Abstract
Strong oral reading fluency skills are an important indication of good reading. In addition, reading engagement is often correlated with reading success. Unfortunately, students with learning disabilities (LD) often struggle to read fluently and engage with text. Incorporating graphic novels as part of a comprehensive reading program may help support student engagement with text during reading fluency instruction. This article outlines how teachers can use graphic novels as part of a comprehensive reading program to help engage students with LD in reading during fluency instruction. A brief summary of the literature surrounding comprehensive fluency instruction and the use of graphic novels is provided. In addition, a scenario is provided to illustrate guidelines for fluency planning and instruction using graphic novels. Finally, conclusions are summarized.
Reading fluency is important because the ability to decode words quickly, accurately, and with prosody allows readers to use the cognitive processes required to comprehend text (Burke, Boon, Hatton, & Bowman-Perrott, 2015; Paige, Rasinski, & Magpuri-Lavell, 2012). There is strong evidence to support the relationship between comprehension and reading fluency (Rasinski, Rikli, & Johnston, 2009; Stahl, 2003). Specifically, for students with learning disabilities (LD) in reading, fluency instruction has been found to have positive impacts on achievement in comprehension (Garwood, Brunsting, & Fox, 2014; Neddenriep, Fritz, & Carrier, 2011; Yakimowski, Faggella-Luby, Kim, & Wei, 2016).
Unfortunately, some students with LD who require great effort to read find the task of reading daunting and undesirable. These students are more likely to lack interest and disengage during reading instruction, which may negatively affect their willingness to remain on task and persist through difficulties when learning the underlying fundamental skills and strategies needed to boost their reading achievement (Thijs & Verkuyten, 2009). The result may be falling further and further behind grade-level peers in reading (Stanovich, 1986). To break this cycle of reading failure, teachers may incorporate strategies and instructional tools as part of comprehensive reading instruction that engages students and invokes feelings of success and enjoyment (Applegate & Applegate, 2004; Brenna, 2013).
Comprehensive fluency instruction, which involves multicomponent strategy instruction, has been found to be effective for readers struggling with fluency. In addition, graphic novels are an emerging genre of fiction and nonfiction literature that has been found to be an engaging instructional tool to use with students who experience reading deficits (Clark, 2013; Matthews, 2011). This article provides a framework for how to use graphic novels to deliver comprehensive fluency instruction that is targeted and engaging for students with LD in reading. The article begins with an overview of comprehensive fluency instruction. It continues with a summary of the benefits of graphic novels. A structure for planning, implementation, and conclusions is also provided.
Comprehensive Fluency Instruction
Students with LD in reading may struggle to remain engaged during reading instruction. It is therefore important that fluency interventions involve frequent and repeated practice that will support motivation and engagement with this population of students (Zimmerman & Kruse, 2013). Explicit comprehensive fluency instruction can have a significant positive impact on reading achievement (Neddenriep et al., 2011; Piluski & Chard, 2005). A comprehensive approach to fluency instruction incorporates multiple components during each instructional session and includes a variety of strategies that can be quite engaging for students with LD in reading (Kuhn, Rasinski, & Zimmerman, 2014; Kuhn et al., 2006). Specifically, comprehensive fluency instruction may include the following components: (a) use interest inventories to help choose engaging texts at students’ reading level, (b) support comprehension by activating or building background knowledge before reading, (c) encourage prosody (proper tone and intonation) and repeated exposure to text through fluent models and repeated readings, (d) stop and check for understanding during reading through questioning and summarizing, (e) provide opportunities to monitor progress through fluency rate charts, and (f) support comprehension through written responses to the text after reading (Hudson, Lane, & Pullen, 2005; Kuhn et al., 2014; Nichols, Rupley, & Rasinski, 2008).
