Students of local politics have argued American federalism implies little role for local tastes in policy making. Peterson (1979) anticipates the pursuit of a productive tax base will depress subnational government spending on social services, while promoting developmental policies. We investigate the role public opinion plays in county-level redistributive, developmental, and allocational program spending in California, using a novel measure of county political ideology. Our findings challenge expectations that local governments are uniformly biased against redistribution. We find that social service spending varies across counties as a function of ideological orientation. In several policy areas, institutional structure mediates the responsiveness of officials.
Arceneaux, Kevin.2001. The "gender gap" in state legislative representation: New data to tackle an old question. Political Research Quarterly54:143-60.
2.
Banfield, Edward, and James Q. Wilson.1963. City politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard and MIT Press.
3.
Benton, Edwin J.2002a. Counties as service delivery agents: Changing expectations and roles. New York: Praeger.
4.
Benton, Edwin J.2002b. County service delivery: Does government structure matter?Public Administration Review62:471-9.
5.
Benton, Edwin J.2003. County governments. In Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy, ed. Jack Rabin.New York: Marcel Dekker.
6.
Benton, Edwin J., and Platon Rigos.1985. Patterns of metropolitan service dominance: Central city and central county service roles compared. Urban Affairs Quarterly220:285-302.
7.
Berkman, Michael B., and Eric Plutzer.2005. Ten thousand democracies: Politics and public opinion in America's school districts. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8.
Berman, David R., and Tanis J. Salant .1996. The changing role of counties in the intergovernmental system. In The American county: Frontiers of knowledge, ed. Donald C. Menzel.Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press .
9.
Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson .1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-93. American Journal of Political Science42:327-48.
10.
Beyle, Thad, Richard G. Niemi, and Lee Sigelman .2002. Gubernatorial, senatorial, and state-level presidential job approval: The U.S. officials job approval ratings (JAR) collection. State Politics and Policy Quarterly2:215-31.
11.
Bowman, Ann O'm, and Richard C. Kearney .1986. The resurgence of the states . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
Brace, Paul, Kellie N. Butler, Kevin Arceneaux, and Martin Johnson.2002. Measuring public opinion in the American states: An expanded range of aggregated measures, 1974-1998. American Journal of Political Science46:173-89.
13.
California Institute of County Governments.2001. The California county fact book. Sacramento : California Institute of County Governments in conjunction with California State Association of Counties. http://www.cicg.org/data (accessed March 10, 2003).
14.
Cigler, Beverly A.1990. County government: A century of change. In The Municipal Yearbook 1989. Washington DC: ICMA, 55-65.
15.
Clark, Terry N.1968. Community structure, decision making, budget expenditures, and urban renewal in 51 cities. American Sociological Review33:576-93.
16.
Clingermayer, James C., and Richard Feiock.1995. Council views toward targeting developmental policy benefits. The Journal of Politics57 (2): 508-20.
17.
Cohen, Jeffrey E.2006. Introduction: Studying public opinion in the American states. In Public opinion in state politics, ed. Jeffrey E. Cohen.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
Connell, Kathleen.2001. State of California counties annual report, fiscal year 1998-1999. Sacramento: Office of California State Controller. http://www.sco.ca.gov/ard/local/locrep/counties/9899/index.shtml (accessed April 17, 2006).
19.
DeSantis, Victor S., and Tari Renner.1996. Structure and policy expenditures in American counties. In The American county: Frontiers of knowledge , ed. Donald C. Menzel.Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
20.
Duncombe, Herbert S.1977. Modern county government. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties.
21.
Dye, Thomas.1979. Politics and economics: The development of the literature on policy determination. Policy Studies Journal (June): 652-62.
22.
Erikson, Robert S.1978. Constituency opinion and congressional behavior: A reexamination of the Miller-Stokes representation data. American Journal of Political Science22:511-35.
23.
Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver.1993. Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Eulau, Heinz.1973. Labyrinths of democracy: Adaptation, linkages, representation, and policies in urban politics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
25.
Feiock, Richard C., and Jonathan West.1993. Testing competing explanations for local policy adoption: Municipal solid waste recycling programs. Political Research Quarterly46 (2): 399-419.
26.
Harvey, A.C.1976. Estimating regression models with multiplicative heteroskedasticity . Econometrica44:461-65.
27.
Hawkins, Brett W.1971. Politics and urban policies. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
28.
Hero, Rodney E.1998. Faces of inequality: Social diversity in American politics . New York: Oxford University Press .
29.
Hill, Kim Quaile, and Angela Hinton-Andersson.1995. Pathways of representation: A causal analysis of public opinion-policy linkages. American Journal of Political Science39:924-35.
30.
Hill, Kim Quaile, and Patricia A. Hurley .1984. Estimating congressional district attitudes with national election study data: A reliability assessment . Political Methodology10:447-63.
31.
Hill, Kim Quaile, and Jan E. Leighley .1996. Political parties and class mobilization in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science40:787-804.
