This article examines the micro politics of organizational change by presenting the results of a long-term case study of complex technological change in an automotive manufacturing firm. The article focuses on the political contest around the generation of legitimate knowledge within the change program. The article discusses managerial strategies of knowledge appropriation and employee strategies of resistance to such appropriation. The article follows the evolving managerial accounts of change and highlights the way in which managers developed pragmatic accounts of change in response to the concerns of the employees, accounts that left intact their claims to be change experts in control of the change process.
Adler, P. (1993). The "learning bureaucracy": New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 15, 111-194.
2.
Badham, R. (1995). Managing sociotechnical change: A configuration approach to technology implementation. In J. Benders, J. De Haan & D. Bennett (Eds.), The symbiosis of work and technology (pp. 77-94). London: Taylor & Francis.
3.
Bennis, W.G. (1969). Unresolved problems facing organizational development . Business Quarterly, 34, 80-84.
4.
Bijker, W.E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelite, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Bordia, P., Jones, E., Gallois, C., Callan, V.J., & DiFonzo, N. (2006). Management Are Aliens!
6.
Rumors and Stress during Organizational Change. Group & Organization Management, 31, 601-621.
Do women have to be more participatory than men?Group & Organization Management, 30, 487-513.
9.
Bryman, A. (1989). Research methods and organization studies. London: Unwin Hyman.
10.
Buchanan, D., & Badham, R. (1999). Power, politics and organizational change: Winning the turf game. London: Sage.
11.
Collins, A.B. (1995). Hegel and the Other. In A. B. Collins (Ed.), Hegel in the modern world. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12.
Dawson, P. (1999). Technology, work restructuring and the orchestration of a rational narrative in the pursuit of "management objectives": The political process of plant-level change. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12(1), 39-58.
13.
Dawson, P., & Buchanan, D. (2005). The way it really happened: Competing narratives in the political process of technological change. Human Relations58, 845-865.
14.
Denzin, N.K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.
Doolin, B. (2003). Narratives of change: Discourse, technology and organization. Organization10, 751-770.
16.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
17.
Erikson, K. (1962). Notes on the sociology of deviance. Social Problems, 9, 307-314.
18.
Fleming, P., & Sewell, G. (2002). Looking for the good soldier Švejk: Alternative modalities of resistance in the contemporary workplace, Sociology , 36, 857-873.
19.
Fournier, V. (2002). Keeping the veil of otherness: Practicing disconnection . In B. Czarniawska & H. Höpfl (Eds.), Casting the Other: The production and maintenance of inequalities in work organizations. London: Routledge.
20.
Glaser, B.G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions . Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press .
21.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon.
22.
Harley, B., Wright, C., Hall, R., & Dery, K. (2006). Management reactions to technological change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 58-75.
23.
Hounshell, D.A. (1984). From the American system to mass production 1800-1932: The development of manufacturing technology in the United States. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
Japanese Management Association (1986). Kanban: Just-in-time at Toyota. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
25.
Kumar, K., & Thibodeaux, M.S. (1990). Organizational politics and planned organizational change. Group & Organization Studies, 15, 357-365.
26.
Landes, D. (1986). What do bosses really do? Journal of Economic History, 46, 585-623.
27.
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
28.
McLoughlin, I. (1999). Creative technological change: The shaping of technology and organizations. London: Routledge.
29.
Marglin, S.A. (1974). What do bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production. Review of Radical Political Economics, 6, 60-102.
30.
Marglin, S.A. (1990). Losing touch: The cultural conditions of worker accommodation and resistance. In F. Apffel Marglin & S. A. Marglin (Eds.), Dominating knowledge: Development, culture, resistance (pp. 185-216). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
31.
McLoughlin, I., Badham, R., & Couchman, P. (2000). Rethinking political process in technological change: Socio-technical configurations and frames. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12, 17-37.
32.
McLoughlin, I., Badham, R., & Palmer, G. (2005). Cultures of ambiguity: Design, emergence and ambivalence in the introduction of normative control. Work, Employment & Society19, 67-89.
33.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). An emerging strategy of "direct" research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 582-589.
34.
Monden, Y. (1993). Toyota production system: An integrated approach to just-in-time. Norcross, GA: Institute of Industrial Engineers.
35.
Pettigrew, A. (1985). Contextualist research: A natural way to link theory and practice. In E. E. Lawler, A. M. Mohrman, S. A. Mohrman , G. E. Ledford, & T. G. Cummings (Eds.), Doing research that is useful for theory and practice (pp.222-274). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
36.
Piderit, S.K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25, 783-794.
37.
Preece, D.Organizations and technological change: Strategy, objectives and involvement . London: Routledge.
38.
Roberson, Q.M. (2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 31, 212-236.
39.
Senior, B., & J. Fleming (2006). Organizational change. London : Prentice Hall.
40.
Sewell, G. (1998). The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 397-429.
41.
Sewell, G. (2005). Nice work? Rethinking managerial control in an era of knowledge work. Organization, 12, 685-704.
42.
Sewell, G. & J.R. Barker (2006). Coercion versus care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Academy of Management Review , 31, 934-961.
43.
Sewell, G. & Wilkinson, B. (1992). Someone to watch over me: Surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labor process. Sociology, 26, 271-298.
44.
Shepherd, C. (2006). Constructing enterprise resource planning: A thoroughgoing interpretivist perspective on technological change. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 357-376.
45.
Taylor, F.W. (1990). Scientific management. In D. Pugh (Ed.), Organization theory: Selected readings (pp. 275-295). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. (Original work published in 1912)
46.
Thomas, R., & A. Davies (2005). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26: 683-706.
47.
Thomas, R.J. (1989). Participation and control: A shop floor perspective on employee participation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations , 7, 117-144.
48.
Thompson, J.B. (1984). Studies in the theory of ideology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Williams, R.R. (1992). Recognition: Fichte and Hegel on the Other. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
50.
Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York: Rawson Associates.
51.
Yin, R.K. (1984). Case study research. Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