In recent years, researchers have examined the effects of comprehensive fluency instruction on a diverse population of students reading one or more years behind their grade-level peers. Some of the fluency strategies used across the studies include previewing and predicting text, repeated reading through choral and echo reading, questioning and summarizing throughout text, prosody practice, teacher modeling, and written response to text. Specifically, Wolf, Miller, and Donnelly (2000) used a comprehensive fluency intervention that incorporated repeated reading, vocabulary, and written response components. In addition, Rasinski et al. (2017) explored the use of comprehensive fluency instruction that included vocabulary practice and repeated reading with struggling third-grade readers. Rasinski et al. (2017) stressed that fluency instruction should focus on more than just reading quickly. Results across studies indicated gains in fluency and other components of reading such as comprehension.
In addition to a multicomponent approach, the kinds of texts used during comprehensive fluency instruction may have an impact on student success. Incorporating graphic novels can further bolster comprehensive fluency instruction because of the possible positive impacts on student motivation, interest, and engagement.
Graphic Novels
A strong positive correlation generally exists between reading engagement and reading achievement (Ching & Fook, 2013; Gavigan, 2011; Guthrie & Wigfield, 2000). Therefore, it may be helpful that intervention strategies implemented with struggling students focus on improving both reading and engagement (Crawford, 2003; Guthrie & Davis, 2003). Readers are often more engaged during reading instruction when they are interested in the information provided in the text (Garwood et al., 2014; Guthrie & Wigfield, 2000; Zimmerman & Kruse, 2013). It is therefore important that when teachers engage in fluency instruction that involves repeated exposure to text, they use texts that are motivating, interesting, and engaging for students (Nichols et al., 2008; Topping, 2014).
Graphic novels are stories that use images and text to convey information (Eisner, 1996). Often thought of as having limited use because of their tendency to be used as recreational reading by students (Gavigan, 2011), graphic novels have only recently found a place within the reading curriculum in schools. They are one kind of text that students with disabilities and their typical peers have found motivating, interesting, and engaging, especially when compared with more traditional texts (Brown & Begoray, 2017). The appeal of graphic novels for the struggling reader with LD is not surprising. McTaggert (2008) suggested the use of graphic novels to supplement reading instruction because they incorporate visual illustrations within the text, allowing the reader to use these cues to recognize unfamiliar words, thereby improving reading fluency.
Only in recent years have studies incorporating the use graphic novels during reading instruction been conducted. There have been only a few studies examining the effects of graphic novels on reading fluency, especially in the area of reading disabilities. However, the efficacy of graphic novels as a tool for engagement may be applied across populations of students. Within the research studies found documenting the benefits of graphic novels in the classroom, the reading levels of participants across studies varied from students reading one or more years behind their grade-level peers to students reading slightly above grade level. Researchers specifically examined the impact of using graphic novels on students’ reading achievement and motivation to read. Overall, when teachers incorporated graphic novels during reading instruction, social validity questionnaires revealed that students experienced increases in intrinsic motivation to read, increased feelings of self-efficacy in reading, increases in text comprehension, and increases in oral reading fluency (Brown, 2013; Dallacqua, 2012; Smetana & Grisham, 2011–2012). Specifically, in the study conducted by Smetana and Grisham (2011–2012), students’ fluency scores increased by 25 words per minute after they participated in a Tier 2 reading intervention that incorporated graphic novels. Students moved from at-risk status to some-risk status and they wanted to read more. These findings support the benefits of teachers planning and implementing comprehensive fluency instruction that incorporates graphic novels.
Planning Comprehensive Fluency Instruction
When planning for the use of graphic novels, teachers may consider the following six steps: (a) conduct interest surveys, (b) choose texts and check readability, (c) choose prereading organizers, (d) designate stop and check points, (e) identify a fluency timing chart, and (f) identify a written response frame. These six planning steps can be characterized as choosing instructional materials, prereading, repeated reading, and extension activities.
