This study attempted to identify communication as a human relational “path” through which principal leadership influenced teacher professional learning. The data was collected from a sample of 970 teachers from 32 Hong Kong primary schools. Online survey was administered, with two questionnaires to measure teacher perceptions of principal leadership and school capacity. Baron and Kenny's (1986) four-step causal process for mediation analysis was employed and integrated with bootstrapping method. Further significance of the mediating effects of communication was tested, and the sizes for both the direct and indirect effects in the relationship were made explicit. The findings affirmed the role of communication as a mediator in the relationship between principal leadership and teacher learning.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6), 1173–1182.
2.
BarthR. (1990). Improving schools from within.San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
3.
BeattyB. R. (2000). The emotions of educational leadership: Breaking the silence.International Journal in Education,3(4), 331–357.
4.
BelchetzD., & LeithwoodK. (2007). Successful leadership: Does context matter and if so, how? In DayC., & LeithwoodK. (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective (pp. 117–137). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
5.
BossertS., DwyerD., RowanB., & LeeG. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal.Educational Administration Quarterly,18(3), 34–64.
6.
BridgesE. (1967). Instructional leadership: a concept reexamined.Journal of Educational Administration,5(2), pp. 136–147.
7.
BrykA., & SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8.
CareyJ. (1989). A Cultural approach to communication.Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
9.
CreemersB., & KyriakidesL. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools.New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
DanielsonC. (2006). Teacher leadership that strengthens professional practice.Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and curriculum development.
DayC., SammonsP., HopkinsD., HarrisA., LeithwoodK., GuQ., BrownE., AhtaridouE., & KingstonA. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes, final report. Research Report N. DCSF-RR108 of Department for Children, Schools and Families. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
13.
De NobileJ. J., & McCormickJ. (2008). Organizational communication and job satisfaction in Australian Catholic primary schools.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,36(1), 101–122. Doi: 10.1177/1741143207084063.
14.
DiPaolaM. F., & Tschannen-MoranM. (2003). The principalship at a crossroads: A study of the conditions and concerns of principals.NASSP Bulletin,87(634), 43–65.
15.
DonaldsonG. A. (2001). Cultivating leadership in schools: Connecting people, purpose, and practice.New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
DuFourR. (1991). The principal as staff developer.Amherst, MA: National Educational Service.
17.
DukeD. L. (2010). Differentiating school leadership: Facing the challenges of practice.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
18.
DwyerJ. (2005). Communication in business (5th ed.). Frenchs Forest: Prentice-Hall.
19.
GoldhaberG. M. (1993). Organizational communication (6th ed.). Madison: Brown and Benchmark.
20.
GoldringE., PorterA., MurphyJ., ElliottS. N., & CravensX. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices.Leadership and Policy in Schools,8, 1–36.
21.
GouranD. S., WiethoffW. E., & DoelgerJ. A. (1994). Mastering communication (2nd). Allyn and Bacon: Boston.
22.
GronnP. C. (1983). Talk as the work: The accomplishment of school administration.Administrative Science Quarterly,28(1), 1–21.
23.
HallE. T., & HallM. R. (1990). Understanding cultural differences: German, French and Americans.Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
HallingerP. (2003). Leading educational change. Reflections on the practice of instructional leadership.Cambridge Journal of Education,33(3), 329–351.
26.
HallingerP., & BryantD. A. (2013). Mapping the terrain of research on educational leadership and management in East Asia.Journal of Educational Administration,51(5), 618–637.
27.
HallingerP., & HeckR. H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,9(2), 157–191.
28.
HallingerP., & MurphyJ. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of principals.Elementary School Journal,86(2), 217–248.
29.
HarrymanE., KresheckJ., & NicolosiL. (1996). Terminology of communication disorders.Williams & Wilkins, Media, Pennsylvania.
30.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement.London: Routledge.
31.
HayesA. F. (2013a). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.New York, NY: Guilford.
HeckR. H., & HallingerP. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement.American Educational Research Journal,46, 626–658.
34.
HeckR. H., & HallingerP. (2005). The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today?Educational Management Administration & Leadership,33(2), 229–244.
35.
KotterJ. (1996). Leading change.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
36.
KrügerM., WitziersB., & SleegersP. (2007). The impact of school leadership on school level factors: Validation of a causal model.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,18(1), 1–20.
37.
