A Comparison of Data Models in Chemical Engineering

Abstract

Several data models have been developed in the domain of chemical engineering as the basis of specialized computer-aided tools, for the exchange of data between different tools, or to obtain a better understanding of the domain in order to improve its work processes and to provide specific support functionalities. All these data models where developed independently from each other and for specific applications. Within this paper, a comparison of different chemical engineering data models, that are currently developed and used, is attempted. First some fundamentals of data modeling will be presented. General requirements of data models are given as well as requirements that are specific to chemical engineering. These requirements and the covered data scope build the basis for the discussion and comparison of the data models. Based on this analysis, open issues in data modeling are derived that need to be approached in order to obtain high quality data models as a basis for information management and support of concurrent engineering.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. McKay, A., Bloor, M.S. and de Pennington, A. (1996). A Framework for Product Data , IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 8(5): 825-838 .

2. Motard, R.L., Blaha, M.R., Book, N.L. and Fielding, J.J. (1995). Process Engineering Databases - from the PDXI Perspective , In: Biegler, L.T. and Doherty, M.F. (eds), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design, AIChE Symposium Series 91: 142-152 .

3. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M. and Navathe, S.B. (1986). A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration , ACM Computing Surveys, 18(4): 323-364 .

4. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F. and Lorensen, W. (1991). Object-Oriented Modeling and Design, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs .

5. Bayer, B. (2003). Conceptual Information Modeling for Computer Aided Support of Chemical Process Design, Ph.D. Thesis, RWTH Aachen, Germany.

6. Marquardt, W. (1992). An Object-oriented Representation of Structured Process Models , Computers & Chemical Engineering, 16(Suppl.): S329-S336 .

7. Bogusch, R., Lohmann, B. and Marquardt, W. (2001). Computer-aided Process Modeling with MODKIT , Computers & Chemical Engineering, 25(7-8): 963-995 .

8. Linninger, A.A., Chowdry, S., Bahl, V., Krendl, H. and Pinger, H. (2000). A Systems Approach to Mathematical Modeling of Industrial Processes , Computers & Chemical Engineering, 24(2-7): 591-598 .

9. Chandrasekaran, B. (1994). Functional Representation and Causal Processes, In: Advances in Computers, pp. 73-143, Academic Press .

10.

10. Miller, D.C., Josephson, J.R., Elsass, M.J., Davis, J.F. and Chandrasekaran, B. (1997). Sharable Engineering Knowledge Databases for Intelligent System Applications , Computers & Chemical Engineering, 21(Suppl.): S77-S82 .

11.

11. Elsass, M.J., Miller, D.C., Josephson, J.R. and Davis, J.F. (1998). A Process-plant Knowledge Repository for Multiple Applications , In: Pekny, J.F. and Blau, G.E. (eds), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computer-Aided Process Operations, AIChE Symposium Series 94: 487-493 .

12.

12. Sztipanovits, J. and Karsai, G. (1997). Model-integrated Computing , IEEE Computer, 30(4): 110-111 .

13.

13. Sprinkle, J.M., Ledéczi, A., Karsai, G. and Nordstrom, G. (2001). The New Metamodeling Generation , Eighth Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems, pp. 275-279 , IEEE.

14.

14. Karsai, G., Sztipanovits, J., Franke, H. and Padalkar, S. (1995). Model-embedded On-line Problem Solving Environment for Chemical Engineering , In: Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems pp. 227-233 .

15.

15. Westerberg, A.W., Subrahmanian, E., Reich, Y., Konda, S. and the n-dim group. (1997). Designing the Process Design Process , Computers & Chemical Engineering, 21(Suppl.): S1-S19 .

16.

16. Reich, Y., Konda, S., Subrahmanian, E., Cunningham, D., Dutoit, A., Patrick, R., Thomas, M., Westerberg, A.W. and the n-dim group. (1999). Building Agility for Developing Agile Design Information Systems , Research in Engineering Design, 11(2): 67-83 .

17.

17. ISO 10303 (1997). Part 221, Functional Data and their Schematic Representation for Process Plant, Committee Draft ISO TC184/SC4/WG3 N600.

18.

18. EPISTLE (1998) EPISTLE home page, online available from: http://www.stepcom.ncl.ac.uk/epistle/epistle.htm (accessed June 6, 2001).

19.

19. ISO 10303 (2000). Part 227, Plant Spatial Configuration, ISO Standard 10303-227:2000.

20.

20. ISO 10303 (1998). Part 231, Process Engineering Data: Process Design and Process Specifications of Major Equipment, Committee Draft ISO TC184/SC4/WG3 N740.

21.

21. Batres, R., Naka, Y. and Lu, M.L. (1999). A multidimensional design framework and its implementation in an engineering design environment , Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 7(1): 43-54 .

22.

22. Batres, R. and Naka, Y. (2000). Process Plant Ontologies based on a Multi-dimensional Framework , In: Malone, J.A., Trainham, J.A. and Carnahan, B. (eds), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design, AIChE Symposium Series 96: pp. 433-437 .

23.

23. Batres, R., Aoyama, A. and Naka, Y. (2001). A Life-Cycle Approach for Model Reuse and Exchange, In: Gani, R. and Jorgensen, S.B. (eds), European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering - II, pp. 87-92 Elsevier, Amsterdam .

24.

24. Bayer, B., Schneider, R. and Marquardt, W. (2000). Integration of Data Models for Process Design - First Steps and Experiences , Computers & Chemical Engineering, 24(2-7): 599-605 .

25.

25. Bayer, B. and Marquardt, W. (2003). Towards Integrated Information Models for Data and Documents . Submitted to Computers & Chemical Engineering.

26.

26. Marquardt, W. and Nagl, M. (1998). Tool Integration Via Interface Standardization? , Informationsverarbeitung in der Proze[notdef]- und Anlagentechnik, DECHEMA Monographie, 36. Tutzing Symposium der DECHEMA e.V.: 95-126 .