Choose Instructional Materials
Reading interest inventory surveys are an important tool for teachers to use as a way to get to know students before beginning reading instructional interventions. This is especially true for students identified with LD who struggle and are often disengaged from reading. Students with LD in reading are more likely to be motivated to read and engage in on-task behavior when they are provided with texts that are of interest to them (Gavigan, 2011; MacSuga-Gage & Simonsen, 2015). Surveys can be found for free online, only take a few minutes to administer, and can be conducted one-on-one or in a group. When choosing texts, a reading interest survey will be crucial in helping teachers determine the genre that will be most motivating to students. They should also be conducted periodically throughout the school year as student interests evolve and change. A sample interest survey has been included in Figure 1. Once interest surveys are conducted, teachers will be able to make informed decisions about the reading genre that will best support instructional interventions. Teachers typically can find a variety of graphic novels in their school or local libraries.

Sample reading interest survey.
It is important to note that the graphic novel medium is quite diverse. When searching for texts for elementary age students, teachers may come across works with a wide range of content that may or may not be appropriate for young children. Teachers may find graphic novels in the Superhero, Manga, Nonfiction, Adaptations and Spinoffs, Human Interest, Satire, Action and Adventure, Science Fiction, Crime and Mysteries, Fantasy, and Horror genres (Pawuk, 2007; Weiner, 2002). Teachers should be sure to examine texts to make sure the content (e.g., violence and inappropriate images) is appropriate for the age group that will use the texts. A list of graphic novels appropriate for elementary age students is provided by genre in Table 1.
Graphic Novels by Genre.
Check Readability
Once teachers choose texts, it is important to match text readability with the target student’s reading level. Texts used during fluency instruction should be at the student’s instructional level (i.e., texts that can be read with 90%–95% accuracy with few errors; Allington, 2001). Online readability calculators are one method for determining the reading level of a piece of text. Some examples of the online readability calculators include the following: (a) readabilityformulas.com, (b) online-utility.com, and (c) storytoolz.com. They require the user to enter sentences from several paragraphs in the text. However, these tools often do not take into account other factors in the text such as vocabulary and sentence structure (Spadorcia, 2005). Therefore, teachers may also examine the vocabulary and sentence structure in the first few chapters of the target text and take into consideration the extent to which they will be providing instructional supports through modeling, choral reading, and independent practice. When examining vocabulary in text, teachers may look for words that can easily be connected to words students already know (Beck, McKeown, & Kucan, 2013). Teachers should consider avoiding texts that contain sentence structures that are too complex and get in the way of student comprehension.
Prereading
Prereading activities such as previewing and predicting help support comprehension because students are actively responding and engaging with text (Stokes, 2001). Previewing and predicting activities may include highlighting key vocabulary, pictures, and text passages essential to comprehending the text. When choosing vocabulary, consider words that are useful, important to the meaning of the story, and words that are repeated throughout the story (Beck et al., 2013). Haager and Vaughn (2013) found that using graphic organizers (GOs) can also facilitate the process of previewing and predicting and have had positive effects with students identified with LD in reading across grade levels. Teachers can find many different GO templates online. When searching for organizers to support the use of graphic novels, it is important that they include a place to record predictions throughout the reading. In addition, stopping and predicting during reading helps support comprehension of the text and allows students to see that changes to original thinking are normal as details emerge. Teachers may want to preview the text ahead of time to determine the most appropriate points to stop and check predictions. Finally, the use of images within graphic novels can also assist students with visualization, a critical component of comprehension.
Repeated Reading
Graphic novels typically have extensive narratives and will require multiple sessions to complete. Teachers may use some planning time to analyze the text for stop and check points. Teachers may examine the total number of pages in the text and designate major stopping points to mark each instructional section. Teachers can reassess initial decisions based on the actual pacing of instruction. They also may consider placing sticky notes within these check points so students may answer comprehension questions, summarize the reading, or make connections to the reading. Teachers may choose to stop at the end of each paragraph or group of paragraphs, section of text, or page of text. Some guidance question, summary, and connection prompts are provided for teachers in Table 2.
