under a software engineering environment. IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management, 47, 163-173.
21.
Ingham, J. (2003). E-mail overload in the UK workplace. Aslib Proceedings, 55, 166-180.
22.
Kankaanranta, A. (2005). Hej seppo, Could you pls comment on this! Internal email communication in lingua franca English in a multinational company. Jyvaskyla, Finland: University of Jyvaskyla, Centre for Applied Language Studies.
23.
Locker, K. O. (1999). Business and administrative communication (5th ed.). New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
24.
Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science, 5, 502-527.
25.
McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2005). Organizational behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
26.
Minsky, B. D., & Marin, D. B. (1999). Why faculty members use e-mail: The role of individual differences in channel choice. Journal of Business Communication, 36, 194-217.
27.
Moore, G. (1991). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers. New York: HarperCollins.
28.
Mulholland, J. (1999). E-mail: Uses, issues, and problems in institutional settings. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & C. Nickerson (Eds.), Writing business: Genres, media, and discourses (pp. 57-84). Singapore: Addison-Wesley.
29.
Nickerson, C. (1999). The use of English in electronic mail in a multinational corporation. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & C. Nickerson (Eds.), Writing business: Genres, media, and discourses (pp. 35-56). Singapore: Addison-Wesley.
30.
Nyce, H. E., & Groppa, R. (1983). Electronic mail at MHT. Management Technology, 1, 65-72.
31.
O'Leary, M. B. (1999). Electronic media: Teaching note for Sloan Communication Program. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from http://ocw.mit.edu
32.
Oxford English dictionary. (2005). Available at http://dictionary.oed.com/entrance.dtl
33.
Rogen International. (2001, April). First international study on impact of e-mail: Tool or torment? Retrieved July 23, 2005, from http://www.rogenint.com
34.
Sacks, H. (1963). On sociological description. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 8, 1-16.
35.
Shenk, D. (1997). Data smog: Surviving the information glut. London: Abacus.
36.
Sims, B. R. (1996). Electronic mail in two corporate workplaces. In J. Dautermann & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Electronic literacies in the workplace: Technologies of writing (pp. 41-64). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
37.
Smeltzer, L., Leonard, D., & Hynes, G. (2001). Managerial communication: Strategies and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
38.
Spinuzzi, C. (1994). A different kind of forum: Rethinking rhetorical strategy for electronic text and media. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 37, 213-217.
39.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Sullivan, C. B. (1995). Preferences for electronic mail in organizational communication tasks. Journal of Business Communication, 32, 49-64.
41.
Symon, G. (2000). Information and communication technologies and the network organization: A critical analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 389-414.
42.
Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication at its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Trevino, L. K., Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Communication Research, 14, 553-574.
44.
Van den Hooff, B., Groot, J., & De Jonge, S. (2005). Situational influences on the use of communication technologies: A meta-analysis and exploratory study. Journal of Business Communication, 42, 4-27.
45.
Weber, R. (2004). Editor's comments. MIS Quarterly, 28, iii-xiii.
46.
Webster, J., & Trevino, L. K. (1995). Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of media choices: Two policy capturing studies. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1544-1572.
47.
Whittaker, S., & Sidner, C. (1996). E-mail overload: Exploring personal information management of e-mail. In Proceedings of CHI 1996 (pp. 276-283). New York: ACM Press.
48.
Wong, I. F. H., Connor, M. D., & Murfett, U. M. (2006). Business communication: Asian perspectives, global focus (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
49.
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17, 299-326.
50.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
Zack, M., & McKenney, J. (1995). Social context and interaction in ongoing computersupported management groups. Organization Science, 6, 394-422.
52.
Zucchermaglio, C., & Talamo, A. (2003). The development of a virtual community of practices using electronic mail and communicative genres. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17, 259-284.
