El-AshmawiNAFayedMMSEl-BeialyAAttiaKH. Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of nasoalveolar molding (NAM) using Grayson method versus computer-aided design NAM (CAD/NAM) in infants with bilateral cleft lip and palate: A randomized clinical trial. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2022;59(3):377–389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665621990152.
2.
El-AshmawiNAFayedMMEl-BeialyAFaresAEAttiaKH. Evaluation of facial esthetics following NAM versus CAD/NAM in infants with bilateral cleft lip and palate: A randomized clinical trial. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2022;1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221093176.
3.
LoeffelbeinDJRitschlLMRauA, et al.Analysis of computer-aided techniques for virtual planning in nasoalveolar moulding. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;53(5):455–460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.03.002.
4.
SchieblJBauerFXGrillFLoeffelbeinDJ. RapidNAM: Algorithm for the semi-automated generation of nasoalveolar molding device designs for the presurgical treatment of bilateral cleft lip and palate. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019;67(5):1263–1271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2019.2934907
5.
RitschlLMRauAGullFD, et al.Pitfalls and solutions in virtual design of nasoalveolar molding plates by using CAD/ CAM technology-A preliminary clinical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(4):453–459. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.008.
6.
LiaoYFWangYCChenIJPaiCJKoWCWangYC. Comparative outcomes of two nasoalveolar molding techniques for bilateral cleft nose deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(1):103–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000436827.95321.f2.