Stop and Check Sample Questions and Prompts.
Teachers will also need to plan methods for repeated reading (e.g., choral, echo, independent) and the 1-min timing. Repeated readings, whether teachers use choral or echo reading, will be beneficial for modeling prosody and increasing reading rate and accuracy. Finally, the 1-min timing accompanied by a fluency chart is a beneficial culminating activity for the repeated reading step (Sutherland & Snyder, 2007). Especially for reluctant readers, they can serve as a motivational tool because students can track their progress and set goals for future lessons. Fluency charts are available for free online or teachers may create their own using their preferred word processing tool.
Extension
Written responses help support student understanding of text (Wallace, Pearman, Hail, & Hurst, 2007) and serve as a concluding activity for the lesson. One example of a written response template that would be conducive to graphic novels is a comic strip writing template. The template allows reluctant writers the option of drawing a response to the reading while including short captions to support the drawing(s). Comic strip templates are available free online at websites such as comicbookproject.org and makebeliefscomix.com. They come in the form of one or more panels for drawing and captioning. The written response also lends well to follow-up discussion about the reading in that teachers may discuss the drawing as a way of summarizing the text with students and elicit predictions about future readings.
Implementing Comprehensive Fluency Instruction
Implementing comprehensive fluency instruction using graphic novels involves the following six steps: (a) previewing and predicting, (b) teacher modeling, (c) echo or choral reading, (d) independent practice, (e) 1-min timing, and (f) written response. These six steps can be characterized as prereading, repeated reading, and extension activities.
A short vignette is included to provide context and help illustrate the implementation process.
Mrs. Olive is a special educator who collaborates with general education teachers to support students with LD in the intermediate elementary grades. Benchmark data, curriculum-based assessment data, and anecdotal information suggest that many of her students perform significantly below grade level in oral reading fluency. Mrs. Olive wants to implement an intervention that will address oral reading fluency but is concerned because many of her students have experienced persistent failure. Mrs. Olive suspects that part of the reason they have struggled to improve is because they lack the motivation and interest in reading needed to persist with difficult reading tasks and she wants to pair instructional interventions that focus on oral reading fluency skills and strategies with materials that are motivating and engaging for her students. While working with her students in general education settings, she has witnessed that many of them have a particular interest in the graphic novel medium and she would like to incorporate graphic novels during one-on-one oral reading fluency instruction (see Note 1).
Mrs. Olive is working one-on-one with Grant, a fifth-grade student with LD in reading for 40 min three times per week. Grant’s classroom teacher reports that he has difficulty remaining engaged and gets easily frustrated during reading instruction. This affects his ability to focus and gain information from text. Anecdotal and formal assessment data suggest that Grant struggles primarily with oral reading fluency and secondarily with reading comprehension.
Planning
Mrs. Olive begins the planning process by helping Grant complete a reading interest survey. Through the survey, she finds that he likes scary stories and discovers a set of graphic novels surrounding the Goosebumps series (see Stine, 2006) in the school library. Mrs. Olive decides to use this series to implement comprehensive fluency instruction. She allows Grant the opportunity to choose a book from the series and he chooses one called Creepy Creatures.
Once she chooses to use the text, but before instruction, Mrs. Olive must engage in some additional preparation. The novel contains three different stories that fall under the same theme. She examines the length of each story to determine whether it is realistic to read in its entirety and complete the additional activities she would like to include. Mrs. Olive determines that each story is approximately 40 pages long and therefore designates several major stopping points during each story to mark each instructional session. She plans to reassess her initial decisions based on the actual pacing of instruction.
