This article describes a pilot effort for an accreditation-driven writing assessment in a business college, detailing the pilot's logistics and methods. Supported by rubric software and a philosophy of “real readers, real documents,” the assessment was piloted in summer 2006 with five evaluators who were English instructors and four who worked or taught in business environments. The nine evaluators were each given 10 reports that were drawn from a sample of 50 reports completed in a writing-intensive course. They created 88 individual assessments using a 10-category rubric. While the overarching purpose of the pilot was to determine the effectiveness of the methods used, the results may also be of interest to those involved with the assessment of writing.
Abbott, C., & Eubanks, P. (2005). How academics and practitioners evaluate technical texts: A focus group study. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19, 171-218.
2.
Applebee, A., Langer, J., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English . American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685-730.
3.
Elbow, P. (1996). Writing assessment in the 21st century: A utopian view. In L. Bloom, D. Daiker, & E. White (Eds.), Composition in the twenty-first century: Crisis and change (pp. 83-100). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
4.
Haswell, R. (2000). Documenting improvement in college writing: A longitudinal approach. Written Communication, 17, 307-352.
5.
Huot, B. (1996). The need for a theory of writing assessment. In L. Bloom, D. Daiker, & E. White (Eds.), Composition in the twenty-first century: Crisis and change (pp. 112-115). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
6.
Huot, B. (1999). Beyond accountability: Reading with faculty as partners across the disciplines. In K. B. Yancey & B. Huot (Eds.), Assessing writing across the curriculum: Diverse approaches and practices (pp. 69-78). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
7.
Huot, B. (2002). (Re)articulating writing assessment. Logan: Utah University Press.
8.
Langer, J. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 837-880.
9.
McLeod, S. (2003). Celebrating diversity (in methodology). In L. Bloom, D. Daiker, & E. White (Eds.), Composition studies in the new millennium: Rereading the past, rewriting the future (pp. 151-154). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
10.
Prior, P., Hawisher, G., Gruber, S., & MacLaughlin, N. (1999). Research and WAC evaluation: An in-progress reflection. In K. B. Yancey & B. Huot (Eds.), Assessing writing across the curriculum: Diverse approaches and practices (pp. 185-216). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
11.
Sommers, N. (2002). The Harvard study of undergraduate writing. Retrieved March 9, 2008, from http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~expos/index.cgi?section=study
12.
Taylor, T. (2003). A methodology of our own. In L. Bloom, D. Daiker, & E. White (Eds.), Composition studies in the new millennium: Rereading the past, rewriting the future (pp. 142-150). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
13.
Whithaus, C. (2005a). [Review of the book Coming to terms: Theorizing writing assessment in composition studies]. Assessing Writing , 10, 214-218.
14.
Whithaus, C. (2005b). Teaching and evaluating writing in the age of computers and high-stakes testing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Retrieved March 20, 2007, from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/drexel/Doc?id=10103804&ppg=121
15.
Williamson, M. (1999). Pragmatism, positivism, and program evaluation . In K. B. Yancey & B. Huot (Eds.), Assessing writing across the curriculum: Diverse approaches and practices (pp. 251-262). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
16.
Xue, Y., & Meisels, S.J. (2004). Early literacy instruction and learning in kindergarten: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study-kindergarten class of 1998-99. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 191-229.
17.
Yancey, K. B., & Huot, B. (Eds.). (1999). Introduction: Assumptions about assessing WAC programs. Some axioms, some observations, some context . In K. B. Yancey & B. Huot (Eds.), Assessing writing across the curriculum: Diverse approaches and practices (pp. 7-14). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
18.
Zhao, J.J., & Alexander, M.W. (2004). The impact of business communication education on students' short- and long-term performances. Business Communication Quarterly, 67, 24-40.