KruseS. D. (2001). Creating communities of reform: Continuous improvement planning teams.Journal of Educational Administration,39(4), 359–383.
38.
KyriakidesL., CreemersB., AntoniouP., & DemetriouD. (2009). A synthesis of studies searching for school factors: Implications for theory and research.British Research Journal,36(1), 1–24.
39.
LeithwoodK., & BeattyB. (2008). Leading with teacher emotions in mind.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
40.
LeithwoodK., HarrisA., & HopkinsD. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership.School Leadership and Management,28(1), 27–42.
41.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school.Journal of Educational Administration,38, 112–129.
42.
LeithwoodK., PattenS., & JantziD. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning.Educational Administration Quarterly,46(5), 671–706.
43.
LeithwoodK., Seashore LouisK., AndersonS., & WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning.Toronto: The Wallace Foundation.
44.
LeithwoodK., & SunJ. P. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research.Educational Administration Quarterly,48(3), 387–423.
45.
LeithwoodK. A., & RiehlC. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership.Philadelphia, PA: Laboratory for Student Success, Temple University.
46.
LittleJ. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of reform.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,15(2), 129–151.
LouisK. S., MarksH. M., & KruseS. (April, 1994). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
49.
MarksH., & PrintyS. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly,39(3), 370–397.
50.
McLaughlinM., & TalbertJ. (1990). The context of teaching in secondary schools.New York: Teachers College.
51.
MooneyC. Z., & DuvalR. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-095 (pp. 94–95). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52.
MuchinskyP. M. (1993). Psychology applied to work: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
53.
MulfordB., & SilinsH. (2003). Leadership for organizational learning and improved student outcomes – What do we know?Cambridge Journal of Education,33(2), 175–195.
54.
MulfordB., & SilinsH. (2009). Revised models and conceptualization of successful school principalship in Tasmania. In MulfordB., & EdmundsB. (Eds.) Successful school principalship in Tasmania.Launceston, Tasmania: Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania.
55.
NewmannF. M., KingM. B., & YoungsP. (2000, April). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
56.
PangN. S. K. (2010). Leadership forces in Hong Kong secondary schools.School Leadership & Management,30(4), 351–365.
PreacherK. J., & HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36(4), 717–731.
59.
PreacherK. J., & KelleyK. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative and graphical strategies for communicating indirect effects.Psychological Methods,16, 93–115.
60.
PrintyS. M., MarksH. M., & BowersA. J. (2009). Integrated leadership: how principals and teachers share transformational and instructional influence.Journal of School Leadership,19(5), 504–532.
61.
RobinsonV. M., LIoydC. A., & RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types.Educational Administration Quarterly,44(5), 635–674.
62.
RosenholtzS. (1991). Teachers workplace: The social organization of schools.New York: Longman.
63.
SaphierJ., & KingM. (1985). Good seeds grow in strong cultures.Educational Leadership,42(6), 67–74.
64.
ScheerensJ. (2012). School leadership effects revised.Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
65.
SleegersP., GeijselF., & Van den BergR. (2002). Conditions fostering educational change. In LeithwoodK., HallingerP. (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 75–102). Dordrecht: The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
66.
SmylieM., & HartA. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and change: A human and social capital development perspective. In MurphyJ., & LouisK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 421–441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
SpillaneJ., & ThompsonC. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious educational reform.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,19(2), 85–203.
70.
StollL., & FinkD. (1996). Changing our schools.Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
71.
ThayerL. (1988). Leadership/Communication: A critical review and a modest proposal. In ColdhaberG. M., & BarnettG. A. (eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 231–263). Norwood, N. J.: Ablext Publishing.
72.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2000). Collaboration and the need for trust.Journal of Educational Administration,39(4), 308–331.
73.
VescioV, RossD., & AdamsA. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning.Teaching and Teacher Education,24(1), 80–91.
74.
WalkerA., & KoJ. (2011). Principal leadership in an era of accountability: A perspective from the Hong Kong context.School Leadership and Management,31(4), 369–392.
75.
WeiR. C., Darling-HammondL., AndreeA., RichardsonN., OrphanosS. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad.Dallas, TX.National Staff Development Council. Retrieved on April 14, 2014 from http://learningforward.org/docs/pdf/nsdcstudytechnicalreport2009.pdf
76.
YoungsP., & KingM. B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity.Educational Administration Quarterly,38, 643–670.