Mrs. Olive then looks at the readings designated for each instructional session and places sticky notes to mark places she would like Grant to stop to respond to a comprehension question, summarize the reading so far, or make a connection to the reading. Mrs. Olive chooses to engage in choral and independent repeated reading activities followed by the 1-min timing. Finally, as she knows Grant does not like to write, she identifies a comic frame that will allow Grant to respond to each reading by drawing and include minimal writing. The frame contains a prompt at the top of the page that states, “What do you remember most from the passage?” The frame also includes one pane for drawing with a caption bubble. There is also space for a caption at the bottom of the page.
Prereading
Mrs. Olive explains to Grant that they will be reading a graphic novel during their time together. She allows Grant to flip through the pages of the text and asks him how it differs from traditional texts. Mrs. Olive explains that the story is contained within boxes and word balloons and that they will read from left to right and top to bottom. Because the book has long chapters, she tells Grant that she has divided each chapter so they do not run out of time. Mrs. Olive begins instruction of the first story in the novel by reading the title and discusses vocabulary words that are repeated throughout the chapter and are important to understanding the chapter such as adventure, explore, and imagination. She also previews a few passages of the text and highlights some of the images. She asks, “Based on the chapter title and images we have seen from the chapter, what do you think this portion of the chapter will be about?” Mrs. Olive records Grant’s prediction on a GO and then asks, “Why do you think that is what this part of the chapter will be about?” Mrs. Olive also stops at designated points throughout the reading to determine whether Grant has made any changes to his original thinking about the reading based on new and emerging information.
Repeated Reading
Mrs. Olive then tells Grant, “I am going to read a portion of the chapter out loud. Please follow along as I read.” Mrs. Olive models the first four pages of the text. While reading, she stops periodically to ask Grant to answer comprehension questions, summarize the reading, or make a connection to the reading so far. In an effort to improve Grant’s reading rate, accuracy, and prosody, Mrs. Olive engages in a variety of repeated reading practices. First, they choral read the text. Grant then rereads the same portion of the text independently. Mrs. Olive then tells Grant, “Now that we have practiced this portion of the story, let’s do our 1-minute timing.” She starts the timer and Grant reads the designated portion until it is complete or until the timer beeps. Grant shades in his words correct per minute on a fluency chart. Mrs. Olive also returns to Grant’s prediction to analyze his original thinking about the reading.
Extension
Mrs. Olive finishes the lesson by asking Grant to use a comic frame to create a written response. She structures his response by prompting him to draw the most important part he remembers from the reading and provide appropriate captions. When Grant completes his response, Mrs. Olive discusses his drawing and asks for a rationale for his choice. Mrs. Olive completes the session by asking Grant what he thinks he may read about during the next session.
In the upcoming weeks, Mrs. Olive and Grant continue reading the graphic novel using the instructional procedures that have been illustrated. After completing the book, Mrs. Olive can continue reading other stories in the series or move on to another series.
Conclusion
The focus of this article has been on using graphic novels to engage students with LD in reading as part of a comprehensive program focused on teaching students fundamental fluency skills and strategies. Fluency instruction often involves repeated reading of the same text, which can make it difficult to keep students motivated and engaged during instruction. The use of graphic novels has the potential for addressing issues related to motivation and engagement during instruction for students with LD in reading. Graphic novels involve the use of an extended narrative text type and may require additional work to divide the text into manageable parts that fit an instructional time frame; however, they may also be very engaging for students. It is important to remember that some of the initial work that goes into planning for instruction may be repurposed and adapted from year to year. In addition, it is important to remember that graphic novels encompass a wide medium, and in addition to readability, it is important to examine the content of texts to ensure that they are appropriate for the target student population.
Graphic novels can also be used beyond the scope of narrative text and oral reading fluency instruction. Some students with LD in reading may have difficulty with the content of the curriculum as presented in traditional textbooks (Donne, 2011). Graphic novels can be used as a way to make complex content area concepts such as those found in science (e.g., Howtoons, Max Axiom, and Science Comics series) and social studies (e.g., Around the World and Colonial Comics series) texts more comprehensible (Matthews, 2011).
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