32.
Johnson, Martin, Paul Brace, and Kevin Arceneaux .2005. Public opinion and dynamic representation in the American states: The case of environmental attitudes . Social Science Quarterly86:87-108.
33.
Jones, Bradford S., and Barbara Norrander .1996. The reliability of aggregated public opinion measures. American Journal of Political Science40:295-309.
34.
Kantor, Paul, and Stephen David.1983. The political economy of change in urban budgetary politics: A framework for analysis and a case study. British Journal of Political Science23:251-74.
35.
Katz, Michael R.1989. The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. New York. Pantheon .
36.
Keiser, Lael R., Peter R. Mueser, and Seung-Whan Choi .2004. Race, bureaucratic discretion, and the implementation of welfare reform. American Journal of Political Science48:314-328.
37.
Key, V.O.1949. Southern politics in state and nation. New York. Alfred A. Knopf.
38.
Lewis, Paul.2001a. Looking outward or turning inward? Motivations for development decisions in central cities and suburbs. Urban Affairs Review36:296-320.
39.
Lewis, Paul.2001b. Retail politics: Local sales taxes and the fiscalization of land use. Economic Development Quarterly15:21-35.
40.
Lineberry, Robert L., and Edmund P. Fowler.1967. Reformism and public policies in American cities. American Political Science Review61:701-16.
41.
Lipsky, Michael.1980. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
42.
Martin, Lawrence L., and Ronald C. Nyhan.1994. Determinants of county charter home rule. International Journal of Public Administration17:955-70.
43.
Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes.1963. Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review57:45-56.
44.
Morehouse, Sarah McCally.1973. The state political party and the policy-making process . American Political Science Review67: 55-72.
45.
National Network of State Polls.2007. NNSP: National network of state polls. Last updated April 14, 2007. Lexington: Survey Research Center, University of Kentucky. http://survey.rgs.uky.edu/nnsp/ (accessed August 29, 2007).
46.
Norrander, Barbara.2001. Measuring state public opinion with the senate national election study. State Politics and Policy Quarterly1:111-25.
47.
O'Brien, Robert M.1990. Estimating the reliability of aggregate-level variables on individual-level characteristics. Sociological Methods and Research18:473-504.
48.
Park, David K., Joseph Bafumi, and Andrew Gelman.2003. Bayesian multilevel estimation with post stratification: State-level estimates from national polls. Political Analysis12:375-85.
49.
Peterson, Paul E.1979. A unitary model of local taxation and expenditure policies in the United States. British Journal of Political Science9:281-314.
50.
Peterson, Paul E.1981. City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Pierce, John, Nicholas Lovrich, and C. David Moon .2002. Social capital and government performance: An analysis of twenty American cities. Public Productivity and Management Review25:381-97.
52.
Rom, Mark C.1999. Transforming state health and welfare programs . In Politics in the American states, ed. Virginia Gray and Herbert Jacobs.Washington, DC: CQ Press .
53.
Schneider, Mark, and Kee Ok Park .1989. Metropolitan counties as service delivery agents: The still forgotten governments. Public Administration Review49:345-52.
54.
Schneider, Saundra K., and William G. Jacoby .2006. Citizen influences on state policy priorities: The interplay of public opinion and interest groups. In Public opinion in the states, ed. Jeffrey E. Cohen.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55.
Stein, Robert M., Stephanie Shirley Post, and Allison L. Rinden .2000. Reconciling context and contact effects on racial attitudes. Political Research Quarterly53:285-303.
56.
Stimson, James A., Michael B. MacKuen, and Robert S. Erikson.1996. Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review89:543-65.
57.
U.S. Census Bureau.State and county quick facts. http://www.quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html (accessed March 21, 2003).
58.
Uslaner, Eric M.2006. The civic state: Trust, polarization, and the quality of state government. In Public opinion in the states, ed. Jeffrey E. Cohen.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
59.
Weber, Ronald E., Anne H. Hopkins, Michael L. Mezey, and Frank Munger.1972-1973. Computer simulation of state electorates. Public Opinion Quarterly36:49-65.
60.
Weber, Ronald E., and William R. Shaffer .1972. Public opinion and American state policy-making. Midwest Journal of Political Science16:683-99.
61.
Weisbert, Herbert F., Jon A. Krosnick, and Bruce D. Bowen .1996. An introduction to survey research, polling, and data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
62.
Wlezien, Christopher.1995. The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science39:981-1000.
63.
Wlezien, Christopher.1996. Dynamics of representation: The case of U.S. spending on defence. British Journal of Political Science26:81-103.
64.
Wong, Kenneth K.1988. Economic constraint and political choice in urban policymaking . American Journal of Political Science32:1-18.
65.
Wright, Gerald C., Robert S. Erikson, and John P. McIver .1985. Measuring state partisanship and ideology with survey data. Journal of Politics47:469-89.
